KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 36 Sayı: 4

STRUCTURAL AND TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF PUMPED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS BY USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS

Mustafa GÜNDOĞAR
Cansu ORHAN
Mahmut FIRAT
Sayfa
961–976
Yayın Tarihi
2018-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is thought that the AHP model introduces significant innovations since it takes into consideration the variables to reflect and reveal the general state of the WSS.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Factors such as physical characteristics of pumps, transmission lines and tanks play an important role in operating and managing water supply systems (WSS).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The objective of this study is to carry out structural and technical performance evaluation for pumped-WSSs via Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is thought that the AHP model introduces significant innovations since it takes into consideration the variables to reflect and reveal the general state of the WSS.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Water supply · decision support systems · urban water systems

Abstract

Factors such as physical characteristics of pumps, transmission lines and tanks play an important role in operating and managing water supply systems (WSS). Therefore, it is required that these systems are evaluated by taking into consideration their current status. The objective of this study is to carry out structural and technical performance evaluation for pumped-WSSs via Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). For this purpose, main factors such as pumping station, structural condition and transmission line, sub-factors such as pump physical, operational characteristics, pump and water tank building etc. were considered. Weights for each factor were calculated based on pairwise comparison matrices of factors composited by opinions of the experts. The AHP model was applied to 10 pumped-water supply systems that currently provide service. It is thought that the AHP model introduces significant innovations since it takes into consideration the variables to reflect and reveal the general state of the WSS.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜNDOĞAR, M., ORHAN, C., FIRAT, M. (2018). STRUCTURAL AND TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF PUMPED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS BY USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Cilt: 36 Sayı: 4, 961–976. https://ajindex.com/articles/897671

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. ⦁ Cabrera E., Pardo M., Cobacho R., Cabrera Jr. E., (2010).
  2. Energy audit of water networks, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 136(1), 669–677. ⦁ Racoviceanu A.I., Karney B.W., (2010). Life-Cycle Perspective on Residential Water Conservation Strategies, Journal of Infrastructure Systems 16(1), 40–49. ⦁ Xu Q., Chen Q., Ma J., Blanckaert K., Wan Z., (2014). Water saving and energy reduction through pressure management in urban water distribution networks, Water Resources Management 28(11), 3715–3726. ⦁ Carriço N., Covas D., Alegre H., do Céu Almeida M., (2014). How to assess the effectiveness of energy management processes in water supply systems, Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology—AQUA 63(5), 342. ⦁ Mamade A., Sousa C., Marques A., Loureiro D., Alegre H., Covas D., (2015). Energy auditing as a tool for outlining major inefficiencies: Results from a real water supply system, Procedia Engineering 119(1), 1098–1108. ⦁ Scanlan M., Filion, Y. R., (2015). Application of energy use indicators to evaluate energy dynamics in Canadian water distribution systems, Procedia Engineering 119(1), 1039–1048. ⦁ Kuzman M. K., Grošelj P., Ayrilmis N., Zbašnik-Senegačnik M., (2013). Comparison of passive house construction types using analytic hierarchy process, Energy and Buildings 64, 258–263. ⦁ Gumusay M.U., Koseoglu G., Bakirman T., (2016) An assessment of site suitability for marina construction in Istanbul, Turkey, using GIS and AHP multicriteria decision analysis, Environ Monit Assess 188: 677. ⦁ Jeihouni, M., Toomanian, A., Shahabi, M., Alavipanah, S.K., 2014. Groundwater Qualıty Assessment For Drınkıng Purposes Usıng Gıs Modellıng (CASE STUDY: CITY OF TABRIZ), ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XL-2/W3, 163–168. ⦁ Özdemir Y., Tüysüz S., Başlıgil H., (2016). Weighting The Risks For Nuclear Power Plants Using AHP And ANP Methodologies, Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 7(2), 207-217. ⦁ Al-Barqawi H., Zayed T., (2008). Infrastructure Management: Integrated AHP/ANN Model To Evaluate Municipal Water Mains’ Performance, Journal Of Infrastructure Systems 14(4), 305–318. ⦁ Donevska K.R., Gorsevski P.V., Jovanovski M., Peševski I., (2012). Regional Non-Hazardous Landfill Site Selection By Integrating Fuzzy Logic, AHP And Geographic Information Systems. Environmental Earth Sciences, 67(1), 121–131. ⦁ Ennaouri I., Fuamba M., (2013). New Integrated Condition-Assessment