KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Dilbilim / 2022 / Sayı: 39

Mis/disinformation on COVID-19 in Social Media Narratives in Nigeria and Iraq: An Exploratory Investigation of their Linguistic Features from Pragmatic Perspectives

Ahmed Mohammed Bedu(University of Maiduguri, Languages and Linguistics Department, Borno State, Nigeria)0000-0001-7144-7158
Hind İsmail(University of Anbar, College of Education for Women, Ramdi, Iraq)0000-0002-1878-8823
Sayfa
89–103
Yayın Tarihi
2023-02-03
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In rendering a pragmatic explanation for why certain social media narratives on COVID-19 mis/disinform, the study findings reveal that there are linguistic features in the misinformed and disinformed contents that aid the manipulation of information to give partial information or prevent the eventuality in which the information content can be tagged as a total lie.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The outbreak of Coronavirus 2019, known as COVID-19, has stimulated social unrest in all nations and at the same time has facilitated the spread of mis/ disinformation about the pandemic in both mainstream and new media.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The fact-checking research that many researchers utilise to authenticate the source of this mis/disinformation about the plague focuses little or no attention on linguistic phenomena in the COVID-19 narratives in the social media discourse.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In rendering a pragmatic explanation for why certain social media narratives on COVID-19 mis/disinform, the study findings reveal that there are linguistic features in the misinformed and disinformed contents that aid the manipulation of information to give partial information or prevent the eventuality in which the information content can be tagged as a total lie.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Misinformation · Disinformation · COVID-19

Özet

The outbreak of Coronavirus 2019, known as COVID-19, has stimulated social unrest in all nations and at the same time has facilitated the spread of mis/ disinformation about the pandemic in both mainstream and new media. It has also stimulated various research works that have investigated mis/disinformation on the pandemic, especially the social media narratives, through various factchecking mechanisms. The fact-checking research that many researchers utilise to authenticate the source of this mis/disinformation about the plague focuses little or no attention on linguistic phenomena in the COVID-19 narratives in the social media discourse. The present paper, which deploys the qualitative method of analysis of information manipulation theory (IMT), investigates the linguistic features of mis/disinformation about COVID-19 from the data drawn from various social media platforms in Nigeria and Iraq. The research findings attempt to answer two research questions: Is mis/disinformation about COVID-19 detectable in the social media discourse pragmatically? Does mis/ disinformation about the pandemic contains any linguistic features which language users utilise to achieve their intended communicative action? The findings, which show that IMT offers a multidimensional approach to the investigation of misinformation and disinformation about COVID-19, indicate that misinformation and disinformation can be detectable from non-observation of Grice's (1989) conversational implicature principles. In rendering a pragmatic explanation for why certain social media narratives on COVID-19 mis/disinform, the study findings reveal that there are linguistic features in the misinformed and disinformed contents that aid the manipulation of information to give partial information or prevent the eventuality in which the information content can be tagged as a total lie.

Abstract

The outbreak of Coronavirus 2019, known as COVID-19, has stimulated social unrest in all nations and at the same time has facilitated the spread of mis/ disinformation about the pandemic in both mainstream and new media. It has also stimulated various research works that have investigated mis/disinformation on the pandemic, especially the social media narratives, through various factchecking mechanisms. The fact-checking research that many researchers utilise to authenticate the source of this mis/disinformation about the plague focuses little or no attention on linguistic phenomena in the COVID-19 narratives in the social media discourse. The present paper, which deploys the qualitative method of analysis of information manipulation theory (IMT), investigates the linguistic features of mis/disinformation about COVID-19 from the data drawn from various social media platforms in Nigeria and Iraq. The research findings attempt to answer two research questions: Is mis/disinformation about COVID-19 detectable in the social media discourse pragmatically? Does mis/ disinformation about the pandemic contains any linguistic features which language users utilise to achieve their intended communicative action? The findings, which show that IMT offers a multidimensional approach to the investigation of misinformation and disinformation about COVID-19, indicate that misinformation and disinformation can be detectable from non-observation of Grice's (1989) conversational implicature principles. In rendering a pragmatic explanation for why certain social media narratives on COVID-19 mis/disinform, the study findings reveal that there are linguistic features in the misinformed and disinformed contents that aid the manipulation of information to give partial information or prevent the eventuality in which the information content can be tagged as a total lie.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Bedu, A. M., İsmail, H. (2023). Mis/disinformation on COVID-19 in Social Media Narratives in Nigeria and Iraq: An Exploratory Investigation of their Linguistic Features from Pragmatic Perspectives. Dilbilim, Sayı: 39, 89–103. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2022.1185466

