Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 5

A Numerical Investigation on the Limitations of Design Equations for Steel Plate Shear Walls

Sayfa
12677–12708
Yayın Tarihi
2022-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study provides a comprehensive look on the behavior of SPWS for determining the most suitable combination of various parameters in the design of SPSW structures.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In previous studies various design issues on steel plate shear wall (SPSW) systems under lateral loading were investigated using analytical and experimental methods.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A parametric study is conducted on finite element models of 292 3-story SPSWs with rigid beam-to-column connections and designed for specified parameters.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study provides a comprehensive look on the behavior of SPWS for determining the most suitable combination of various parameters in the design of SPSW structures.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Steel plate shear wall · finite element analysis · failure

Özet

In previous studies various design issues on steel plate shear wall (SPSW) systems under lateral loading were investigated using analytical and experimental methods. However, these studies tried to examine the interactive effect of only a few of design parameters, such as panel aspect ratio, column flexibility parameter, axial load ratio on the boundary frame columns, web plate thickness, stiffness of horizontal and vertical boundary elements and top anchor beam, etc., on the drift capacity and shear force distribution among frame and panel components of SPSWs at a time. This study investigates the effect of all of these parameters in the same framework. A parametric study is conducted on finite element models of 292 3-story SPSWs with rigid beam-to-column connections and designed for specified parameters. By evaluating failure forms from finite element analyses, the limiting (undesired) cases resulting from different combinations of specified geometric properties are identified. A column flexibility factor of 2.2 is proposed instead of the current limit value of 2.5 for satisfactory column performance, improved drift capacity and balanced strength distribution among frame and panel of SPSW. The value of 0.75 for the ratio of plate shear force to total shear force has emerged as a critical threshold value for the strength distribution among plate and frame components in order to conform capacity design principles. This study provides a comprehensive look on the behavior of SPWS for determining the most suitable combination of various parameters in the design of SPSW structures.

Abstract

In previous studies various design issues on steel plate shear wall (SPSW) systems under lateral loading were investigated using analytical and experimental methods. However, these studies tried to examine the interactive effect of only a few of design parameters, such as panel aspect ratio, column flexibility parameter, axial load ratio on the boundary frame columns, web plate thickness, stiffness of horizontal and vertical boundary elements and top anchor beam, etc., on the drift capacity and shear force distribution among frame and panel components of SPSWs at a time. This study investigates the effect of all of these parameters in the same framework. A parametric study is conducted on finite element models of 292 3-story SPSWs with rigid beam-to-column connections and designed for specified parameters. By evaluating failure forms from finite element analyses, the limiting (undesired) cases resulting from different combinations of specified geometric properties are identified. A column flexibility factor of 2.2 is proposed instead of the current limit value of 2.5 for satisfactory column performance, improved drift capacity and balanced strength distribution among frame and panel of SPSW. The value of 0.75 for the ratio of plate shear force to total shear force has emerged as a critical threshold value for the strength distribution among plate and frame components in order to conform capacity design principles. This study provides a comprehensive look on the behavior of SPWS for determining the most suitable combination of various parameters in the design of SPSW structures.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜRBÜZ, M., KAZAZ, İ. (2022). A Numerical Investigation on the Limitations of Design Equations for Steel Plate Shear Walls. Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 5, 12677–12708. https://ajindex.com/articles/864105

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Dusak S, Yalçin C, Yelgin AN. Experimental investigation of using sandwich panels as infill plate in a steel plate shear wall. Teknik Dergi/Technical Journal of Turkish Chamber of Civil Engineers 2020;31:10413–39. https://doi.org/10.18400/TEKDERG.559036.
  2. Li CH, Tsai KC. Experimental responses of four 2-story narrow steel plate shear walls. Proceedings of 2008 Structural Congress, vol. 314, Vancouver, Canada, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1061/41016(314)101.
  3. Thorburn LJ, Montgomery CJ, Kulak GL. Analysis of steel plate shear walls. Edmonton, Canada, 1983.
  4. Timler PA, Kulak GL. Experimental Study of Steel Plate Shear Walls, 1983. https://doi.org/10.7939/R3C24QV49. AISC. Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. ANSI/AISC 341 2016;16. Sabelli R, Bruneau M. Steel Plate Shear Walls (Steel Design Guide 20). American Institute of Steel Construction Inc, 2006.
  5. Berman J, Bruneau M. Plastic analysis and design of steel plate shear walls. Journal of Structural Engineering 129:1448–56, 2003. Wagner H. Flat sheet metal girder with very thin metal web: Part 1: General theories and assumptions. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1931.
  6. Kuhn P, Peterson JP, Levin LR. A summary of diagonal tension Part I: methods of analysis, 1952.
  7. Montgomery CJ, Medhekar M, Lubell AS, Prion HGL, Ventura CE, Rezai M. Unstiffened steel plate shear wall performance under cyclic loading. Journal of Structural Engineering 127:973–5, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:8(973). CAN CSA. CSA-S16-09 limit states design of steel structures. Rexdale, Canadian Standard Association, 2009. AISC. Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. Chicago, Illinois, 2005.
  8. Purba R, Bruneau M. Seismic performance of steel plate shear walls considering two different design philosophies of infill plates. II: Assessment of collapse potential (2014 b). Journal of Structural Engineering (United States) 141:1–12, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001097. Berman JW. Seismic behavior of code designed steel plate shear walls. Engineering Structures 33:230–44, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.10.015.
  9. Verma A, Sahoo DR. Estimation of lateral force contribution of boundary elements in steel plate shear wall systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 46:1081–98, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2845.
  10. Hosseinzadeh SAA, Tehranizadeh M. Behavioral characteristics of code designed steel plate shear wall systems. Journal of Constructional Steel Resea