KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Sayı: 48

Pakistan ve Türkiye’deki Çingenelerin İstihdam Olanakları ve Sağlık Hizmetlerine Erişimi Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz

A Comparative Analysis of Gypsies’ Access to Employment Opportunities and Health Services in Pakistan and Turkey

Reşat Açıkgöz(SELCUK UNIVERSITY)
Muhammad Suliman(SELCUK UNIVERSITY)
Sayfa
277–294
Yayın Tarihi
2022-12-25
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Çalışmanın bulgularına göre hem Pakistan hem de Türkiye’de Çingeneler, çoğu durumda istihdam fırsatlarının dışında kalmakta ve enformel sektördeki işlerde çalışmaya itilmektedirler.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Çingeneler hem Pakistan hem de Türkiye’de önemli bir etnik gruptur; barınma, çalışma, sağlık ve eğitim gibi alanlarda toplumun diğer kesimlerine göre daha dezavantajlı bir konumda bulunurlar.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Görüşmeler, erkek ve kadın katılımcılardan toplam 14 kişi (Pakistan ve Türkiye’de 7’şer kişi) üzerinden gerçekleştirilmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Çalışmanın bulgularına göre hem Pakistan hem de Türkiye’de Çingeneler, çoğu durumda istihdam fırsatlarının dışında kalmakta ve enformel sektördeki işlerde çalışmaya itilmektedirler.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Çingeneler · istihdam · sağlık

Özet

Çingeneler hem Pakistan hem de Türkiye’de önemli bir etnik gruptur; barınma, çalışma, sağlık ve eğitim gibi alanlarda toplumun diğer kesimlerine göre daha dezavantajlı bir konumda bulunurlar. Bu çalışmada, Pakistan ve Türkiye’de yaşayan Çingenelerin istihdam olanakları ve sağlık hizmetlerine erişimleri incelenmektedir. Araştırmacılar, istihdam ve sağlık hizmetleri alanlarıyla sınırlı kalmak kaydıyla her iki ülkedeki Çingenelerin durumunu istihdam ve sağlık hizmetlerine erişim fırsatları bağlamında karşılaştırmayı amaçlamaktadırlar. Çalışmada, araştırma yöntemi olarak nitel araştırma, araştırma tekniği olarak da derinlemesine görüşme tekniği kullanılmıştır. Görüşmeler, erkek ve kadın katılımcılardan toplam 14 kişi (Pakistan ve Türkiye’de 7’şer kişi) üzerinden gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmanın bulgularına göre hem Pakistan hem de Türkiye’de Çingeneler, çoğu durumda istihdam fırsatlarının dışında kalmakta ve enformel sektördeki işlerde çalışmaya itilmektedirler. Barınma koşulları ve hareketli yaşam biçimlerinden dolayı sağlık hizmetlerine erişimleri de oldukça sınırlıdır. Ancak hem istihdam olanakları hem de sağlık hizmetlerine erişimle ilgili olarak Türkiye’deki Çingenelerin Pakistan’daki Çingenelere oranla daha avantajlı bir konumda oldukları görülmüştür.

Abstract

Gypsies are an important ethnic group both in Pakistan and Turkey. They are in a more disadvantaged position as compared to other segments of society in areas such as housing, work, health, and education. In this study, employment opportunities and access to health services of gypsies living in Pakistan and Turkey are explored. The researchers delimited the study only to areas of employment and health sectors in both countries, with the aim to comparatively analyze the situation of Gypsies’ access to these services. In the study, qualitative research design and in-depth interview technique were used to collect data from respondents. The interviews were conducted with a total of 14 people (7 participants from Pakistan and 7 from Turkey respectively) including both male and female. According to the findings of the study, Gypsies both in Pakistan and Turkey are mostly excluded from employment opportunities and are pushed to work in informal sectors. Their access to health services is also very limited due to their housing conditions and active lifestyle. However, it has been observed that the conditions of Gypsies in Turkey were found better than the Pakistani ones in terms of employment opportunities and access to health services.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Açıkgöz, R., Suliman, M. (2022). Pakistan ve Türkiye’deki Çingenelerin İstihdam Olanakları ve Sağlık Hizmetlerine Erişimi Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz. Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 48, 277–294. https://doi.org/10.21497/sefad.1218484

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (103)

  1. Akkan, B. E., Deniz, M. B., & Ertan, M. (2011). Sosyal dışlanmanın roman halleri. Istanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Sosyal Politika Formu.