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (23)

  1. Africa Resilience Network, ARN (2021). Combating covid-19 misinformation in Nigeria: A compendium of selected stories from the ARN project. Abuja: Authorpedia Publishers. Retrieved from https://www.icirnigeria. org/icirup/2021/09/ENGLISH-COMBATING-COVID-19-MISINFORMATION-IN-NIGERIA.pdf google scholar
  2. Bedu, A. M. (2017). Semantico-pragmatic interrelation of editorials and their headlines in English-speaking Nigerian newspapers, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis Süleyman Demirel Üniversity, Isparta. google scholar
  3. Bedu, A.M., & Thamer, A.A. (2022). A semantic evaluation of ideological positioning in awareness campaign against Covid-19 pandemic in Nigeria and Iraq from appraisal framework perspective. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 159-168. Doi: 10.52462/jlls.172. google scholar
  4. Bowers, J.W., Elliott, N.D., & Desmond, R.J. (1977). Exploiting pragmatic rules: Devious messages. Human Communication Research, 3, 235-2 google scholar Charteris-Black, J. (2021). Metaphors of coronavirus: Invisible enemy or zombie apocalypse? Cham: Palgrave Macmillan google scholar
  5. Chen, K., Luo, Y.; Hu, A., Zhao, J. & Zhang L. (2021). Characteristics of misinformation spreading on social media during the covid-19 outbreak in China: A descriptive analysis, Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 2021:14 1869-1879. google scholar
  6. Chilton, P. (2004). Analyzing political discourse: theory and practice. London: Routledge. google scholar
  7. Cinelli M, Quattrociocchi W, Galeazzi A, Valensise CM, Brugnoli E, Schmidt AL, Zola P, Zollo F, & Scala A.(2020). The covid-19 social media infodemic. Sci Rep.;10(1):16598. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5. PMID: 33024152; PMCID: PMC7538912. google scholar
  8. Grice, H. P. 1975. “Logic and conversation”, in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3: Speech Acts, Academic Press, New York. 41-58 google scholar
  9. Grice, H. P. 1978. Some further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics (pp. 113-128). New York: Academic Press. google scholar
  10. Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the ways with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. google scholar
  11. Guess, A. M. & Lyon, B. (2020). ‘Misinformation, disinformation, and online propaganda’ In google scholar
  12. Persily, N. & Tucker, J. A. (eds.) Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform.London: University of Cambridge P. 10-33 google scholar
  13. Ibrahim, B. and Sulaiman, A. (2020). Semiotic communication: An approach of understanding a meaning in communication, International Journal of Media and Communication Research Volume 1 (1): 22-32. google scholar
  14. Jack, C. (2017). Lexicon of lies: Terms for problematic information. Data & Society, 3, 22. google scholar
  15. Katermina, V. & Yachenko, E. (2020). Axiology of covid-19 as a linguistic phenomenon in English mass media discourse. Advances in Journalism and Communication, 2020, 8, 59-67. DOI: 10.4236/ajc.2020.82005 google scholar
  16. Linden D,, Lasorsa, D. L. &. Lewis, S. C. (2009) The news readability problem, Journalism Practice, 3:1, 1-12, DOI: 10.1080/17512780802560708 google scholar
  17. McCornack, S. (1992). Information manipulation theory Communication Monographs 59(1):1-16. doi: 10.1080/03637759209376245 google scholar
  18. Metts, S. (1989). An exploratory investigation of deception in close relationships, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 159-180. google scholar
  19. Metts, S., & Chronis, H. (1986). An exploratory investigation of relational deception. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL. google scholar
  20. Sperber, D. (2000). Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In D. Sperber D. (2000). (ed.), Metarepresentations: A multidisciplinary perspective. (Oxford University Press), 117-137 google scholar
  21. Starbird, K., Arif, A., & Wilson, T. (2019). Disinformation as collaborative work: Surfacing the participatory nature of strategic information operations. Proceedings of the ACM on Human Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1-26. google scholar
  22. Stewart, M. (2021). Defending weapons inspections from the effects of disinformation. American Journal of International Law, 115, 106-110. google scholar Wahl-Jorgensen, Andrew W., Richard, S., Janet H., Garcia-Blanco, I., Dencik, L., Stephen C., Carter, C., & Stuart A. (2016). the future ofjournalism. Journalism Practice 10 (7): 808-814. google scholar
  23. Wilson, T., & Starbird, K. (2020). Cross-platform disinformation campaigns: lessons learned and next steps. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(1), 1-13. google scholar