KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Menba Kastamonu Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of Meat Yield and Proximate Composition of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Grown in Concrete Ponds and Cages of Two Farms in Two Different Provinces of Turkey

Mustafa ÇIKRIKÇI
Mahmut Ali GÖKÇE
Mehmet ÇELİK
Aygül KÜÇÜKGÜLMEZ
Sayfa
105–113
Yayın Tarihi
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The ash content did not differ between groups.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, it was aimed to compare meat yields and nutrient contents of male and female rainbow trout individuals obtained from pond and cage units of two fish farms located in two provinces, Kayseri and Kahramanmaraş, Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The results showed that the highest meat yield was in female individuals reared in the pond unit of the farm in Kahramanmaraş with 55.70% and the lowest meat yield was in male individuals reared in the pond unit of the farm in Kayseri with 47.17%.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The ash content did not differ between groups.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Rainbow Trout · Oncorhynchus mykiss · condition factor

Özet

In this study, it was aimed to compare meat yields and nutrient contents of male and female rainbow trout individuals obtained from pond and cage units of two fish farms located in two provinces, Kayseri and Kahramanmaraş, Turkey. The results showed that the highest meat yield was in female individuals reared in the pond unit of the farm in Kahramanmaraş with 55.70% and the lowest meat yield was in male individuals reared in the pond unit of the farm in Kayseri with 47.17%. When all males and females were compared, it was determined that female individuals had higher meat yield and no significant differences were found between pond and cage groups. The highest condition factor (1.55) was found in the Kahramanmaraş cage male group, while there was no significant difference in other groups. HSI values were higher in male individuals and VSI values were higher in the cage groups. Protein values were found to be higher in females. The highest protein contents were determined in the Kahramanmaraş cage female (20.16%), Kahramanmaraş pond female (20.11%), and Kayseri cage female (19.89%) groups. Moreover, the highest lipid values were found in the Kahramanmaraş cage male (7.36%) and Kahramanmaraş pond male (7.16%) groups. The highest moisture was observed in the Kayseri pond male group with 75.84%. The ash content did not differ between groups.

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to compare meat yields and nutrient contents of male and female rainbow trout individuals obtained from pond and cage units of two fish farms located in two provinces, Kayseri and Kahramanmaraş, Turkey. The results showed that the highest meat yield was in female individuals reared in the pond unit of the farm in Kahramanmaraş with 55.70% and the lowest meat yield was in male individuals reared in the pond unit of the farm in Kayseri with 47.17%. When all males and females were compared, it was determined that female individuals had higher meat yield and no significant differences were found between pond and cage groups. The highest condition factor (1.55) was found in the Kahramanmaraş cage male group, while there was no significant difference in other groups. HSI values were higher in male individuals and VSI values were higher in the cage groups. Protein values were found to be higher in females. The highest protein contents were determined in the Kahramanmaraş cage female (20.16%), Kahramanmaraş pond female (20.11%), and Kayseri cage female (19.89%) groups. Moreover, the highest lipid values were found in the Kahramanmaraş cage male (7.36%) and Kahramanmaraş pond male (7.16%) groups. The highest moisture was observed in the Kayseri pond male group with 75.84%. The ash content did not differ between groups.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇIKRIKÇI, M., GÖKÇE, M. A., ÇELİK, M., KÜÇÜKGÜLMEZ, A. (2022). Comparison of Meat Yield and Proximate Composition of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Grown in Concrete Ponds and Cages of Two Farms in Two Different Provinces of Turkey. Menba Kastamonu Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 105–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/869958

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis 15th. Ed. Association of the Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC, USA. Alexis, M.N., Theochari, V. & Papaparaskeva Papoutsoglou, E. (1986). Effect of Diet Composition and Protein Level on Growth, Body Composition, Haematological Characteristics and Cost of Production of Rainbow Trout (Salmo gairdneri). Aquaculture, 58, 75-85.
  2. Arıman, H. & Aras, M.N. (2003). Çeşitli Yem Gruplarının Alabalık (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum, 1792) Yavrularının Büyüme Performansına ve Et Verimi Özelliklerine Etkileri. Ege Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Dergisi, 20(3-4), 405-411.
  3. Baki, B., Gönener, S. & Kaya, D. 2015. Comparison of food, amino acid and fatty acid compositions of wild and cultivated sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L., 1758). Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 15, 175–179.
  4. Beyter, N. (2008). Farklı Ticari Yemle Beslenen Gökkuşağı Alabalıklarının (Onchorhynchus mykiss) Büyüme Performansina, Balık Eti Bileşimine ve Yağ Asitleri Profiline Etkisi. Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  5. Bligh, E.G. & Dyer,W.J. (1959). A Rapid Method of Total Lipid Extraction and Purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology, 37, 911-917.
  6. Bosworth, B.G. & Wolters, W.R. (2004).
  7. Comparison of Production, Meat Yield, and Meat Quality Traits of NWAC103 Line Channel Catfish, NorrisLine Channel Catfish, and Female Channel Catfish 3 Male Blue Catfish F1 Hybrids. North American Journal of Aquaculture, 66, 177–183.
  8. Burkert, D., Andrade, D.R., Sirol, R.N., Salaro, A.L., Rasguido, J.A. & Quirino, C.R. (2008). Processing Yield and Chemical Composition of Fillets of Surubimreared in net Cages. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 37(7), 1137-1143.
  9. Bugeon, J., Lefevre, F., Cardinal, M., Uyanik, A., Davenel, A. & Haffray, P. (2010). Flesh quality in large rainbow trout with high or low fillet yield. Journal of Muscle Foods, 21(4), 702–721.
  10. Çelik, T. & Kızak, V. (2018). Farklı Yetiştiricilik Sistemlerinden Hasat Edilen Gökkuşağı Alabalığının (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Et Verimi ve Besin Kompozisyonu. International Journal of Pure Applied Sciences, 4(2), 117-123.
  11. Çelik, M., Gökçe, M.A., Başusta, N., Küçükgülmez, A., Taşbozan, O. & Tabakoğlu, Ş.S. (2008). Nutritional Quality of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Caught from the Atatürk Dam Lake in Turkey. Journal of Muscle Foods, 19, 50-61.
  12. Danabaş, D. (2009). Farkli Oranlardaki Zeolit (klinoptilolit)’in Bazi Su Parametreleri İle Gökkuşaği Alabaliği (Oncorhynchus mykiss walbaum, 1792)’nin