Dergiler / Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning / 2019 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

The Effect of Augmented Reality Training on Teachers’ Individual Innovativeness

Sayfa
32–44
Yayın Tarihi
2019-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result of the analyzes, it was found that the individual innovativeness of teachers who were females, over 30 years and taught social subject matters changed significantly while the change in other groups was not significant.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aimed to ascertain the effects of augmented reality training on teachers’ individual innovativeness.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study group which consisted of 35 teachers utilized one group pretest-posttest experimental design.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result of the analyzes, it was found that the individual innovativeness of teachers who were females, over 30 years and taught social subject matters changed significantly while the change in other groups was not significant.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:augmented reality · individual innovativeness · teachers

Abstract

This study aimed to ascertain the effects of augmented reality training on teachers’ individual innovativeness. The study group which consisted of 35 teachers utilized one group pretest-posttest experimental design. The teachers who volunteered to take part in the study received 40-hour augmented reality training. Individual Innovativeness Scale was used as the data collection tool in the research. For data analysis, descriptive statistics, related samples t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used. It was found that the majority of teachers was in the “pioneer” category before the training and displayed high level individual innovativeness. Based on post-training measurements, it was concluded that the teachers reached the category of “innovative” in individual innovativeness and there was an increase in the number of highly innovative teachers. It is concluded that augmented reality training positively improves teachers’ individual innovativeness of. As a result of the analyzes, it was found that the individual innovativeness of teachers who were females, over 30 years and taught social subject matters changed significantly while the change in other groups was not significant.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SIRAKAYA, M., SIRAKAYA, D. A. (2019). The Effect of Augmented Reality Training on Teachers’ Individual Innovativeness. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 32–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/836711

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Abbak, Y. (2018). Öğretmenlerin yaşam boyu öğrenme yeterlikleri ile yenilikçilik düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Erciyes Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kayseri. Adıgüzel, A. (2012). The relation between candidate teachers’ moral maturity levels and their individual innovativeness characteristics: A case study of Harran University Education Faculty. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(25), 543-547.
  2. Başaran, D. S., Keleş, S. (2015). Yenilikci Kimdir? Ogretmenlerin yenilikçilik duzeylerinin incelenmesi. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 30(4), 106-118.
  3. Billinghurst, M., & Duenser, A. (2012). Augmented Reality in the Classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.111
  4. Break, J. (2001). Individual characteristics influencing teachers’ class use of computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 25(2), 141-157.
  5. Bressler, D. M., & Bodzin, A. M. (2013). A mixed methods assessment of students’ flow experiences during a mobile augmented reality science game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 505–517.
  6. Bujak, K. R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., MacIntyre, B., Zheng, R., & Golubski, G. (2013). A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education, 68, 536–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.017
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara:
  8. PegemA Yayıncılık. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara:
  9. Pegem Akademi. Çetin, D., Bülbül, T. (2017). Okul yöneticilerinin teknostres algıları ile bireysel yenilikçilik özellikleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17 (3), 1241-1264
  10. Çuhadar, C., Bülbül, C. ve Ilgaz, G. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının bireysel yenilikçilik özellikleri ile teknopedagojik eğitim yeterlikleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. İlköğretim Online,12(3), 797-807.
  11. Delello, J. A. (2014). Insights from pre-service teachers using science-based augmented reality. Journal of Computers in Education, 1(4), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0021-y
  12. Demirel, Y.ve Seçkin, Z. (2008). Bilgi ve Bilgi Paylaşımının Yenilikçilik Üzerine Etkileri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(1), 189-202.
  13. Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and