Dergiler / International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

The Attitudes of Governmental Official in Terms of Sustainable Environment

Sayfa
142–156
Yayın Tarihi
2019-06-08
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

There was no significant difference observed in the environment-related ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes in the place of residence variable.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The inhabitable environment for all living beings is the first condition of the continuity of life in the world.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The increase in population and the environmental problems it brings are forcing countries to take measures and to raise more environmentalist individuals.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:There was no significant difference observed in the environment-related ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes in the place of residence variable.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Environmental behaviour · anthropocentric and ecocentric attitudes

Abstract

The inhabitable environment for all living beings is the first condition of the continuity of life in the world. The environment is an indispensable setting for all individuals and the damage to the environment is of utmost importance to every sector. The increase in population and the environmental problems it brings are forcing countries to take measures and to raise more environmentalist individuals. In particular, environmental degradation done involuntarily and wastes resulting from excessive consumption pose a big problem. Although the environment is a setting where all creatures live together, the greatest impact is made by human beings. Studies on environmental issues often focus on educational environments including educators and students. However, all positive or negative environmental activities are followed carefully by the whole society. It is known that individuals' attitudes towards the environment are generally either human-centred (Anthropocentric) or environment-centred (Ecocentric), or totally anti-environmental. This study was applied to 300 personnel working in different branches of the public sector in order to determine which of these three attitudes they are more inclined to, and what demographic characteristics affect them. The applied questionnaire is a 7-scale Likert type with 27 articles consisting of 12 articles that measure environmental-centred attitudes, 8 articles that measure human-centred attitudes, and 7 articles that measure antipathetic attitudes towards the environment. In addition, more detailed information about the individuals was obtained by applying another questionnaire with demographic features. It has been determined that ecocentric attitudes in governmental officials’ behaviours towards the environment is higher. In antipathetic attitudes towards the environment, on the other hand, the situation is in favour of males. There was no significant difference observed in the environment-related ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes in the place of residence variable.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YURTTAŞ, A., ÇAĞLAR, A. (2019). The Attitudes of Governmental Official in Terms of Sustainable Environment. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 142–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/861361

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Akçay, S. & Pekel, O. (2017). Öğretmen Adaylarının Çevre Bilinci ve Çevresel Duyarlılıklarının Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 16(3), 1174-1184.
  2. Akgül, M. B., Birinci, C., Göral, Ş. & Küçükkaya, S.(2017). An investigation of ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes and antipathy towards environment in athletes. International Journal of Human Sciences, 14(4), 3405-3414.
  3. Arık, A., Yılmaz M. (2017). Fen Bilimleri Öğretmen Adaylarının Çevre Sorunlarına Yönelik Tutumları ve Çevre Kirliliğine Yönelik Metaforik Algıları. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 25(3),1147-1164.
  4. Atlı, K., Uzun, N., Saraç, C., Sağlam, N. & Sağlam, S. (2015).
  5. Öğrencilerin Ekosentrik, Antroposentrik ve Çevreye Yönelik Antipatik Tutumlarının Akademik Başarıları İle İlişkisi. International Journal of Innovative Research in Education, 2(1), 39-47.
  6. Bovenberg, Lans & Sjak Smulders; (1995), “Environmental Quality Pollution-Augmenting Technological Change in a Two Sector Endogenous Growth Model”. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 369-391.
  7. Casey, P.J., & Scott K. (2006). Environmental concern and behaviour in an Australian sample within an ecocentrik – antropocentric framework. Australian Journal of Psychology, 58(2), 57 – 67. Çevre Kanunu. (1983). http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr (Erişim Tarihi: 26.05.2018)
  8. Demircioğlu, G., Demircioğlu, H. & Yadigaroğlu, M. (2015).
  9. Fizik, Kimya Ve Biyoloji Öğretmen Adaylarının Çevre Bilinç Düzeylerinin Değerlendirilmesi. AdıyamanÜniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2015(19), 167-193.
  10. Derman, İ. & Senemoğlu, N. (2015). Ortaöğretim 9 ve 12. Sınıf Öğrencilerini Sürdürülebilir Çevre Bilinci Düzeyleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 48(2), 61-82.
  11. Diken, E. H., Sert, Çıbık, A. (2009). İlköğretim Bölümü Öğretmen Adaylarının Çevre Bilincinin Cinsiyete Göre Değişiminin İncelenmesi. Bayburt Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 4(1), 14-25.
  12. Drabo, A. (2010).
  13. Interrelationships between Health, Environment Quality and Economic Activity: What Consequences for Economic Convergence, pp. 1-34, Internet Address: https://halshs.archivesouvertes.fr/halshs-00552995, Date of Access: 12.05.2015. Drager R. M. & Chandler E. W. (1993). Antropocentric Construct Validity And Measurement. Journal Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 169-188.
  14. Ecevit, E., & Çetin, M. (2016). Ekonomik Büyüme ve Çevre Kirliliğinin Sağlik Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye İle İlgili Ampirik Kanit. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2016 (48)