Dergiler / Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 36 Sayı: 4

AN EMPIRICAL APPROACH FOR PROPELLER TIP VORTEX CAVITATION NOISE

Sayfa
1127–1139
Yayın Tarihi
2018-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The effects of blade number, cavitation number and advance coefficient on propeller tip vortex cavitation noise have been discussed.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, the TVI (Tip Vortex Index) technique has been applied to a marine propeller to predict the noise due to tip vortex cavitation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The benchmark DTMB4119 model propeller has been chosen for the hydro- acoustic performance analysis in open water condition.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The effects of blade number, cavitation number and advance coefficient on propeller tip vortex cavitation noise have been discussed.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Cavitation · lifting surface method · propeller noise

Abstract

In this study, the TVI (Tip Vortex Index) technique has been applied to a marine propeller to predict the noise due to tip vortex cavitation. The benchmark DTMB4119 model propeller has been chosen for the hydro- acoustic performance analysis in open water condition. The flow around the model propeller has been solved both under non-cavitating and cavitating conditions by lifting surface method (LSM) based on potential flow theory and RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes) approach based on finite volume method. TVI technique has been coupled with LSM. Uncertainty study based on grid convergence index (GCI) has also been done for RANS approach to determine the optimum grid number. The results of LSM and RANS methods have been validated with the available experimental data under non-cavitating condition. LSM and RANS methods have also been compared in terms of cavity patterns and hydrodynamic performance. The effects of blade number, cavitation number and advance coefficient on propeller tip vortex cavitation noise have been discussed.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SEZEN, S., DOĞRUL, A., BAL, Ş. (2018). AN EMPIRICAL APPROACH FOR PROPELLER TIP VORTEX CAVITATION NOISE. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Cilt: 36 Sayı: 4, 1127–1139. https://ajindex.com/articles/897690

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. T. Kim, J. Jeon, S. Chu, S. Kim, and W. Joo, “Numerical and Experimental Prediction Methods of Cavitation Noise Radiated by Underwater Propellers,” presented at the International Congress on Acoustics, Buenos Aires, 2016
  2. F. H. Lafeber, J. Bosschers, and E. van Wijngaarden, “Computational and Experimental Prediction of Propeller Cavitation Noise,” presented at the OCEANS2015, Genova, 2015
  3. J. Szantyr, P. Flaszyński, K. Tesch, W. Suchecki, and S. Alabrudziński, “An Experimental and Numerical Study of Tip Vortex Cavitation,” Pol. Marit. Res., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 14–22, 2012
  4. J.-H. Lee, J.-M. Han, H.-G. Park, and J.-S. Seo, “Application of signal processing techniques to the detection of tip vortex cavitation noise in marine propeller,” J. Hydrodyn. Ser B, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 440–449, Jul. 2013
  5. E. van Wijngaarden, J. Bosschers, and G. Kuiper, “Aspects of the Cavitating Propeller Tip Vortex as a Source of Inboard Noise and Vibration,” presented at the ASME 2005 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, 2005
  6. A. E. Raestad, “Tip Vortex Index - An Engineering Approach to Propeller Noise Prediction,” Nav. Archit., Aug. 1996
  7. ITTC, “27th ITTC Specialist Committee on Hydrodynamic Noise Final Report,” ITTC, 2012
  8. B. Taskar, S. Steen, and J. Eriksson, “Effect of waves on cavitation and pressure pulses of a tanker with twin podded propulsion,” Appl. Ocean Res., vol. 65, no. Supplement C, pp. 206–218, Apr. 2017
  9. S. Sezen, A. Dogrul, and Ş. Bal, “Tip Vortex Index (TVI) Technique for Inboard Propeller Noise Estimation,” GMO J. Ship Mar. Technol., no. 207, pp. 27–37, 2017
  10. P. Pennings, J. Westerweel, and T. van Terwisga, “Cavitation tunnel analysis of radiated sound from the resonance of a propeller tip vortex cavity,” Int. J. Multiph. Flow, vol. 83, no. Supplement C, pp. 1–11, Jul. 2016
  11. K. Park, H. Seol, W. Choi, and S. Lee, “Numerical prediction of tip vortex cavitation behavior and noise considering nuclei size and distribution,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 674–680, May 2009
  12. P. Pennings, J. Westerweel, and T. van Terwisga, “Sound signature of propeller tip vortex cavitation,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 656, no. 1, p. 012186, 2015
  13. Y. Wang, M. Abdel-Maksoud, K. Wang, and B. Song, “Prediction of tip vortex cavitation inception with low-order panel method,” Ocean Eng., vol. 125, no. Supplement C, pp. 124–133, Oct. 2016
  14. S. Ekinci, F. Celik, and M. Guner, “A Practical Noise Prediction Method for Cavita