KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Computer and Education Research / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 20

Students' Experiences and Usability Evaluation in Interactive Digital Interface Development Process

Tansel TEPE
Sayfa
434–451
Yayın Tarihi
2022-12-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to findings, most of the mobile application and website interfaces designed by students were evaluated as good usable, and a certain part as excellent usable.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this research, it was aimed to determine student experiences in the design process of interactive digital interfaces developed with Figma and to evaluate students’ works developed within the scope of the “Digital Interface Design” course by students and lecturer.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:While determining the participant group of the study conducted with 57 students, convenient sampling method, which is one of the non-random sampling types was used.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to findings, most of the mobile application and website interfaces designed by students were evaluated as good usable, and a certain part as excellent usable.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Interface design · usability · user experience

Özet

In this research, it was aimed to determine student experiences in the design process of interactive digital interfaces developed with Figma and to evaluate students’ works developed within the scope of the “Digital Interface Design” course by students and lecturer. The case study design was used in the research. While determining the participant group of the study conducted with 57 students, convenient sampling method, which is one of the non-random sampling types was used. Implementation activities lasted eight weeks. At the end of the implementation process, each of the student was expected to develop interactive mobile application or website interfaces. The qualitative data of the study were analyzed by content analysis method, while the quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. According to findings, most of the mobile application and website interfaces designed by students were evaluated as good usable, and a certain part as excellent usable.

Abstract

In this research, it was aimed to determine student experiences in the design process of interactive digital interfaces developed with Figma and to evaluate students’ works developed within the scope of the “Digital Interface Design” course by students and lecturer. The case study design was used in the research. While determining the participant group of the study conducted with 57 students, convenient sampling method, which is one of the non-random sampling types was used. Implementation activities lasted eight weeks. At the end of the implementation process, each of the student was expected to develop interactive mobile application or website interfaces. The qualitative data of the study were analyzed by content analysis method, while the quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. According to findings, most of the mobile application and website interfaces designed by students were evaluated as good usable, and a certain part as excellent usable.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TEPE, T. (2022). Students' Experiences and Usability Evaluation in Interactive Digital Interface Development Process. Journal of Computer and Education Research, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 20, 434–451. https://ajindex.com/articles/860488

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Albert, B., & Tullis, T. (2013). Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Newnes. Butow, E. (2007). User interface design for mere mortals. Pearson Education. Çağıltay, K. (2011). İnsan bilgisayar etkileşimi ve kullanılabilirlik mühendisliği: Teoriden pratiğe (Human computer interaction and usability engineering: From theory to practice). Ankara:
  2. ODTÜ Yayıncılık. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. D., & Beale, R. (2004). Human-computer interaction. 3rd. Edition. Harlow: Pearson, Prentice Hall. Erdinç, O., & Lewis J. R. (2013). Psychometric evaluation of the T-CSUQ: The Turkish version of the computer system usability questionnaire. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29 (5), 319-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2012.711702
  3. Galitz, W. O. (2007). The essential guide to user interface design: an introduction to GUI design principles and techniques. John Wiley & Sons. Georgiev, T., & Georgieva, E. (2009). User Interface design for mobile learning applications. e. Learning, 9, 145-150.
  4. Ghaoui, C. (2005). Encyclopedia of human computer interaction. IGI Global. Goldberg, J. H., & Wichansky, A. M. (2003). Eye tracking in usability evaluation: A practitioner's guide. In the Mind's Eye (pp. 493-516).
  5. North-Holland. Head, V. (2016). Designing interface animation: Improving the user experience through animation. Brooklyn, NY: Rosenfeld Media. Kraleva, R. S. (2017). Designing an interface for a mobile application based on children’s opinion. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 11(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v11i1.6099
  6. Lee, Y., & Kozar, K. A. (2012). Understanding of website usability: specifying and measuring constructs and their relationships. Decision Support Systems, 52(2), 450-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.004
  7. Lewis, J. R. (1995). IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 7 (1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319509526110
  8. McKay, E. N. (2013). UI is communication: How to design intuitive, user centered interfaces by focusing on effective communication. Newnes. Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann. Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York, USA: Basic Civitas Books. Park, K., & Lim, H. (1999). A structured methodology for comparative evaluation of user interface desig