  2. Akkan, B., Deniz, M. B., & Ertan, M. (2017). The Romanization of poverty: Spatial stigmatization of Roma neighborhoods in Turkey. Romani Studies, 27(1), 73-94. https://doi.org/10.3828/rs.2017.4
  3. Akkaya, Ö., & Yılgür, E. (2019). Locally Confined Territorial Stigmatization. The Case of “Gypsy” Stigma. Idealkent, 10(26), 214-25.
  4. Ali, L., & Taieb, M. (2021). Patterns and cultural traditions of marriage among Khanabadosh of Mardan. The Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Peshawar, 29(2), 16-30.
  5. Arayıcı, A. (2008). Gypsies: the forgotten people of Turkey. International Social Science Journal, 59(193), 527-538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.2009.01683.x
  6. Avci, I. A., Cavusoglu, F., Aydin, M., & Altay, B. (2018). Attitude and practice of family planning methods among Roma women living in northern Turkey. International journal of nursing sciences, 5(1), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.01.002
  7. Ayub, A., Khan, R. S., Khan, S. A., Hussain, H., Tabassum, A., Shehzad, J. A., & Shah, S. S. (2018). Progress of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Pakistan) towards universal health coverage. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad: JAMC, 30(3), 482-485. https://jamc.ayubmed.edu.pk/jamc/index.php/jamc/issue/view/97
  8. Bancroft, A. (2017). Roma and Gypsy-Travellers in Europe: Modernity, Race, Space and Exclusion. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/csqh8
  9. Bartosovic I. (2016). Some aspects of health status of the Gypsy population in Slovakia. Bratislavske lekarske listy, 117(1), 26–30. https://doi:10.4149/BLL_2016_006
  10. Berland, J. C. (1983). Peripatetic strategies in South Asia: Skills as capital among nomadic artisans and entertainers (13). (Commission on Nomadic Peoples, Issue. Nomadic Peoples.
  11. Berland, J. C. (1986). Pārytān:" Native" Models of Peripatetic Strategies in Pakistan (21/22). Commission on Nomadic Peoples.
  12. Berland, J. C. (2021). Territorial activities among peripatetic peoples in Pakistan. In Mobility and Territoriality.Routledge.https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003135135-18/territorial-activities-among-peripatetic-peoples-pakistan-joseph-berland
  13. Berland, J. C., & Berland, J. (1982). No five fingers are alike: Cognitive amplifiers in social context. Harvard University Press.
  14. Brown, P. (2010). Review: social exclusion of Gypsies and Travellers: Health impact. Journal of Research in Nursing, 15(4), 329-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987110363236
  15. Casa-Nova, M. J. (2007). Gypsies, ethnicity, and the labour market: An introduction. Romani Studies, 17(1), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.3828/rs.2007.4
  16. Cemlyn, S., & Clark, C. (2005). The social exclusion of Gypsy and traveller children. In G. Preston (Ed.), At Greatest Risk: the Children Most Likely to be Poor (pp. 150-165). Child Poverty Action Group.
