Dergiler / European Food Science and Engineering / 2022 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Vegan and gluten-free granola bar production with pumpkin

Sayfa
52–57
Yayın Tarihi
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The formulation with the highest acceptability value (0.884) was determined as the sample containing 75.79 g of banana and 184.21 g of pumpkin.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study is to produce a functional product for diets that arise due to preferences such as vegan diet or health problems such as celiac, with the increase of consumer awareness.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For this purpose, 7 different formulations were prepared using design expert.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The formulation with the highest acceptability value (0.884) was determined as the sample containing 75.79 g of banana and 184.21 g of pumpkin.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Gluten-free · Functional food · Granola bar

Abstract

The aim of this study is to produce a functional product for diets that arise due to preferences such as vegan diet or health problems such as celiac, with the increase of consumer awareness. For this purpose, bars containing various fruits, dried fruits, nuts and spices were produced. For this purpose, 7 different formulations were prepared using design expert. While the ratio of pumpkin and banana was changed in the mixture, the ratios of other ingredients (oats, raisins, cranberries, pumpkin seeds, coconut oil, spice mix, flaxseed) were kept constant. It was determined that the protein content of the bars increased as the amount of pumpkin increased. In the sensory analysis, the gluten-free bars produced were appreciated by the panelists. There was no statistical difference in the ash content, moisture content, oil content and L*, a*, b*, C* color values of the gluten-free bars. The samples were optimized considering their protein content and sensory properties. The formulation with the highest acceptability value (0.884) was determined as the sample containing 75.79 g of banana and 184.21 g of pumpkin.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MANGULDAR, F., DERYA, B., BALBİNAR, S., ÇAKIR, Ş., ICYER, N. C., ÇAYIR, M., TOKER, Ö. S., ŞENTÜRK, B. (2022). Vegan and gluten-free granola bar production with pumpkin. European Food Science and Engineering, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 52–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/868071

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Alarcon-Aguilara, F.J., Roman-Ramos, R., Perez-Gutierrez, S., Aguilar-Contreras, A., Contreras-Weber, C.C., & Flores-Saenz, J.L. (1998). Study of the anti-hyperglycemic effect of plants used as antidiabetics. Journal of ethnopharmacology, 61(2), 101-110. doi:10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00020-8
  2. Ballabio, C., Uberti, F., Manferdelli, S., Vacca, E., Boggini, G., Redaelli, R., Catassi, C., Lionetti, E., Peñas, E., & Restani, P. (2011). Molecular characterisation of 36 oat varieties and in vitro assessment of their suitability for coeliacs’ diet. Journal of Cereal Science, 54(1), 110-115. doi:10.1016/J.JCS.2011.04.004 Białek, M., Rutkowska, J., Adamska, A., & Bajdalow, E. (2015). Partial replacement of wheat flour with pumpkin seed flour in muffins offered to children. CyTA-Journal of Food, 14(3), 391-398 doi:10.1080/19476337.2015.1114529 Cowan, A.E., Higgins, K.A., Fisher, J.O., Tripicchio, G.L., Mattes, R.D., Zou, P., & Bailey, R.L. (2020). Examination of different definitions of snacking frequency and associations with weight status among U.S. adults. PloS one, 3(7), e2689. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0234355 Craig, W.J. (2009). Health effects of vegan diets. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 89(5), 1627S-1633S. doi:10.3945/AJCN.2009.26736N Forster, M., Rodríguez Rodríguez, E., Darias Martín, J., & Díaz Romero, C. (2003). Distribution of Nutrients in Edible Banana Pulp. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 41(2), 167-171
  3. Jiang, B., Tsao, R., Li, Y., & Miao, M. (2014). Food Safety: Food Analysis Technologies/Techniques. Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems, (2nd edn.) Academic Press, pp 273–288 doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-52512-3.00052-8
  4. Kaur, S., Panghal, A., Garg, M.K., Mann, S., Khatkar, S.K., Sharma, P., & Chhikara, N. (2020). Functional and nutraceutical properties of pumpkin – a review. Nutrition & Food Science. 50, 384–401. doi:10.1108/NFS-05-2019-0143
  5. Lim, Y. Y., Lim, T. T., & Tee, J. J. (2007). Antioxidant properties of several tropical fruits: A comparative study. Food chemistry, 103(3), 1003-1008. doi:10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2006.08.038 Molberg, Ø., Uhlen, A.K., Jensen, T., Flæte, N.S., Fleckenstein, B., Arentz-Hansen, H., Raki, M., Lundin, K.E.A., & Sollid, L.M., (2005). Mapping of gluten T-cell epitopes in the bread wheat ancestors: Implications for celiac disease. Gastroenterology, 128(2), 393-401. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2004.11.003
  6. Morris, M.A., Hutchinson, J., Gianfrancesco, C., Alwan, N.A., Carter, M.C., Scott, E.M., & Cade, J.E. (2019