Dergiler / Journal of Business Economics and Finance / 2015 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

HOW EXTERNAL CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AFFECTS SEOS PERFORMANCE: MEDIATING EFFECT OF AGENCY COSTS

Sayfa
1–1
Yayın Tarihi
2015-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results reveal that the mediating role of reducing agency costs is crucial to the causal relationship between external corporate governance and post-SEO performance, indicating external corporate governance can enhance performance through direct positive influence on firm performance and, more importantly, through indirect negative influence to decrease agency costs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In an analysis of moment structure (AMOS) setting, this study investigates the effectiveness of external corporate governance in mitigating agency costs and enhancing long-term operating performance for seasoned equity offerings (SEOs).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Additionally, this study hypothesizes the crucial and mediating role of agency costs in the relationship between governance structure and post-SEO operating performance.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results reveal that the mediating role of reducing agency costs is crucial to the causal relationship between external corporate governance and post-SEO performance, indicating external corporate governance can enhance performance through direct positive influence on firm performance and, more importantly, through indirect negative influence to decrease agency costs.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In an analysis of moment structure (AMOS) setting, this study investigates the effectiveness of external corporate governance in mitigating agency costs and enhancing long-term operating performance for seasoned equity offerings (SEOs). Additionally, this study hypothesizes the crucial and mediating role of agency costs in the relationship between governance structure and post-SEO operating performance. The results reveal that the mediating role of reducing agency costs is crucial to the causal relationship between external corporate governance and post-SEO performance, indicating external corporate governance can enhance performance through direct positive influence on firm performance and, more importantly, through indirect negative influence to decrease agency costs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Huang, C., Wang, N., Wang, F. (2015). HOW EXTERNAL CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AFFECTS SEOS PERFORMANCE: MEDIATING EFFECT OF AGENCY COSTS. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 1–1. https://ajindex.com/articles/835191

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Abarbanell, J.S. and B.J. Bushee, 1998, “Abnormal Returns to a Fundamental Analysis Strategy,” Accounting Research 73, 19-45. • Agrawal, A. and C.R. Knoeber, 1996, “Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems Between Managers and Shareholders,” Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis 31, 377-397. • Ang, J.S., R.A. Cole, and J.W. Lin, 2000, “Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Finance 55, 81-106. • Asquith, P. and D.W. Mullins, 1986, “Signaling with Dividends, Stock Repurchases and Equity Issues,” Financial Management 15(3), 27-44. • Barber, B.M. and J.D. Lyon, 1997, “Detecting Long-Run Abnormal Stock Returns: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics,” Journal of Financial Economics 43, 341-372. • Barber, B.M. and J.D. Lyon, 1996, “Detecting Abnormal Operating Performance: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics,” Journal of Financial Economics 41, 359-399. • Barclay, M.J. and R.H. Litzenberger, 1988, “Announcement Effects of New Equity Issues and the Use of Intraday Price Data,” Journal of Financial Economics 21,71- 99. • Baron, R.M. and D.A. Kenny, 1986, “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 1173-1182. • Becker-Blease, J.R. and A.J. Irani, 2008, “Do Corporate Governance Attributes Affect Adverse Selection Costs? Evidence from Seasoned Equity Offerings,” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 30, 281-296. • Bessler, W. and T. Stefan, 2006, “Initial Public Offerings, Subsequent Seasoned Equity Offerings, and Long-Run Performance: Evidence from IPOs in Germany,” The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance & Business Ventures 12(4), 1-37. • Brander, J. and B.J. Spencer, 1989, “Moral Hazard and Limited Liability: Implications for the theory of the firm,” International Economic Review 30(4), 833-849. • Bushman, R., J. Piotroski, and A.J. Smith, 2004, “What Determines Corporate Transparency?“ Journal of Accounting Research 42(2), 207-252. • Cadbury, A., 1992, Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, London, UK, Gee Publishing. • Chi, J.D. and S.D. Lee, 2010, “The Conditional Nature of the Value of Corporate Governance,” Journal of Banking and Finance 34, 350-361. • Chou, C.P., P.M. Bentler, and A. Satorra, 1991, “Scaled Test Statistics and Robust Standard Errors for Non-Normal Data in Covariance Structure Analysis: A