KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences / 2023 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Deep learning-based vehicle detection from orthophoto and spatial accuracy analysis

Muhammed Yahya BİYİK
Muhammed Enes ATİK
Zaide DURAN
Sayfa
138–145
Yayın Tarihi
2023-07-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

F1-score is 80% for YOLOv3 and 85% for YOLOv4-CSP.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Deep Learning algorithms are used by many different disciplines for various purposes, thanks to their ever-developing data processing skills.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For these reasons, v3 and v4 versions of the YOLO algorithm, which prioritizes detecting the midpoint of the detected object, were trained in Google Colab’s virtual machine environment using the prepared data set.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:F1-score is 80% for YOLOv3 and 85% for YOLOv4-CSP.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:UAV · Photogrammetry · Deep Learning

Abstract

Deep Learning algorithms are used by many different disciplines for various purposes, thanks to their ever-developing data processing skills. Convolutional neural network (CNN) are generally developed and used for this integration purpose. On the other hand, the widespread usage of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) enables the collection of aerial photographs for Photogrammetric studies. In this study, these two fields were brought together and it was aimed to find the equivalents of the objects detected from the UAV images using deep learning in the global coordinate system and to evaluate their accuracy over these values. For these reasons, v3 and v4 versions of the YOLO algorithm, which prioritizes detecting the midpoint of the detected object, were trained in Google Colab’s virtual machine environment using the prepared data set. The coordinate values read from the orthophoto and the coordinate values of the midpoints of the objects, which were derived according to the estimations made by the YOLO-v3 and YOLOV4-CSP models, were compared and their spatial accuracy was calculated. Accuracy of 16.8 cm was obtained with the YOLO-v3 and 15.5 cm with the YOLOv4-CSP. In addition, the mAP value was obtained as 80% for YOLOv3 and 87% for YOLOv4-CSP. F1-score is 80% for YOLOv3 and 85% for YOLOv4-CSP.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BİYİK, M. Y., ATİK, M. E., DURAN, Z. (2023). Deep learning-based vehicle detection from orthophoto and spatial accuracy analysis. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 138–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/886479

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Luo, X., Tian, X., Zhang, H., Hou, W., Leng, G., Xu, W.,. & Zhang, J. (2020). Fast automatic vehicle detection in uav images using convolutional neural networks. Remote Sensing, 12(12), 1994.
  2. Lu, J., Ma, C., Li, L., Xing, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., & Xu, J. (2018). A vehicle detection method for aerial image based on YOLO. Journal of Computer and Communications, 6(11), 98-107.
  3. Sang, J., Wu, Z., Guo, P., Hu, H., Xiang, H., Zhang, Q., & Cai, B. (2018). An improved YOLOv2 for vehicle detection. Sensors, 18(12), 4272. Jazayeri, A., Cai, H., Zheng, J. Y., & Tuceryan, M. (2011). Vehicle detection and tracking in car video based on motion model. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12(2), 583-595.
  4. Senkal, E., Kaplan, G., & Avdan, U. (2021). Accuracy assessment of digital surface models from unmanned aerial vehicles’ imagery on archaeological sites. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 6(2), 81-89. Şasi A., & Yakar, M. (2018). Photogrammetric modelling of hasbey dar'ülhuffaz (masjid) using an unmanned aerial vehicle. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 3(1), 6-11.
  5. Ulvi, A., Yakar, M., Yigit, A. Y., & Kaya, Y. (2020). İha ve Yersel Fotogrametrik Teknikler Kullanarak Aksaray Kızıl Kilisenin 3b Modelinin ve Nokta Bulutunun Elde Edilmesi. Geomatik, 5(1), 19-26.
  6. Gönültaş, F., Atik, M. E. & Duran, Z. (2020). Extraction of Roof Planes from Different Point Clouds Using RANSAC Algorithm. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 7 (2), 165-171. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.715510
  7. Atik, M. E., Donmez, S. O., Duran, Z., & İpbuker, C. (2018). Comparison Of Automatic Feature Extraction Methods for Building Roof Planes by Using Airborne Lidar Data and High-Resolution Satellite Image. In Proceedings, 7th International Conference on Cartography and GIS (pp. 857-863), 18-23 June 2018,
  8. Sozopol, Bulgaria. Ulvi, A., Yakar, M., Yiğit, A. Y. & Kaya, Y. (2020). İha ve Yersel Fotogrametrik Teknikler Kullanarak Aksaray Kızıl Kilisenin 3b Modelinin ve Nokta Bulutunun Elde Edilmesi. Geomatik, 5 (1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.560179
  9. Agca. M., Gültekin, N., & Kaya, E. (2020). İnsansız hava aracından elde edilen veriler ile kaya düşme potansiyelinin değerlendirilmesi: Adam Kayalar örneği, Mersin. Geomatik, 5(2), 134-145.
  10. Alptekin, A. & Yakar, M. (2020). Determination of pond volume with using an unmanned aerial vehicle. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 2 (2), 59-63.
  11. Aykut, N. O. (2019). İnsansız Hava Araçlar