Dergiler / Industrial Policy / 2022 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

The Effects of Economic Policy Choices on Industrialization in Turkiye

Sayfa
55–62
Yayın Tarihi
2022-12-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Aiming for short-term economic growth through wrong macroeconomic policy choices, the country moves away from ensuring long-term economic growth and economic development through industrialization based on technological development, and the whole economy faces increasing risks.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study examines the impact of Turkiye's economic policy choices on industrialization since the Global Crisis.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study concludes that such choices were shaped in parallel with the global economy until 2019.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Aiming for short-term economic growth through wrong macroeconomic policy choices, the country moves away from ensuring long-term economic growth and economic development through industrialization based on technological development, and the whole economy faces increasing risks.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:industrialization · Economic policy · Turkish economy

Abstract

This study examines the impact of Turkiye's economic policy choices on industrialization since the Global Crisis. For the study period, TurkStat and World Bank data on the main industrial sector indicators such as production, value added, exports and imports, and technology intensity were used. The study concludes that such choices were shaped in parallel with the global economy until 2019. In terms of the second observation, the relationship between economic policy preferences and industrialization, industrialization increases during periods of protectionist economic policies, and although the industrial sector loses its top priority during periods of liberal economic policies, increased integration with the world economy and private sector entrepreneurship add momentum to industrialization. The third observation is that the structural problems of the Turkish economy lead to economic instability and adversely affect industrialization, regardless of the choice of economic policy. The fourth observation is that after the Global Crisis of 2008, global competition has been increasingly based on technology, an area where Turkiye lags behind. Aiming for short-term economic growth through wrong macroeconomic policy choices, the country moves away from ensuring long-term economic growth and economic development through industrialization based on technological development, and the whole economy faces increasing risks.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜR, B. (2022). The Effects of Economic Policy Choices on Industrialization in Turkiye. Industrial Policy, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 55–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/873466

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Bhagwati, J. (1986). Rethinking trade strategy. Oxford Overseas Development Council. Boratav, K. (1998). Türkiye iktisat tarihi 1908-1985. Istanbul: Gerçek. Cengiz, V. & Öruç, E. (2016). Sanayi üretimi ve politikalar. In Türkiye ekonomisinin dönüşümü. (ed. Erdoğan, S. & Gedikli, A.) Kocaeli: Umuttepe. Clark, C. (1940). The conditions of economic progress. London: Macmillan and Co. European Commission (2008). Statistical classification of economic activities in the European community. Luxembourg. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5902521/KS-RA-07-015-EN.PDF Accessed 20 September 2022
  2. Eşsiz, F.P. & Özdemir, M.G. (2013). Osmanlı’dan ikibinli yıllara Türkiye’nin ekonomik tarihi: Tarihsel ve sektörel analiz. (ed. Dikkaya, M., Üzümcü, A. & Özyakışır, D.) Ankara:
  3. Savaş. Fisher, A.G.B. (1939). Production, primary, secondary and tertiary. Economic Record, 15(1), 24-38. doi:10.1111/j.1475- 4932.1939.tb01015.x Gür, B. (2006). Sanayi planlarının hazırlanmasına temel teşkil eden raporlar. Öneri: Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(25), 201-219.
  4. Gürsel, S. (2013). Türkiye ekonomisinde büyüme ve yapısal sorunlar: BETAM Araştırma Notları: 2008-2012. Istanbul: BAU. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/ Accessed 20 September 2022 https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=dis-ticaret-104 Accessed 20 September 2022 https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators Accessed 20 September 2022 https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database Accessed 20 September 2022
  5. Kaldor, N. (1966). Causes of the slow rate of economic growth of the United Kingdom: An inaugural lecture. Cambridge University Press.
  6. Karluk, R. (2014). Türkiye ekonomisi: Cumhuriyet’in ilanından günümüze yapısal dönüşüm. (13th ed.). Ankara:
  7. Beta. Kazgan, G. (2000). İktisadi düşünce veya politik iktisadın evrimi (9th ed.). Istanbul: Remzi. Levi-Faur, D. (1997). Friedrich List and the political economy of the nation-state. Review of International Political Economy, 4(1), 154-178.
  8. Minibaş, T. (1992). Az gelişmiş ülkelerde kalkınmanın finansman politikaları ve Türkiye. Istanbul: Der. Mosconi, F. (2015). The new industrial policy: Global competitiveness and the manufacturing renaissance. New York, Routledge. Şahin, H. (2016). Türkiye ekonomisi tarihsel gelişimi-bugünkü durumu. Bursa: Ezgi. Turanlı, R. (2011). İktisadi düşünce tarihi. Istanbul: Bilim Teknik. TurkStat (2022). Haber bülteni: Tüketici fiyat endeksi. No. 45798 (September). Ankara.
  9. Yenal, O. (2013). Cumhuriyet’in ik