Dergiler / European Oral Research / 2022 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 3

Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of sphenoid sinus in different sagittal skeletal pattern

Sayfa
143–148
Yayın Tarihi
2022-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The sphenoid sinus pneumatization did not differ significantly in patients exhibiting different types of sagittal skeletal closure, with the exception of the lesser wing type.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore sphenoid sinus variations in individuals with various sagittal skeletal anomalies using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed sphenoid sinus pneumatization on CBCT images of 126 patients aged 18–86 years.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The sphenoid sinus pneumatization did not differ significantly in patients exhibiting different types of sagittal skeletal closure, with the exception of the lesser wing type.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Sphenoid sinus · cone beam computed tomography · anatomy

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore sphenoid sinus variations in individuals with various sagittal skeletal anomalies using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed sphenoid sinus pneumatization on CBCT images of 126 patients aged 18–86 years. The anteroposterior skeletal relationships of the maxilla and mandible were classified as skeletal class I, II or III using the A point–nasion–B point (ANB) angle measured in the sagittal plane. The extensions of the sphenoid sinus were evaluated on three planes including axial, sagittal and coronal sections. Results The study population consisted of 84 females (66.7%) and 42 males (33.3%), including 52 (41.3%) class I, 38 (30.1%) class II, and 36 (28.6%) class III cases. The conchal type of sphenoid sinus was not encountered. Presellar sinuses were detected in only 3 (5.8%) class I cases. Incomplete sinuses were detected in 16 (30.8%) class I, 7 (18.4%) class II, and 15 (41.7%) class III cases. Complete sinuses were detected in 33 (63.4%) class I, 31 (81.6%) class II, and 21 (58.3%) class III cases. Lateral extensions were found in 103 (40.9%) of the 252 sinus walls: 33 (31.7%) in class I, 45 (59.2%) in class II, and 25 (34.7%) in class III sinuses. Conclusion Regional sphenoid sinus anatomy can be carefully examined via CBCT. The sphenoid sinus pneumatization did not differ significantly in patients exhibiting different types of sagittal skeletal closure, with the exception of the lesser wing type.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YESİLTEPE, S., KURTULDU, E., BAYRAKDAR, İ. Ş., YILMAZ, A. B. (2022). Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of sphenoid sinus in different sagittal skeletal pattern. European Oral Research, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 3, 143–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/881757

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Štoković N, Trkulja V, Dumić-Čule I et al. Sphenoid sinus types, dimensions and relationship with surrounding structures. Ann Anat-Anatomischer Anzeiger. 2016
  2. Fujioka M, Young LW. The sphenoidal sinuses: radiographic patterns of normal development and abnormal findings in infants and children. Radiology 1978
  3. 129(1):133-6. 3. Tan HK, Ong Y, Teo MS, Fook-Chong S. The development of sphenoid sinus in Asian children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003
  4. 67(12):1295-302. 4. Wang J, Bidari S, Inoue K, Yang H, Rhoton Jr A. Extensions of the sphenoid sinus: a new classification. Neurosurgery 2010
  5. 66(4):797-816. 5. Cheung D, Attia E, Kirkpatrick D, Marcarian B, Wright B. An anatomic and CT scan study of the lateral wall of the sphenoid sinus as related to the transnasal transethmoid endoscopic approach. J Otolaryngol 1993
  6. 22(2):63-8. 6. Mafee MF, Chow JM, Meyers R. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: anatomy, CT screening, indications, and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993
  7. 160(4):735-44. 7. DeLano MC, Fun F, Zinreich SJ. Relationship of the optic nerve to the posterior paranasal sinuses: a CT anatomic study. Am J Neuroradiol 1996
  8. Yune HY, Holden RW, Smith JA. Normal variations and lesions of the sphenoid sinus. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1975
  9. 124(1):129-38. 9. Liu S, Wang Z, Zhou B, Yang B, Fan E, Li Y. Related structures of the lateral sphenoid wall anatomy studies in CT and MRI. Lin chuang er bi yan hou ke za zhi= J Clin Otorhinolaryngol 2002
  10. 16(8):407-9. 10. Simonetti G, Meloni F, Teatini G et al. Computed tomography of the ethmoid labyrinth and adjacent structures. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987
  11. 96(3):239-50. 11. Kinnman J. Surgical aspects of the anatomy of the sphenoidal sinuses and the sella turcica. J Anat 1977
  12. 124(Pt 3):541. 12. Hamid O, El Fiky L, Hassan O, Kotb A, El Fiky S. Anatomic variations of the sphenoid sinus and their impact on trans-sphenoid pituitary surgery. Skull base 2008
  13. 18(01):009-15. 13. Perondi GE, Isolan GR, de Aguiar PHP, Stefani MA, Falcetta EF. Endoscopic anatomy of sellar region. Pituitary 2013
  14. 16(2):251-9. 14. Hammer G, Rådberg C. The sphenoidal sinus: an anatomical and roentgenologic study with reference to transsphenoid hypophysectomy. Acta Radiol 1961(6):401-22. 15. Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, de Divitiis E. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurgery 2004
  15. 55(4):933-41. 16. Cappabianca P, Cavallo L, Esposito F, De Divitiis O, Messina A, De Divitiis E. Extended endoscopi