  17. Cheema, A. R., Zaidi, S., Najmi, R., Khan, F. A., Kori, S. A., & Shah, N. A. (2020). Availability Does Not Mean Utilisation: Analysis of a large Micro Health Insurance Programme in Pakistan. Global Journal of Health Science, 12(10), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v12n10p14
  18. Choudhry, F. R., & Bokharey, I. Z. (2013). Perception of mental health in Pakistani nomads: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 8(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v8i0.22469
  19. Ciaian, P. (2016). Causes of the Social and Economic Marginalisation: The Role of Social Mobility Barriers for Roma (No. EERI RP 2016/03): Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/eeirpaper/eeri_5frp_5f2016_5f03.htm
  20. Ciaian, P., & Kancs, d. A. (2018). Marginalisation of Roma: Root Causes and Possible Policy Actions. European Review, 27, 115 - 130. https://doi:10.1017/S106279871800056X
  21. Condon, L., Bedford, H., Ireland, L., Kerr, S., Mytton, J., Richardson, Z., & Jackson, C. (2019). Engaging Gypsy, Roma, and Traveller communities in research: maximizing opportunities and overcoming challenges. Qualitative Health Research, 29(9), 1324-1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318813558
  22. Cook, B., Wayne, G. F., Valentine, A., Lessios, A., & Yeh, E. (2013). Revisiting the evidence on health and health care disparities among the Roma: a systematic review 2003–2012. International journal of public health, 58(6), 885-911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-013-0518-6
  23. Council of Europe (2011) Defending Roma human rights in Europe, Brussels: Council of Europe.
  24. Council of Europe (2012) Council of Europe strategy for the rights of the child (2012-2015) CM (2011)171 final, Strasbourg, Council of Europe
  25. Crang, M. (2002). Between places: producing hubs, flows, and networks. Environment and Planning, 34(4), 569-574. https://doi.org/10.1068/a34154
  26. Crowe, D. M. (1999). The Gypsies of Romania since 1990. Nationalities Papers, 27(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/009059999109181
  27. David, S., Margaret, G. (2012). Housed Gypsies and travellers in the UK: work, exclusion and adaptation. Race & Class, 53(3), 48-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396811425985
  28. Drakakis, S. A. (2007). Nomadism a moving myth? Policies of exclusion and the Gypsy/Traveller response. Mobilities, 2(3), 463-487. https://doi:10.1080/17450100701597467
  29. Durst, J. (2011). What makes us Gypsies, who knows? Ethnicity and reproduction. In M. S. a. M. ROVID (Ed.), Multi-disciplinary approaches to Romany studies (pp. 13-34). Hungary: CEU Summer University.
  30. Ekmekçi, P. E. (2016). Health and Roma people in Turkey. Balkan Medical Journal, 33(4), 377-382. https://doi:10.5152/balkanmedj.2016.151385
  31. Fırat, M., & Açıkgöz, R. (2020). Elazığ’da yaşayan çingenelerin değişen/dönüşen meslekleri üzerine nitel bir araştırma. Journal of Economy Culture and Society(Özel Sayı 1/Supplement 1), 229-248.
  32. Francis, G. (2013). Developing the cultural competence of health professionals working with Gypsy Travellers. Journal of Psychological Issues in Organizational Culture, 3(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpoc.21074
  33. Gavrielides, T., Topa, S., & Major, A. (2012). Universal human rights? Looking at multi-cultural Britain and Canada for Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Criminology Volume, 4(2), 45-62.
  34. Gazdar, H., Masood, S. Q., & Naqvi, H. (2013). Bottom Up or Top Down? Exclusion and Citizenship in Pakistan, Karachi: Collective for Social Science Research. http://www.researchcollective.org/
  35. Göncüoğlu, S. F., & Yavuztürk, Ş. P. (2009). Sulukule ve çingeneleri. Güzel Sanatlar Enstitüsü Dergisi (23), 107-134. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunigsed/issue/2579/33178
  36. Hajioff, S., & McKee, M. (2000). The health of the Roma people: a review of the published literature. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 54(11), 864-869. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.54.11.864
  37. Hancock, I. (2010). Danger! Educated Gypsy: Selected Essays. Univ of Hertfordshire Press.
  38. Hancock, I. (2010). Mind the doors! The contribution of linguistics. In All Change: Romani Studies through Romani Eyes. University of Hertfordshire Press
  39. Hancock, I. F. (1987). The pariah syndrome: An account of Gypsy slavery and persecution. Karoma Pub.
  40. Happy, S. (2021). Khanabadosh! Faqeer life in pakistan|Pakistani Gypsy|Khana Badosh Ramzan Special. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAmhb5eUys8
  41. Hussain, A. (1979) Elite politics in an ıdeological state: the case of Pakistan. Folkestone: Dowson & Sons.
  42. Hussain, R., & Arif, S. (2021). Universal health coverage and COVID-19: recent developments and implications. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, 14(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-021-00306-x
  43. İlhan, S., & Fırat, M. (2017). Bir inşa süreci olarak çingenelik: Kuramsal bir çözümleme. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 27(2), 265-276. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.346534
  44. Imre, A. (2005). Whiteness in post-socialist Eastern Europe: The time of the Gypsies, the end of race (Vol. 10): State University of New York Press Albany.
