KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Economy Culture and Society / 2022 / Sayı: 66

Social Capital Measurement in Turkiye: Creating an Index by Province

Abdulmuttalip PİLATİN
Hasan AYAYDIN
Sayfa
235–259
Yayın Tarihi
2023-01-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

When the social capital index values of 2007 and 2018 are examined, it is observed that the social capital levels of the provinces have increased over the years, although there has not been much change in the index values on a provincial basis over the years.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of the study is to create a social capital index on the basis of 81 provinces covering the years between 2007-2018 in Turkiye.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:While creating the social capital index, the method of creating the social capital index obtained from 2 networks and 2 norm variables, which was also used in previous studies, was applied.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:When the social capital index values of 2007 and 2018 are examined, it is observed that the social capital levels of the provinces have increased over the years, although there has not been much change in the index values on a provincial basis over the years.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2007-2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Social Capital Index · Principal Component Analysis · Linear Interpolation

Abstract

The aim of the study is to create a social capital index on the basis of 81 provinces covering the years between 2007-2018 in Turkiye. While creating the social capital index, the method of creating the social capital index obtained from 2 networks and 2 norm variables, which was also used in previous studies, was applied. While the number of foundations and associations on a provincial basis was used as network variables, the rate of voting in parliamentary elections and the rate of response to WVS surveys were used as norm variables. In order to perform principal component analysis, the collected data was entered into the SPSS 23 package program, and the relevant analysis was performed. For this purpose, principal component analysis was applied for the years 2007, 2011, and 2018, when parliamentary general elections were held, and the first component that emerged was taken as an indicator of social capital index. Since social capital does not change in a short period of time for countries, regions, and cities, the index values for the years between 2007, 2011 and 2018 were created with the linear interpolation method using the data, as applied in similar studies. Positive ones among the index values created on the basis of provinces indicate a high level of social capital, while negative values indicate a low level of social capital. When the social capital index values of 2007 and 2018 are examined, it is observed that the social capital levels of the provinces have increased over the years, although there has not been much change in the index values on a provincial basis over the years.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

PİLATİN, A., AYAYDIN, H. (2023). Social Capital Measurement in Turkiye: Creating an Index by Province. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Sayı: 66, 235–259. https://ajindex.com/articles/876912

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Adam, F., & Roncevic, B. (2003). Social capital: Recent debates and research trends. Social Science Information, 42, 155-183. google scholar Akar, T., & Ay, A. (2018). The effect of social capital and innovation on economic growth. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 58, 105-126. google scholar Akçomak S. İ., & Weel, B. (2009). Social capital, innovation and growth: Evidence from Europe. European Economic Review, 53, 544-567. google scholar Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2000). Participation in heterogeneous communities. Q. J.Econ. 115, 847-904. google scholar Baker, W. (1990). Market networks and corporate behaviour. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 589-625. google scholar Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120. google scholar Bayramoğlu, Z., & Bozdemir, M. (2020). Kırsal alanda sosyal sermaye oluşumunun sürdürülebilir kalkınmaya etkisi. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research (TURKAGER), 1(1), 179-189. google scholar Bj0rnskov, C. (2007). Determinants of generalized trust: A cross-country comparison. Public Choice, 130(1-2), 1-21. google scholar Bourdieu, P. (1986).
  2. The forms of capital. In Richardson, J.G. (Ed.). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, 241-258.
  3. New York, USA: Greenwood Press. google scholar Burt, S. R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. England: Harvard University Press. google scholar Burt, S. R. (2005).
  4. Brokerage and closure. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. google scholar Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı; istatistik, araştırma deseni SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. (8. Press) Ankara:
  5. Baran Ofset. google scholar Cohen, D., & L. Prusak (2001). In good company, how social capital makes organizations work. Boston, USA: Harvard Business School Press google scholar Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge Mass., USA: Harvard University Press. google scholar Dasgupta, P. (2000). Economic progress and the idea of social capital, in Dasgupta, P. and Serageldin, I. (eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective, The World Bank: Washington, D.C. google scholar Davaadorj, Z. (2019). Does social capital affect dividend policy? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 22, 116-128. google scholar Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Re