Dergiler / Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Analysis of Policies toward Drugs by Turkey’s Ministry of Health

Sayfa
171–180
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Also noted are the lack of data used in assessing the practical consequences of policies for the fight against drugs, the fact that the fight against drugs in Turkey implemented is multi-headed, and the existence of national plans prepared by different institutions

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Drug use constitutes an important public health issue due to the danger that it presents not only to users but also to society as a whole.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study was conducted as part of the Ministry of Health’s drug policy based on the output set between 2013 and 2015 and under the Anti-Drug Emergency Action Plan 2015.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Also noted are the lack of data used in assessing the practical consequences of policies for the fight against drugs, the fact that the fight against drugs in Turkey implemented is multi-headed, and the existence of national plans prepared by different institutions
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Drug use constitutes an important public health issue due to the danger that it presents not only to users but also to society as a whole. Aiming to analyze the anti-drug policies implemented by Turkey’s Ministry of Health for preventive and curative health services, this study used a process analysis method to analyze the data retrospectively. The study was conducted as part of the Ministry of Health’s drug policy based on the output set between 2013 and 2015 and under the Anti-Drug Emergency Action Plan 2015. The policy analysis found not only that the number of treatment centers included in the emergency action plan had increased but also that diagnostic standards had been developed, an advisory hotline for the prevention and treatment of drug use had been established, the media was effective in provoking reform, and senior administration support had developed in a positive direction. In addition, no practical study related to the targets determined as part of the emergency action plan was found to exist, including studies attempting to determine positive performance criteria for activities carried out as part of the anti-drug efforts in community health centers, the establishment of the Turkish Scientific Advisory Board on Anti-Drugs, making necessary arrangements in generic classification management, coordinating the use of funds, establishing the communication board, Such as the use of a language. Also noted are the lack of data used in assessing the practical consequences of policies for the fight against drugs, the fact that the fight against drugs in Turkey implemented is multi-headed, and the existence of national plans prepared by different institutions

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKBULUT, Y., TUGAY, D. A. (2022). Analysis of Policies toward Drugs by Turkey’s Ministry of Health. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 171–180. https://ajindex.com/articles/857044

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Akgül, A. & Kaptı, A. (2010). Türkiye’nin uyuşturucu ile mücadele politikası: Politika süreç analizi. S. Özeren, M., A., Mehmet ve Ö. Demir (Ed.), Yerelden küresele sınırı aşan suçlar içinde (s. 75–59). Ankara:
  2. UTSAM Yayınları.
  3. BATEM. (2015). Ayakta tedavi mi, yatarak tedavi mi? http://www.batem.info.tr/aile-ve-bagimli/ ayakta-tedavi-mi-yatarak-tedavi-mi/ adresinden 27.12.2015 tarihinde edinilmiştir. Birkland, T. A. (2011). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts and models of public making. New York and London: Armonk. Buse, K., Mays, N., & Walt, G. (2005).
  4. Making health policy. New York, NY: Open University Press.
  5. Çağdaşses.com. (2015). Şok iddia; torbacılar AMATEM’de. http://www.cagdasses.com/ guncel/18202/sok-iddia-torbacilar-amatemde adresinden 06.01.2016 tarihinde edinilmiştir. Çevik, H. H. & Demirci, S. (2012). Kamu politikası: Kavramlar, aktörler, süreçler, modeller, analiz, karar verme. Ankara:
  6. Seçkin Yayınları.
  7. Çevik, H. H. (1998). Kamu politikaları analizi çalışmaları üzerine Türkiye açısından bir değerlendirme. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 31(2), 103–112.
  8. Demir, F. (2011). Kamu politikası ve politika analizi çalışmalarının teorik çerçevesi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 30, 107–120.
  9. Ergül, E. (1996). Uyuşturucu maddelerle mücadelede uluslararası çağdaş politikalar. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 2, 229–232.
  10. Exworthy, M. (2008). Policy to tackle the social determinants of health: Using conceptual models to understand the policy process. Health Policy and Planning, 23, 318–327.
  11. Fitz, J., Halpin, D., & Power, S. (1994). Implementation research and education policy: Practice and prospects. British Journal of Educational Studies, 42, 53–69. Haber61.net. (2016). Bonzai can aldı. http://www.haber61.net/bonzai-can-aldi-254021h.htm adresinden 06.01.2016 tarihinde edinilmiştir. Haberler.com. (2016). Jandarmadan uyuşturucu operasyonu: 9 gözaltı. http://www.haberler. com/jandarmadan-uyusturucu-operasyonu-9-gozalti-8036681-haberi/ adresinden 06.01.2016 tarihinde edinilmiştir. Hibell, B., Andersson, B., Bjarnason, T., Ahlstrom, S., Balakireva, O., Kokkevi, A., & Morgan, M. (2003). The ESPAD report 2003 alcohol and other drug use among students in 35 European countries. Retrieved December 12, 2015 from http://www.espad.org/uploads/espad_ reports/2003/the_2003_espad_report.pdf Hibell, B., Andersson, B., Bjarnason, T., Kokkevi, A., Morgan, M., & Narusk, A. (1995). The 1995 ESPAD report alcohol and other drug use among students in 26 Europe