  45. Javed, K. (2017). To reveal the emotional value of Khanabadosh and spirit of huts. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 8(10), 618-622.
  46. Johnson, M. (1984). Ethnic minorities and health. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 18(4), 228-230.
  47. Kabachnik, P., & Ryder, A. (2013). Nomadism and the 2003 anti-social behaviour act: constraining Gypsy and Traveller mobilities in Britain. Romani Studies, 23(1), 83-106. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/509384.
  48. Kalsbeek, W. D., & Cross, A. (1982). Problems in sampling nomadic population. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section.
  49. Karlıdağ, Melike, & Marsh, Adrian. (2008). A study of research literature regarding Turkish Gypsies and the question of Gypsy Identity. In E. Uzpeder, S. Danova/Roussinova, S. Özçelik, & S. Gökçen (Eds.), We are Here! Discriminatory exclusion and struggle for rights of Roma in Turkey (pp. 143–156). Istanbul: Mart Matbaacılık. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=200104
  50. Kenrick, D. (2004). Gypsies: from the Ganges to the Thames (Vol. 3): Univ of Hertfordshire Press.
  51. Kenrick, D. (2007). Historical dictionary of the Gypsies (Romanies). Scarecrow Press.
  52. Khan, S. A., Ayub, A., Khan, K. A., Khan, R. S., & Jamil, A. (2018). Political Architecture and Legal Framework Related to Social Health Protection Schemes in Pakistan: Qualitative Inquiry of Policy Makers' Viewpoint. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad: JAMC, 30(3), 389-396. https://europepmc.org/article/med/30465372
  53. Kılıçoğlu, G., & Kılıçoğlu, D. Y. (2018). The Romany States of Education in Turkey: A Qualitative Study. The Urban Review, 50(3), 402-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-017-0439-4
  54. Kolukırık, S. (2009). Dünden bugüne çingeneler. Istanbul: Ozan Yayıncılık.
  55. Kolukırık, S., & Toktaş, Ş. (2007). Turkey's Roma: Political participation and organization. Middle Eastern Studies, 43(5), 761-777. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200701422675
  56. Kreutzmann, H. (2003). Ethnic minorities and marginality in the Pamirian Knot: survival of Wakhi and Kirghiz in a harsh environment and global contexts. Geographical Journal, 169(3), 215-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4959.00086
  57. Kurban, D. (2007). A quest for equality: Minorities in Turkey. UK: Minority Rights Group International London.
  58. Lasker, M. S., Dio, L. M., Chowdhury, M. H., Hossain, M. S., Islam, M. N., & Chowdhury, M. J. (2019). Lifestyle of the Nomadic River Gypsies and their threat Narrative: A Tale of two villages in Bangladesh. International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, 17(5), 154-161.
  59. Lloyd, G., & Stead, J. (2001). The boys and girls not calling me names and the teachers to believe me. Name calling and the experiences of Travellers in school. Children & Society, 15(5), 361-374. https://doi:10.1002/chi.671
  60. Lucassen, L. (1991). The power of definition. Stigmatisation, minoritisation and ethnicity illustrated by the history of gypsies in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences, 27, 80-91.
  61. Lucassen, L., Willems, W., & Cottaar, A.-M. (2015). Gypsies and other itinerant groups: A socio-historical approach: Springer.
  62. Marcu, A., & Chryssochoou, X. (2005). Exclusion of Ethnic Groups from the Realm of Humanity: Prejudice against the Gypsies in Britain and in Romania. Psicologia Politica, 30, 41-56.
