KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 35 Sayı: 3

AN EFFICIENT MADM METHOD: ELECTROMAGNETISM-LIKE METHOD FOR SELECTION AND ORDERING

Vildan Ç. ÖZKIR
Burak TOPÇU
Sayfa
513–522
Yayın Tarihi
2017-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results show that the method is a useful tool to assist decision-makers in terms selection and ordering decisions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Multiple Attribute Decision Making methods aims to improve the quality of decisions in various fields of management science.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We investigated the performance of proposed method and achieved satisfactory results for many selection and ordering case.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results show that the method is a useful tool to assist decision-makers in terms selection and ordering decisions.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Multi-attribute decision analysis · electromagnetism-like heuristics · attraction-repulsion

Abstract

Multiple Attribute Decision Making methods aims to improve the quality of decisions in various fields of management science. Decision makers are mostly faced with new decisions involving conflicting multiple objectives. Practically, these problems include a ranking information including individual/group judgments on a number of pre-determined alternatives with respect to different criteria. This study proposes a new method, called Electromagnetism-like Method for Selection and Ordering, to select the best alternative and/or to determine the rank order of finite number of alternatives. We investigated the performance of proposed method and achieved satisfactory results for many selection and ordering case. The comparative analysis with other multiple criteria decision making methods verifies the performance of the proposed method. The results show that the method is a useful tool to assist decision-makers in terms selection and ordering decisions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZKIR, V. Ç., TOPÇU, B. (2017). AN EFFICIENT MADM METHOD: ELECTROMAGNETISM-LIKE METHOD FOR SELECTION AND ORDERING. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Cilt: 35 Sayı: 3, 513–522. https://ajindex.com/articles/897811

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Aydin, S., Kahraman, C. and İ. Kaya, (2012), “A new fuzzy multicriteria decision making approach: An application for European Quality Award assessment”, Knowledge-Based Systems, 32, 37-46
  2. Birbil, Ş.İ. and S-C. Fang, (2003), “An Electromagnetism-like Mechanism for Global Optimization”, Journal of Global Optimization, 25, 263–282
  3. Bottani, E. & Rizzi, A., (2006) “A Fuzzy TOPSIS Methodology to Support Outsourcing of Logistics Services", Supply Chain Management: An International Journal”, 11(4), 294-308
  4. Chu, T. C., (2002), “Facility Location Selection Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Under Group Decisions”, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 10, 687-701
  5. Debel, D., De Reyck, B., Leus, R. and M. Vanhoucke, (2006), “A hybrid scatter search/electromagnetism meta-heuristic for project scheduling”, European Journal of Operational Research, 169, 638–653
  6. Ertugrul.I. and N. Karakasoglu. (2009), “Evaluation of bank branch performances by VIKOR”, Endüstri Mühendisliği Dergisi, 20(1), 19-28
  7. Gomes, L. F. A. M. and L. A. D. Rangel, (2009), “An application of the TODIM method to the multicriteria rental evaluation of residential properties”, European Journal of Operational Research, 193(1), 204-211
  8. Hwang, C.L. and K. Yoon, (1981), Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg
  9. Korhonen, P., Wallenius, J. and S. Zionts, (1981), “Solving the discrete multiple criteria problem using convex cones”, Management Science, 30, 1336–1345
  10. Maity, S.R., Chatterjee, P. and S. Chakraborty, (2012), "Cutting tool material selection using grey complex proportional assessment method", Materials & Design, 36, 372-378
  11. Pomerol, J-C., and S. Barba-Romero, 2000, Multicriterion Decision in Management: Principles and Practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts, USA
  12. Shahanaghi, K. and S.A. Yazdian, (2009), “Vendor Selection Using a New Fuzzy Group TOPSIS Approach”, Journal of Uncertain Systems, 3(3), 221-231
  13. Srinivasan V. and A.D. Shocker, (1973), “Linear programming for multidimensional analysis of preferences, Psychometrika, 38, 337-369
  14. Tian, J., Yu, D., Yu, B. and S. Ma (2013), “A fuzzy TOPSIS model via chi-square test for information source selection”, Knowledge-Based Systems, 37, 515-527
  15. Xu, L. and J-B. Yang, (2001), “Introduction to Multi-Criteria Decision Making and the Evidential Reasoning Approach” Working Paper, No. 0106, Manchester Sch