Dergiler / Journal of Computer and Education Research / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 20

Thematic and Methodological Trends of Graduate Thesis in Comparative Education: A Content Analysis

Sayfa
777–794
Yayın Tarihi
2022-12-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In the theses examined, it was concluded that higher education and teacher education were the most frequently compared topics.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, it is aimed to examine the graduate theses made between 2016-2021 in Turkey in the field of comparative education.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Within the scope of the study, 133 graduate theses registered in the database of Higher Education Institution National Thesis Center were analyzed by using content analysis technique in line with research problems.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In the theses examined, it was concluded that higher education and teacher education were the most frequently compared topics.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016-2021 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Comparative education · content analysis · methodological tendency

Özet

In this study, it is aimed to examine the graduate theses made between 2016-2021 in Turkey in the field of comparative education. The data used in the study, which was carried out according to the qualitative research design, were reached through document analysis. Within the scope of the study, 133 graduate theses registered in the database of Higher Education Institution National Thesis Center were analyzed by using content analysis technique in line with research problems. As a result of the findings, it was determined that the most thesis in the field of comparative education was made in 2018; It was determined that Hacettepe University and Gazi University were the universities with the highest number of graduate studies. It was determined that the majority of theses were made in the department of educational sciences. It was determined that the qualitative design was widely preferred in the theses examined and the document analysis technique was mostly used in the data collection process. It was concluded that the sample/comparison criteria and comparison approach were not specified in the majority of theses. It was also concluded that while Germany, England, Finland and the USA were the countries with which the most comparisons were made, the majority of theses were made for secondary and undergraduate education levels. In the theses examined, it was concluded that higher education and teacher education were the most frequently compared topics.

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to examine the graduate theses made between 2016-2021 in Turkey in the field of comparative education. The data used in the study, which was carried out according to the qualitative research design, were reached through document analysis. Within the scope of the study, 133 graduate theses registered in the database of Higher Education Institution National Thesis Center were analyzed by using content analysis technique in line with research problems. As a result of the findings, it was determined that the most thesis in the field of comparative education was made in 2018; It was determined that Hacettepe University and Gazi University were the universities with the highest number of graduate studies. It was determined that the majority of theses were made in the department of educational sciences. It was determined that the qualitative design was widely preferred in the theses examined and the document analysis technique was mostly used in the data collection process. It was concluded that the sample/comparison criteria and comparison approach were not specified in the majority of theses. It was also concluded that while Germany, England, Finland and the USA were the countries with which the most comparisons were made, the majority of theses were made for secondary and undergraduate education levels. In the theses examined, it was concluded that higher education and teacher education were the most frequently compared topics.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YÜKSEL, D. K., BAKA, B. (2022). Thematic and Methodological Trends of Graduate Thesis in Comparative Education: A Content Analysis. Journal of Computer and Education Research, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 20, 777–794. https://ajindex.com/articles/860504

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Arnove, R. F. (2003). Introduction: Reframing comparative education. In R.F Arnove, C. Alberto, & A. Torres (Eds.) Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local (pp. 1-24). London: Rowmani Littlefielf Publishers.
  2. Arslan, A. & Çalmaşur, H. (2017). İlkokul ve ortaokul öğretmenlerinin çokkültürlü eğitim tutumları ve demokratik tutumlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Analysis of multiculturalism and democratic attitude of elementary and secondary grade teach]. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34, 90-109.
  3. Aydemir, S., & Erdamar, G. (2018). Medya okuryazarlığı eğitimi alanında yapılan çalışmaların tematik, metodolojik ve istatistiksel yönelimleri [Thematic, methodological and statistical tendencies of studies in the field of media literacy education]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(4), 1155-1166. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.409585
  4. Bakioğlu, A., Keser, S., Doğan, B. & Çayak, S. (2017). Küreselleşme bağlamında eğitimde karşılaştırma, amaç ve metot [Comparison, purpose and method in education in the context of globalization]. In A. Bakioğlu (Eds.) Karşılaştırmalı eğitim politikalar göstergeler, bağlamlar [Comparative education policies indicators, contexts] (pp. 12-43). Konya: Eğitim Publishing. Bray, M. (2007). Actors and purposes in comparative education. In M. Bray, B. Admasson & M. Mason. (Eds). Comparative education research approaches and methods (pp. 15-32). Centre The University of Hongkong: Springer. Broadfoot, P. (2000). Comparative education for the twenty-first century: retrospect and prospect. Comparative Education, 36(3), 357-72.
  5. Crossley, M. & Watson, K. (2003). Comparative and international research in education, Routledge Falmer: New York. Çubukçu, Z., Yılmaz, B. Y. & İnci, T. (2016). Karşılaştırmalı eğitim programları araştırma eğilimlerinin belirlenmesi bir içerik analizi [Determination of comparative curriculum research trends -a content analysis]. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 5(1), 446-468.
  6. Demir, G. T. (2017). 1918-1938 yılları arasında yayınlanan eğitim dergilerindeki karşılaştırmalı eğitim makaleleri [The comparative education articles at the journal of education published between the 1918-1938 years]. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 6(1), 15-33.
  7. Demirel, Ö. (2000). Karşılaştırmalı eğitim [Co