Dergiler / Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 38 Sayı: 4

ASSESSING ENVIRONMENTAL HOTSPOTS OF TIRE CURING PRESS: A LIFE CYCLE PERSPECTIVE

Sayfa
1825–1836
Yayın Tarihi
2021-10-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The study also reveals that the importance of the supply chain and lightweight design in LCA.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The machinery manufacturing sector is thought to be in a key position to achieve sustainable manufacturing because it uses large amounts of energy and raw materials.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The LCA methodology based on the ISO 14040 standard was conducted with SimaPro 8.0.4 software and the IMPACT 2002+ method.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The study also reveals that the importance of the supply chain and lightweight design in LCA.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2002 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Environmental impact · environmental hotspot · life cycle assessment

Abstract

The machinery manufacturing sector is thought to be in a key position to achieve sustainable manufacturing because it uses large amounts of energy and raw materials. The aim of this study is to determine the environmental hotspots of manufacturing the tire curing press (hydraulic) through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The LCA methodology based on the ISO 14040 standard was conducted with SimaPro 8.0.4 software and the IMPACT 2002+ method. A “cradle-to-gate” approach was performed and functional unit was selected as manufacturing of one piece of product. In the scope of the sensitivity anaylsis, different impact assessment methods (ReCiPe Midpoint (H), TRACI, CML-IA, and ILCD 2011 Midpoint) were also performed to verify and compare the results. Results showed that the significant environmental impacts were respiratory inorganics, global warming, and non-renewable energy during the manufacturing of tire curing press. When the manufacturing stages were taken into account, it is important to state that raw material consumption has the highest adverse effect on environment. The study also reveals that the importance of the supply chain and lightweight design in LCA.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇANKAYA, S., PEKEY, B. (2021). ASSESSING ENVIRONMENTAL HOTSPOTS OF TIRE CURING PRESS: A LIFE CYCLE PERSPECTIVE. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Cilt: 38 Sayı: 4, 1825–1836. https://ajindex.com/articles/897471

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. ⦁ Al-Yaseri, I. (2014). Qualitative and quantitative procedure for uncertainty analysis in life cycle assessment of wastewater solids treatment processes. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. ⦁ Akbari J, Oyamada K, Saito Y (2001) LCA of machine tools with regard to their secondary effects on quality of machined parts. In: Ecodesign, IEEE, pp 347. ⦁ Bueno C, Hauschild MZ, Rossignolo J.A, Ometto AR, & Mendes NC (2016) Sensitivity analysis of the use of Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods: a case study on building materials. J Clean Prod, 112: 2208-2220. ⦁ Brinksmeier E, Meyer D, Huesmann-Cordes AG, Herrmann C (2015) Metalworking fluids—Mechanisms and performance. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology. 64: 605–628. ⦁ Cao H, Li H, Cheng H, Luo Y, Yin R, Chen Y (2012) A carbon efficiency approach for life-cycle carbon emission characteristics of machine tools. J Clean Prod. 37: 19-28. ⦁ Carlson R, Häggström S, Pålsson AC (2003) LCA training package for users of LCA data and results. Industrial Environmental Informatics Chalmers University of Technology. ⦁ Clarens AF, Zimmerman JB, Keoleian GA, Hayes KF, Skerlos SJ (2008). Comparison of life cycle emissions and energy consumption for environmentally adapted metalworking fluid systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42.(22): 8534-8540. ⦁ Çankaya S, Pekey B (2015) Identifying environmental impacts of cement production with life cycle assessment: literature review. J. Int. Sci. Publ., 9: 251-267. ⦁ Dahmus JB, Gutowski TG (2004) An Environmental Analysis of Machining. Proceedings of IMECE2004. ⦁ De Feo G, Ferrara C, Iuliano C, Grosso A (2016) LCA of the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of source separated municipal waste: A Southern Italy case study. Sustainability, 8(11): 1084. ⦁ Du Y, Yi Q, Li C, Liao L (2015) Life cycle oriented low-carbon operation models of machinery manufacturing industry. J Clean Prod., 91: 145-157. ⦁ EMRA (Energy Market Regulatory Authorities) (2018). Turkey's energy profile and strategy. Available online: ⦁ http://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkeys-energy-strategy.en.mfa (2018), Accessed 19 Aug 2019. ⦁ Fratila D. (2010) Macro-level environmental comparison of near-dry machining and flood machining. J Clean Prod., 18: 1031-1039. ⦁ Gao M, Li X, Huang H, Liu Z, Li L, Zhou D (2016) Energy-saving Methods for Hydraulic Presses Based on Energy Dissipation Analysis. Procedia CIRP, 48: 331 – 335. ⦁ Goedkoop, M., Oele, M., Leijting, J., Ponsioen, T., & Meijer, E. (2016). Introduction to LCA wi