Dergiler / Türk Dünyası Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Yakın Tarih Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

HOW SUCCESSFUL WAS DIPLOMACY AS A MEANS OF CRISIS RESOLUTION TOOL IN THE CYPRUS DISPUTE

Sayfa
57–66
Yayın Tarihi
2017-07-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this study, the success of the diplomacy on making peace andpersuading the parties will be evaluated on the Cyprus issue.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:By definition, diplomacy aims to solve conflicts and disputes that nations experience between eachother with the ways of negotiation or mediation and also aims to prevent violence between states.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:On the other hand,it is not possible to say that this goal is 100% successful in practice.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this study, the success of the diplomacy on making peace andpersuading the parties will be evaluated on the Cyprus issue.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Cyprus · Diplomacy · Cyprus conflics

Özet

By definition, diplomacy aims to solve conflicts and disputes that nations experience between eachother with the ways of negotiation or mediation and also aims to prevent violence between states. Atthe same time, diplomacy opens the way for the sides to profit without giving any loss. It is possible tocome to the following approach through these definitions and functions about diplomacy; diplomacy isalso a means of peace-making. It is even one of the biggest goals of this diplomacy. On the other hand,it is not possible to say that this goal is 100% successful in practice. It is seen that diplomacy issometimes inadequate about peace-making in most cases that took place in world political history. Inthis context, the Cyprus issue has passed into the history of the world as a very long and laboriousprocess of diplomacy. In most negotiations in Cyprus issue, peace-making which is the main aim ofdiplomacy, has been inadequate. In this study, the success of the diplomacy on making peace andpersuading the parties will be evaluated on the Cyprus issue.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

METİNTAŞ, M., METİNTAŞ, M. Y. (2017). HOW SUCCESSFUL WAS DIPLOMACY AS A MEANS OF CRISIS RESOLUTION TOOL IN THE CYPRUS DISPUTE. Türk Dünyası Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Yakın Tarih Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 57–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/844985

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. A. Balcı, Türkiye Dış Politikası: Ilkeler, Aktörler, Uygulamalar. İstanbul:
  2. Etkileşim Yayınları.
  3. F. Aksu, Türk Dış Politikasında Zorlayıcı Diplomasi, İstanbul, 2008,
  4. Bağlam Yayıncılık. İ. Uzgel, Ulusal Çıkar ve Dış Poitika: Türk Dış Politikasının Belirlenmesinde Ulusal Çıkarların Rolü, 1983 – 1991, Ankara, 2004, İmge Kitap Evi. P. Kerr, & G. Wiseman, Diplomacy in a Globalising World: Theories and Practises, New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. Y. Çoşkun, “Kıbrıs Sorunu Üzerindeki Türk – Yunan Diyaloğunun Başarısızlığı (1966-67) ve İngiliz Politikası”, Cankiri Karatekin University Press, 2014. S. T. Laçiner, “Turkish Foreign Policy (1971-1980): İdeologies vs. Realites” Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, 2010, 6(21), 61.