Dergiler / Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

EFFECT OF AZIMUTH ANGLE ON THE PERFORMANCE OF A SMALL-SCALE ON-GRID PV SYSTEM

Sayfa
42–49
Yayın Tarihi
2022-12-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Finally, the highest performance ratio is obtained from the azimuth angle of 0°, as 0.857.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Abstract: In this study, the effective solar irradiation on the PV surface, electricity generation, and performance ratios of a small-scale system were investigated for a 100 kW on-grid PV system in Konya, Turkey, by PVsyst software.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Five different azimuth angles as -30°, -15°, 0°, 15°, and 30° were investigated for no-shading simulations with a fixed optimum tilt angle of 33°.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Finally, the highest performance ratio is obtained from the azimuth angle of 0°, as 0.857.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:azimuth angle · performance ratio · PV performance

Abstract

Abstract: In this study, the effective solar irradiation on the PV surface, electricity generation, and performance ratios of a small-scale system were investigated for a 100 kW on-grid PV system in Konya, Turkey, by PVsyst software. Five different azimuth angles as -30°, -15°, 0°, 15°, and 30° were investigated for no-shading simulations with a fixed optimum tilt angle of 33°. As a result, the highest effective solar radiation comes to the system with an azimuth of 0° as 1966.4 kWh/m², which is 2.12%, 0.46%, 0.79%, and 2.66% greater than the other azimuth angles of -30°, -15°, 15° and 30°, respectively. On the other hand, it is seen that the highest energy production is obtained from the system with an azimuth angle of 0° with annual energy of 174.33 MWh. This value is 1.91%, 0.37%, 0.89%, and 2.8% greater than the other azimuth angles of -30°, -15°, 15°, and 30°, respectively. In addition, to evaluate the shading effect on the performance of the PV panels, two different panel spacings as, 4 m and 8 m, were also considered. It was seen that the electricity generation with an 8 m span system was 8.88% better than the 4m. Another finding is that the height of the panels is negligible according to electricity generation. Finally, the highest performance ratio is obtained from the azimuth angle of 0°, as 0.857.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKSOY, M. H., ÇİYLEZ, İ., İSPİR, M. (2022). EFFECT OF AZIMUTH ANGLE ON THE PERFORMANCE OF A SMALL-SCALE ON-GRID PV SYSTEM. Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 42–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/865232

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Tudor C, Sova R., EU Net-Zero Policy Achievement Assessment in selected members through Automated Forecasting Algorithms. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2022;11:232-261
  2. Gross R, Leach M, Bauen A., Progress in renewable energy. Environment International. Pergamon. 2022;29:105-102
  3. Kose F, Aksoy MH, Ozgoren M. Experimental investigation of solar/wind hybrid system for irrigation in Konya, Turkey. Thermal Science. 2019;23: 4129–4139
  4. Bull SR. Renewable energy today and Tomorrow. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2001;89: 1216–1226
  5. Bagher AM, Valid MMA, Mohsen M. Types of solar cells and application. American Journal of Optics and Photonics. 2015;3(5):94-113
  6. Powell DM, Winkler MT, Choi HJ, Simmons CB, Needleman DB, Buonassisi T. Crystalline silicon photovoltaics: A cost analysis framework for determining technology pathways to reach baseload electricity costs. Energy & Environmental Science. 2012;5(3):5874-5883
  7. Tyagi VV, Rahim NAA, Rahim NA, Selvaraj JAL., Progress in solar PV technology: Research and achievement. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2013;20:443–461
  8. Nogueira CE, Bedin J, Niedzialkoski RK, De Souza SN, Das Neves JC., Performance of monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels in a water pumping system in Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015;51:1610–1616
  9. Karaağac MO, Oğul H, Bulut F. Evaluation of Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Photovoltaic Panels in Sinop Province Conditions. Turkish Journal of Nature and Science. 2021;10:176-181
  10. Green MA., Silicon Photovoltaic Modules: A brief history of the first 50 years. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications. 2005;13:447–455
  11. IRENA, Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2018 [Internet], International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, 2019 [cited 2022 September 20]. Available from:
  12. Jäger-Waldau A. Snapshot of photovoltaics − February 2018. EPJ Photovoltaics. 2018;9:6–11
  13. Benda V, Černá L. PV cells and modules – state of the art, limits and Trends. 2020;6(12): e0566
  14. Kaya MN, Aksoy MH, Köse F. Renewable Energy in Turkey: Potential, Current Status and Future Aspects. Annals of Faculty Engineering Hunedoara – International Journal of Engineering Tome. 2017;15:65–69
  15. Babayigit O, Aksoy MH, Ozgoren M, Solmaz O. Investigation of absorption cooling application powered by solar energy in the South Coast reg