Dergiler / Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems / 2018 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3

Numerical investigation of the effects of different baffle types on the thermal performance of a shell and tube heat exchanger

Sayfa
58–66
Yayın Tarihi
2018-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The numerical simulations based on CFD analysis can provide more information about heat exchangers and this tool can be used to improve both design and the thermal performance of heat exchangers.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, the thermal performance of a small scale shell and tube heat exchanger was performed according to the baffle type by using three dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Thus, we determined five different numerical models and the thermal performance of each models were evaluated under different inlet temperature values selected as 50, 60 and 70°C for the tube side.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The numerical simulations based on CFD analysis can provide more information about heat exchangers and this tool can be used to improve both design and the thermal performance of heat exchangers.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Gövde boru tipi ısı değiştirici · helisel şaşırtma levhası · düz şaşırtma levhası

Özet

In this study, the thermal performance of a small scale shell and tube heat exchanger was performed according to the baffle type by using three dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method. In numerical calculations, segmental and continuous helical baffle types were selected to get the comparative results. For helical baffle type, we used two different models that the numbers of helical rotations and baffle spacing length were different. Thus, we determined five different numerical models and the thermal performance of each models were evaluated under different inlet temperature values selected as 50, 60 and 70°C for the tube side. The inlet temperature value and the mass flow rate of shell side were kept constant during all the numerical calculations. The heat transfer calculations were achieved by using Logarithmic Mean Temperature Difference (LMTD) method. We also employed the Bell-Delaware method which can be used accurately for shell and tube heat exchangers. The highest thermal performance was determined in Case-IV which had equal baffle spacing and the maximum number of rotations for continuous helical baffle. The predicted total pressure drop results obtained from the numerical calculations were in good agreement with the calculated total pressure drop from Bell-Delaware method. The lowest pressure drop and the highest thermal performance were achieved for continuous helical baffle type compared to the segmental equal spacing baffle type. The numerical simulations based on CFD analysis can provide more information about heat exchangers and this tool can be used to improve both design and the thermal performance of heat exchangers.

Abstract

In this study, the thermal performance of a small scale shell and tube heat exchanger was performed according to the baffle type by using three dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method. In numerical calculations, segmental and continuous helical baffle types were selected to get the comparative results. For helical baffle type, we used two different models that the numbers of helical rotations and baffle spacing length were different. Thus, we determined five different numerical models and the thermal performance of each models were evaluated under different inlet temperature values selected as 50, 60 and 70°C for the tube side. The inlet temperature value and the mass flow rate of shell side were kept constant during all the numerical calculations. The heat transfer calculations were achieved by using Logarithmic Mean Temperature Difference (LMTD) method. We also employed the Bell-Delaware method which can be used accurately for shell and tube heat exchangers. The highest thermal performance was determined in Case-IV which had equal baffle spacing and the maximum number of rotations for continuous helical baffle. The predicted total pressure drop results obtained from the numerical calculations were in good agreement with the calculated total pressure drop from Bell-Delaware method. The lowest pressure drop and the highest thermal performance were achieved for continuous helical baffle type compared to the segmental equal spacing baffle type. The numerical simulations based on CFD analysis can provide more information about heat exchangers and this tool can be used to improve both design and the thermal performance of heat exchangers.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAYRAM, H., Sevilgen, G. (2018). Numerical investigation of the effects of different baffle types on the thermal performance of a shell and tube heat exchanger. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 58–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/899585

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. J.-F. Zhang, Y.-L. He, and W.-Q. Tao, “3D numerical simulation on shell-and-tube heat exchangers with middle-overlapped helical baffles and continuous baffles – Part I: Numerical model and results of whole heat exchanger with middle-overlapped helical baffles,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 52, no. 23–24, pp. 5371–5380, Nov. 2009
  2. R.K. Shah, D.P. Sekulic, Fundamentals of heat exchanger design, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, 2003
  3. R. Selbaş, Ö. Kızılkan, and M. Reppich, “A new design approach for shell-and-tube heat exchangers using genetic algorithms from economic point of view,” Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 268–275, Apr. 2006
  4. E. Ozden and I. Tari, “Shell side CFD analysis of a small shell-and-tube heat exchanger,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1004–1014, May 2010
  5. B. Parikshit, K. R. Spandana, V. Krishna, T. R. Seetharam, and K. N. Seetharamu, “A simple method to calculate shell side fluid pressure drop in a shell and tube heat exchanger,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 84, pp. 700–712, May 2015
  6. S. Kakaç, H. Liu, A. Pramuanjaroenkij, Heat exchangers: selection, rating, and thermal design, CRC Press: Florida, 2012
  7. F. Nemati Taher, S. Zeyninejad Movassag, K. Razmi, and R. Tasouji Azar, “Baffle space impact on the performance of helical baffle shell and tube heat exchangers,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 44, pp. 143–149, Nov. 2012
  8. J. Yang, L. Ma, J. Bock, A. M. Jacobi, and W. Liu, “A comparison of four numerical modeling approaches for enhanced shell-and-tube heat exchangers with experimental validation,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 65, no. 1–2, pp. 369–383, Apr. 2014
  9. Q. Wang, G. Chen, Q. Chen, M. Zeng, and D. Zhang, “Numerical Studies of a Novel Combined Multiple Shell-Pass Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger With Helical Baffles,” Heat Transfer: Volume 2, 2008
  10. B. Peng, Q. W. Wang, C. Zhang, G. N. Xie, L. Q. Luo, Q. Y. Chen, and M. Zeng, “An Experimental Study of Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers With Continuous Helical Baffles,” Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 129, no. 10, p. 1425, 2007
  11. Y.-G. Lei, Y.-L. He, R. Li, and Y.-F. Gao, “Effects of baffle inclination angle on flow and heat transfer of a heat exchanger with helical baffles,” Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 2336–2345, Nov. 2008
  12. K. Raj and S. Ganne, “Shell side nu