  63. Marsch, A. (2008). Ethnicity and identity: who are the Gypsies? European Roma Rights Center Country Reports Series (17), 21-30.
  64. McGarry, A. (2010). Who speaks for Roma?: Political representation of a transnational minority community. The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.
  65. Mehmood, A. (2020). Education Took Her from Darkness to Light: Pakistan ‘gypsy’ woman overcomes tremendous barriers to earn three master’s degrees. The Media Line.
  66. Messing, V. (2014). Methodological puzzles of surveying Roma/Gypsy populations. Ethnicities, 14(6), 811-829. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796814542180
  67. Millan, M., & Smith, D. (2019). A Comparative Sociology of Gypsy Traveller Health in the UK. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3),1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030379
  68. Myers, M. (2014). Narratives of Gypsy Identity and the Crossing of Boundaries (PhD thesis). The Open University. https://doi.org/10.21954/ou.ro.0000eeff
  69. Myers, M., & Bhopal, K. (2009). Gypsy, Roma and Traveler Children in Schools: Understandings of comunity and safety. British Journal of Educational Studies, 57(4), 417-434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2009.00442.x
  70. Niner, P. (2004). Accommodating Nomadism? An Examination of Accommodation Options for Gypsies and Travellers in England. Housing Studies, 19(2), 141-159. https://doi:10.1080/0267303032000168568
  71. Öcek, Z. A., Çiçeklioğlu, M., Yücel, U., & Özdemir, R. (2014). Family medicine model in Turkey: a qualitative assessment from the perspectives of primary care workers. BMC family practice, 15(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-38
  72. Omar, M. A. (1992). Health care for nomads too, please. Paper presented at the World health forum 1992; 13 (4): 307-310.
  73. Önen, S. (2013). Citizenship Rights of Gypsies in Turkey: Roma and Dom Communities. Middle Eastern Studies, 49, 608-622. https://doi:10.1080/00263206.2013.798310
  74. Özateşler, G. (2014). Gypsies under Surveillance. In Gypsy Stigma and Exclusion in Turkey, 1970 (pp. 25-50): Springer.
  75. Özateşler, G. (2017). Multidimensionality of exclusionary violence: A case of anti-Gypsy violence in Turkey. Ethnicities, 17(6), 792-815. https://doi:10.1177/1468796813518206
  76. Parry, G., Van Cleemput, P., Peters, J., Walters, S., Thomas, K., & Cooper, C. (2007). Health status of Gypsies and Travellers in England. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 61(3), 198-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.045997
  77. Partington, M. (1999). Current developments. The Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 21(3), 279-284.
  78. Pearson, R. (1988). Ian Hancock, The Pariah Syndrome: An Account of Gypsy Slavery and Persecution. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers, 1987. xii, 180 pp. Nationalities Papers, 16(2), 332-334.
  79. Peters, J., Parry, G. D., Van Cleemput, P., Moore, J., Cooper, C. L., & Walters, S. J. (2009). Health and use of health services: a comparison between Gypsies and Travellers and other ethnic groups. Ethnicity & health, 14(4), 359-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557850802699130
  80. Phillips, C. (2019). The trouble with culture: A speculative account of the role of gypsy/traveller cultures in ‘doorstep fraud.’ Theoretical Criminology, 23(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480617733725
  81. Placa, V. L., & Smith, D. M. (2016). The Health and Wellbeing of Gypsies and Travellers in Settled Housing: A Narrative Review of the Evidence and Policy. International journal of social science studies, 4, 87-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v4i9.1812
  82. Rüdiger, J.c.c. (1996). On the Indic Language and Origin of the Gypsies (K.B. Manuel Priego Thimmel, & Annette Monreal, Trans.). University of Manchester.
