KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

Using Rasch analysis to examine raters’ expertise Turkish teacher candidates’ competency levels in writing different types of test items

Ayfer SAYIN
Mehmet ŞATA
Sayfa
998–1012
Yayın Tarihi
2022-12-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Finally, it was found that the rater who was an expert in both Turkish education and measurement and evaluation had the highest level of scoring reliability, while the rater who solely had expertise in measurement and evaluation had the relatively lowest level of scoring reliability.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of the present study was to examine Turkish teacher candidates’ competency levels in writing different types of test items by utilizing Rasch analysis.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In addition, the effect of the expertise of the raters scoring the items written by the teacher candidates was examined within the scope of the study. 84 Turkish teacher candidates participated in the present study, which was conducted using the relational survey model, one of the quantitative research methods.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Finally, it was found that the rater who was an expert in both Turkish education and measurement and evaluation had the highest level of scoring reliability, while the rater who solely had expertise in measurement and evaluation had the relatively lowest level of scoring reliability.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Test item · Raters’ expertise · Many Facet Rasch

Özet

The aim of the present study was to examine Turkish teacher candidates’ competency levels in writing different types of test items by utilizing Rasch analysis. In addition, the effect of the expertise of the raters scoring the items written by the teacher candidates was examined within the scope of the study. 84 Turkish teacher candidates participated in the present study, which was conducted using the relational survey model, one of the quantitative research methods. Three experts participated in the rating process: an expert in Turkish education, an expert in measurement and evaluation, and an expert in both Turkish education and measurement and evaluation. The teacher candidates wrote true-false, short response, multiple choice and open-ended types of items in accordance with the Test Item Development Form, and the raters scored each item type by designating a score between 1 and 5 based on the item evaluation scoring rubric prepared for each item type. The study revealed that Turkish teacher candidates had the highest level of competency in writing true-false items, while they had the lowest competency in writing multiple-choice items. Moreover, it was revealed that raters’ expertise had an effect on teacher candidates’ competencies in writing different types of items. Finally, it was found that the rater who was an expert in both Turkish education and measurement and evaluation had the highest level of scoring reliability, while the rater who solely had expertise in measurement and evaluation had the relatively lowest level of scoring reliability.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine Turkish teacher candidates’ competency levels in writing different types of test items by utilizing Rasch analysis. In addition, the effect of the expertise of the raters scoring the items written by the teacher candidates was examined within the scope of the study. 84 Turkish teacher candidates participated in the present study, which was conducted using the relational survey model, one of the quantitative research methods. Three experts participated in the rating process: an expert in Turkish education, an expert in measurement and evaluation, and an expert in both Turkish education and measurement and evaluation. The teacher candidates wrote true-false, short response, multiple choice and open-ended types of items in accordance with the Test Item Development Form, and the raters scored each item type by designating a score between 1 and 5 based on the item evaluation scoring rubric prepared for each item type. The study revealed that Turkish teacher candidates had the highest level of competency in writing true-false items, while they had the lowest competency in writing multiple-choice items. Moreover, it was revealed that raters’ expertise had an effect on teacher candidates’ competencies in writing different types of items. Finally, it was found that the rater who was an expert in both Turkish education and measurement and evaluation had the highest level of scoring reliability, while the rater who solely had expertise in measurement and evaluation had the relatively lowest level of scoring reliability.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SAYIN, A., ŞATA, M. (2022). Using Rasch analysis to examine raters’ expertise Turkish teacher candidates’ competency levels in writing different types of test items. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 998–1012. https://ajindex.com/articles/866158

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Anthony, C.J., Styck, K.M., Volpe, R.J., & Robert, C.R. (2022). Using many-facet rasch measurement and generalizability theory to explore rater effects for direct behavior rating–multi-item scales. School Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000518
  2. Asim, A.E., Ekuri, E.E., & Eni, E.I. (2013). A Diagnostic Study of Pre-Service Teachers’ Competency in Multiple-Choice Item Development. Research in Education, 89(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.89.1.2
  3. Atılgan, H., & Tezbaşaran, A. (2005). Genellenebilirlik kuramı alternatif karar çalışmaları ile senaryolar ve gerçek durumlar için elde edilen g ve phi katsayılarının tutarlılığının incelenmesi. Eğitim Araştırmaları, 18(1), 28-40.
  4. Barkaoui, K. (2010). Do ESL essay raters’ evaluation criteria change with experience? A mixed-methods, cross-sectional study. TESOL Quarterly, 44(1), 31–57.
  5. Baykul, Y. (2000). Eğitimde ve psikolojide ölçme. ÖSYM Yayınları.
  6. Bıkmaz Bilgen, Ö., & Doğan, N. (2017). Puanlayıcılar Arası Güvenirlik Belirleme Tekniklerinin Karşılaştırılması. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 8(1), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.294847
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2018). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi. https://doi.org/10.14527/9789944919289
  8. Crocker, L.M. & Algina, L. (2008). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Davis, L. (2016). The influence of training and experience on rater performance in scoring spoken language. Language Testing, 33(1), 117–135.
  9. Erguvan, I.D. & Aksu Dünya, B. (2021). Gathering evidence on e-rubrics: Perspectives and many facet Rasch analysis of rating behavior. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(2), 454-474. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.818151
  10. Erman Aslanoğlu, A., & Şata, M. (2021). Examining the differential rater functioning in the process of assessing writing skills of middle school 7th grade students. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 8(4), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.88.8.4
  11. Farrokhi, F., Esfandiari, R., & Schaefer, E. (2012). A many-facet Rasch measurement of differential rater severity/leniency in three types of assessment. JALT Journal, 34(1), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ34.1-3
  12. Farrokhi, F., Esfandiari, R., & Vaez Dalili, M. (2011). Applying the many-facet Rasch model to detect centrality in self-assessment, peer-assessment and teacher assessment. W