Dergiler / İnsan ve Toplum / 2015 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 9

The Myth and Reality of Rukiye Hanim in the Context of Turkish Malay Relations (1864-1904)

Sayfa
55–74
Yayın Tarihi
2015-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This sensational imagination has turned out to be a sort of historical fact structured by certain groups, both in Turkey and Malaysia, and it has been functionalized to establish historically the relations between modern Turkey and Malaysia.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The present article investigates the identity, partial biography, and relations of Rukiye Hanim.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:She is recognized as the grandmother of three significant families who have been playing distinguished roles in politics and academics in Malaysia.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This sensational imagination has turned out to be a sort of historical fact structured by certain groups, both in Turkey and Malaysia, and it has been functionalized to establish historically the relations between modern Turkey and Malaysia.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Rukiye Hanim · Ottoman State · Johor Sultanate

Abstract

The present article investigates the identity, partial biography, and relations of Rukiye Hanim. She is recognized as the grandmother of three significant families who have been playing distinguished roles in politics and academics in Malaysia. Rukiye Hanim with her sister Hatice Hanim are believed to have been presented as concubines by Babussaade, the Palace in Constantinople, to Sultan Abu Bakar of Johor in the closing decades of the 19th century. It is significant here to pin down that this article grew out of some concerns upon the discourse argued by circles around the relations of Rukiye Hanim. The present writers urge that the established discourse creates an imagined memory, explicitly or implicitly, borrowing the concept from Benedict Anderson, related to this lady. This article will provide some details on the concubine, Rukiye Hanim who seems to be the main actor to set aright imagined misconceptions. This research relies on primary data particularly from oral information of the living descendants of Rukiye Hanim. Besides, the present writers conduct comparative understanding of the secondary sources to re-examine the mainstream discourse upon Rukiye Hanim written in Turkish, Malay and English languages. This research found that the concubines are not connected organically with the Ottoman Palace family, they are instead commoners and members of other nations. This sensational imagination has turned out to be a sort of historical fact structured by certain groups, both in Turkey and Malaysia, and it has been functionalized to establish historically the relations between modern Turkey and Malaysia.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OZAY, M., SALTIK, E. (2015). The Myth and Reality of Rukiye Hanim in the Context of Turkish Malay Relations (1864-1904). İnsan ve Toplum, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 9, 55–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/853468

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Abd. Samad, P. (2011). The myth of dato’ Onn Jaafar: The forgotten hero. Kuala Lumpur: Partisan Publication. Abdullah. A. (2004). Biografi dato’ Onn: Hidup Melayu [The biography of Dato Onn’: Long live Malay]. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Abdullah, A. R. T. (2011). Hikayat Johor dan tawarikh almarhum Sultan Abu Bakar [Hikayat Johor and the history of the Late Sultan Abu Bakar], Johor Bahru: Yayasan Warisan Johor. Abid, M. (2003). Reflections of pre-independence Malaya (2nd ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Pelanduk Publications. Adam, R. (1992). Dato’ Onn Ja’afar: Pengasas Kemerdekaan [Dato’ Onn Ja’afar: Initiatior of the independence]. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Adam, R. (2005). Dato’ Onn Ja’afar: Pengasas Kemerdekaan [Dato’ Onn Ja’afar: Initiatior of the independence] (Cetakan keempat [4rth ed.]). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Anwar, Z. (2011). Legacy of honour. Kuala Lumpur: Yayasan Mohamed Noah. Armağan, M. (2007, 30 Eylül). Malezya kimliğinde Osmanlı damgası. Retrieved May 26, 2015, from http://www.zaman.com.tr/mustafa-armagan/malezya-kimliginde-osmanli-damgasi_787391.html.
  2. Aymalı, Ö. (2014, 9 Ocak). Osmanlı-Malezya ilişkileri nasıl gelişti? Retrieved May 26, 2015, from http://www.dunyabulteni.net/?aType=haber&ArticleID=285731. Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivleri. (t.y.), Y.PRK.BŞK. No: 30, 1310, L, 28, 8. Borham, A. J. (2002). Ahkam syar’iyyah Johor: Kod undang-undang keluarga Islam kerajaan negeri Johor 1935 [Johor Syar’iyyah law code: Muslim family law in Johor state government 1935]. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Brookes, D S. (Ed.) (2008). The concubine, the princess, and the teacher: Voices from the Ottoman Harem. Austin: University of Texas Press. Bugis. (n.d.). Retrieved May 27, 2015, from http://self.gutenberg.org/articles/bugis.
  3. Colachal, A. R. (2014, January 13). Focus on Malaysia Turkey relations. Retrieved May 27, 2015, from https://abdulrubb.wordpress.com/2014/01/13/focus-on-malaysia-turkey-relations. Death of the Sultan of Johore. (1895, July 8). The Singapore Free Press and Mercantile Advertiser (1884-1942). Microfilm NL3157, Lee Kong Chian Reference Library. Demir, N. Özcan (2003). Osmanlı Devletinde harem kurumu. Sosyoloji Konferansları Dergisi [Istanbul Journal of Sociological Studies], 28. Retrieved May 27, 2015, from www.journals.istanbul.edu.tr/iusoskon/./1023005746. Haji Abdul Rahman, Mohd. T. (1987). Dato’ Onn Jaafar: Tokoh nasionalis [Dato’ Onn Jaafar: National hero]. Selangor: Pelanduk Publica