  83. Shubin, S., & Swanson, K. (2010). “I’m an imaginary figure”: Unravelling the mobility and marginalisation of Scottish Gypsy Travellers. Geoforum, 41(6), 919-929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.06.006
  84. Siddique, A., Ahmad, S., & Chaudhary, A. H. (2017). Exploring nomadic parents’ attitudes towards education of children in district Kasur. Journal of Secondary Education and Research, 1(1), 45-55. http://pu.edu.pk/home/journal/46/contactus.html
  85. Şimsek, S., Kenan, U., & Galip, Ö. (2020). Türkiye’de romanların yaşadıkları problemlere romanlar, yerel idareciler ve yöneticiler perspektifinden bir bakış. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (50), 164-185. https://doi.org/10.48070/erusosbilder.705640
  86. Smith, D., & Ruston, A. (2013). ‘If you feel that nobody wants you, you'll withdraw into your own’: Gypsies/Travellers, networks and healthcare utilisation. Sociology of Health & Illness, 35(8), 1196-1210. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12029
  87. Soulis, G. C. (1961). The Gypsies in the Byzantine Empire and the Balkans in the Late Middle Ages. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 15, 141-165. https://doi:10.2307/1291178
  88. Spooner, B. (1984). Nomads in a Wider Society. Cultural Survival Quarterly, 8 (1), Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/anthro_papers/70
  89. Suliman, M., Shah, M., & Ullah, A. (2016b). Nomads: The Politically Marginalised Segment of Pakistani Society on the basis of Ethnic Prejudice. Journal of Exclusion Studies, 6(1), 18-29. 10.5958/2231-4555.2016.00002.4
  90. Suliman, M., Shah, M., & Ullah, I. (2017). Addressing the issue of nomadic communities’ children educational exclusion through mobile tent schools in Malakand, Pakistan. Imperial journal of interdisciplinary research (IJIR), 3(3), 540-546. http://www.onlinejournal.in
  91. Suliman, M., Shah, M., Ullah, A., & Jamal, H. (2016a). Ethnicity based Social Exclusion of Nomads in Khyber District Malakand, Pakhtunkhwa-Pakistan. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 11-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/41
  92. Syed, J. (2008). Pakistani model of diversity management: Rediscovering Jinnah's vision. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 28(3/4), 100-113. https://doi:10.1108/01443330810862179
  93. Ugur Rizzi, C. (2020). Antiziganism as a Barrier for the Roma to Access Policies: The Case of Romani Access to Education in Turkey. Ethnopolitics, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2020.1839220
  94. Uştuk, O., & Tunç Cox, A. (2020). Roma people of Turkey re-write their cinematographic images. Ethnicities, 20(3), 501-519. https://doi:10.1177/1468796819890463
  95. Van Cleemput, P. (2010). Social exclusion of Gypsies and Travellers: Health impact. Journal of Research in Nursing, 15(4), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987110363235
  96. Vašečka, M., Jurásková, M., & Nicholson, T. (2003). Čačipen pal o Roma. A global report on Roma in Slovakia. Institute for Public Affairs.
  97. Vorvolakos, T., Samakouri, M., Tripsianis, G., Tsatalmpasidou, E., Arvaniti, A., Terzoudi, A., & Livaditis, M. (2012). Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of Roma and non-Roma psychiatric outpatients in Greece. Ethnicity & health, 17(1-2), 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2012.654767
  98. Weckman, S. (1998). Researching Finnish gypsies: Advice from a gypsy. Gypsies: An Interdisciplinary Reader, New York: Garland.
  99. Yıldız, H. (2007). Türkçede Çingeneler için kullanılan kelimeler ve bunların etimolojileri. Dil Araştırmaları, 1(1), 61-82.
  100. Yılgür, E. (2015). Ethnicity, class and politicisation: Immigrant Roma tobacco workers in Turkey. Romani Studies, 25(2), 167-196.
  101. Yılgür, E. (2017). Türkiye’de peripatetik topluluklar: Jenerik terimler ve öz-etnik kategorizasyon biçimleri. Nişantaşı Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 5(1), 1- 25.
  102. Yılgür, E. (2018). Balkanlar, Anadolu ve Mezopotamya’da zanaat göçebeleri. KA Dergi, 3(8), 22-35.
  103. Zeman, C. L., Depken, D. E., & Senchina, D. S. (2003). Roma health issues: a review of the literature and discussion. Ethnicity & health, 8(3), 223-249. https://doi:10.1080/1355785032000136434