Dergiler / Marine Science and Technology Bulletin / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

Sustainability of Karacaören-I Dam Lake Rainbow Trout Cage Farming (Türkiye) in Terms of Cultural Energy and Carbon Footprint Expended on Compound Diet and Transportation

Sayfa
475–492
Yayın Tarihi
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is recommended to develop a sustainability index of aquaculture systems and species-specific CE and CF expended values.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study was to assess the consumed compound diet and juvenile fish, harvested fish, and compound diet transport of Karacaören Dam Lake-I rainbow trout cage farming (KRTC) in terms of cultural energy (CE) and carbon footprint (CF) expended sustainability.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The lowest and highest FCRs in KRTC were 0.91 and 1.18, the closest and farthest distances related to transportation were 387 and 427 km for aquafeed factories, 7 and 650 km for hatcheries, and 67 and 450 km for processing factories.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is recommended to develop a sustainability index of aquaculture systems and species-specific CE and CF expended values.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:carbon footprint · cultural energy · compound diet

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the consumed compound diet and juvenile fish, harvested fish, and compound diet transport of Karacaören Dam Lake-I rainbow trout cage farming (KRTC) in terms of cultural energy (CE) and carbon footprint (CF) expended sustainability. Data was collected through face-to-face interviews with the farmers. Cultural energy and carbon footprint were calculated with the data obtained from the literature. The lowest and highest FCRs in KRTC were 0.91 and 1.18, the closest and farthest distances related to transportation were 387 and 427 km for aquafeed factories, 7 and 650 km for hatcheries, and 67 and 450 km for processing factories. Cultural energy and carbon footprint expended on consumed compound diet (CECD-Gcal and Mcal kg-1, and CFCD-tonne CO2e and kg CO2e kg-1) and cultural energy and carbon footprint expended on transportation analyzes (CET-Gcal and Mcal kg-1, and CFT-tonne CO2e and kg CO2e kg-1) were performed according to the literature of 20-40 g fish stocked in the beginning of November 2020 and 270-500 g harvested until early June 2021 in the basin. In the access of sustainability, the CE (Mcal kg-1) and CF (CO2e kg-1) expended values in kg of the harvested fish were given. The average values of CE expended of 5 different aquafeed groups used in the basin were 3.65, 3.58, 3.41, 3.25, and 3.55 Mcal kg-1, respectively and the average values of CF expended were 1.05, 1.03, 1.14, 1.40, and 1.10 kg CO2e kg-1, respectively. The average share of CE and CF in the compound diet was 86.59% and 86.61%, respectively. The KRTC sustainability criterion for compound diet and transportation values was 2.9260 CE:CF. It is recommended to develop a sustainability index of aquaculture systems and species-specific CE and CF expended values.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DİKEN, G. (2022). Sustainability of Karacaören-I Dam Lake Rainbow Trout Cage Farming (Türkiye) in Terms of Cultural Energy and Carbon Footprint Expended on Compound Diet and Transportation. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 475–492. https://ajindex.com/articles/850607

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Adhikari, S., Lal, R., & Sahu, B. C. (2013). Carbon footprint of aquaculture in eastern India. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 4(4), 410-421. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2013.028
  2. Akunal, T., & Koknaroglu, H. (2021). Commercial native laying hybrids developed in Turkey are comparable to foreign hybrids in terms of performance and cultural energy use efficiency. Animal Science Papers and Reports, 39(2), 169-177.
  3. Anonymous. (2021). Isparta Directorate of Provincial Agriculture and Forestry, Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Arslan, G., & Oguzhan Yildiz, P. (2021). Türkiye su ürünleri sektörüne genel bakış [An overview to fisheries sector in Turkey]. Menba Kastamonu Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 46-57.
  4. Becer Ozvarol, Z. A., & İkiz, R. (2009). Mortality ratio and stock analysis of vimba (Vimba vimba tenella (Nordmann,1840)) population in Karacaoren I Dam Lake (Burdur Turkey). Journal of Applied Biological Sciences, 3(2), 143-147.
  5. Boissy, J., Aubin, J., Drissi, A., van der Werf, H. M. G., Bell, G. J., & Kaushik, S. J. (2011). Environmental impacts of plant-based salmonid diets at feed and farm scales. Aquaculture, 321(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.08.033
  6. Boyd, C. E., McNevin, A. A., & Tucker, C. S. (2019). Resource use and the environment. In Lucas, J. S., Southgate, P. C., & Tucker, C. S. (Eds.), Aquaculture Farming Aquatic Animals and Plants (pp. 93–112). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Chatvijitkul, S., Boyd, C. E., Davis, D. A., & McNevin, A. A. (2017). Embodied resources in fish and shrimp feeds. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 48(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12360
  7. Cınar, İ., & Koknaroglu, H. (2019). Süt sığırcılığında ırkın sürdürülebilirlik üzerine etkisi [Examination of effect of breed on sustainability of dairy cattle production]. SDU Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture/SDÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 143–155.
  8. Cubillo, A. M., Ferreira, J. G., Lencart-Silva, J., Taylor, N. G. H., Kennerley, A., Guilder, J., Kay, S., & Kamermans, P. (2021). Direct effects of climate change on productivity of European aquaculture. Aquaculture International, 29(4), 1561-1590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-021-00694-6 da Silva Pires, P. G., Andretta, I., Mendéz, M. S. C., Kipper, M., de Menezes Lovatto, N., & Loureiro, B. B. (2022). Life cycle impact of industrial aquaculture systems. In C. M. Galanakis (Ed.), Sustainable Fish Production and Processing (pp. 141-172). Academic Press. D