KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS MODEL FOR WAREHOUSE LOCATION IN DISASTER LOGISTICS

Aylin OFLUOGLU
Birdogan BAKİ
İlker Murat AR
Sayfa
89–106
Yayın Tarihi
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

For future studies, the results can be compared using fuzzy techniques.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose- Optimum location of warehouses for disaster logistics increases the performance of humanitarian logistics, so that all the needs of beneficiaries can be delivered in a short time.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this paper, a multi-criteria decision analysis model is designed to decide the best warehouse location in disaster logistics in Trabzon, Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:For future studies, the results can be compared using fuzzy techniques.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Disaster logistics · warehouse location decision · multicriteria decision making techniques

Abstract

Purpose- Optimum location of warehouses for disaster logistics increases the performance of humanitarian logistics, so that all the needs of beneficiaries can be delivered in a short time. In this paper, a multi-criteria decision analysis model is designed to decide the best warehouse location in disaster logistics in Trabzon, Turkey. Methodology- Entropy is used to determine the important weights of the criteria. The SAW, TOPSIS and VIKOR methods are utilized to rank the warehouse location alternatives. The ranking results are also combined by the Borda Count method to obtain a final ranking. The robustness of the model is examined by the sensitivity analysis. Findings- According to the results of the analysis, the disaster situation of the land, land size, and the distance of settlement were determined as the three most important criteria. Sensitivity analysis also proved the robustness of the model. Conclusion- The results are consistent with the expectations of the decision makers and seem to support their decisions. For future studies, the results can be compared using fuzzy techniques.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OFLUOGLU, A., BAKİ, B., AR, İ. M. (2017). MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS MODEL FOR WAREHOUSE LOCATION IN DISASTER LOGISTICS. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 89–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/836163

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Ahmadi, M., Seifi, A. ve Tootooni, B.2015, “A humanitarian logistics model for disaster relief operation considering network failure and standard relief time: A case study on San Francisco district”, Transportation Research Part E, 75, pp.145-163.
  2. Ağdaş, M., Bali, Ö. ve Ballı, H.2014, “Afet Lojistiği Kapsamında Dağıtım Merkezi İçin Yer Seçimi: SMAA-2 Tekniği ile Bir Uygulama”, Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 2(1), pp. 75-95.
  3. Akgün, İ., Gümüşbuğa, F. ve Tansel, B.2015, “Risk based facility location by using fault tree analysis in disaster management”, Omega, 52, pp. 168179. Alberto, P. 2000, “The logistics of industrial location decisions: An application of the analytical hierarchy process methodology”, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Application, 3(3), pp. 273-289.
  4. Alinezhad, A. ve Amini, A.2011, “Sensitivity Analysis of TOPSIS Technique: The Results of Change in the Weight of One Attribute on the Final Ranking of Alternatives”, Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 7, pp. 23-28.
  5. Aslan, H.M., ve Yıldız, M.S.2016, “Yapay zekâ Optimizasyon Yöntemi İle Yaralı Toplama Merkezlerinin Konuşlandırılması”, Bartın Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 7(14), pp. 165-188.
  6. Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S.S. ve Goyal, S.K. 2011, “A multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty”, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 53, pp. 98-109.
  7. Balcık, B. ve Beamon, B.M.2008, “Facility location in humanitarian relief”, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 11(2), pp. 101-121.
  8. Campbell, A.M. ve Jones, P.C.2011, “Prepositioning supplies in preparation for disasters”, European Journal of Operational Research, 209, pp. 156165. Çakır, S. ve Perçin, S. 2013, “AB Ülkeleri’nde Bütünleşik Entropi Ağırlık-TOPSIS Yöntemiyle AR-GE Performansının Ölçülmesi”, Uludağ Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), pp. 77-95.
  9. Çakır, S. ve Perçin, S. 2013, “Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleriyle Lojistik Firmalarında Performans Ölçümü”, Ege Akademik Bakış, 13(4), pp. 449459. Dekle, J., Lavieri, M.S., Martin, E., Emir-Farinas, H. ve Francis, R.L.2005, “A Florida County Locates Disaster Recovery Centers”, Interfaces, 35( 2), pp. 133-139.
  10. Demirel, T., Demirel, N.Ç. ve Kahraman, C.2010 “Multi-criteria warehouse location selection using Choquet integral”, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, pp. 3943-3952. EMDAT. 2016, http://www.emdat.be/advanced_search/index.html, (24.06.2016).
  11. Ersoy, Ş.2016,