Dergiler / Journal of Academic Documents for Fisheries and Aquaculture / 2014 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

COMPARATIVE STRUCTURAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF TROUT FARMS IN ANTALYA PROVINCE, TURKEY

Sayfa
1–1
Yayın Tarihi
2015-03-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Average profitability was 41.48% for the inland pond farms and 30.28% for the net cage farms.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The research studied totally 19 farms; 78.9% of which were inland farms whereas 21.1% operated in the net cages.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As for the legal status of the farms, 63.2% were private, 31.6% limited liability and 5.3% joint stock companies.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Average profitability was 41.48% for the inland pond farms and 30.28% for the net cage farms.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The research studied totally 19 farms; 78.9% of which were inland farms whereas 21.1% operated in the net cages. As for the legal status of the farms, 63.2% were private, 31.6% limited liability and 5.3% joint stock companies. The analysis of manpower of the farms showed that family manpower ratio was 1.32 manpower unit (MU). The highest MU was 0.84 for men and 0.12 for women for an age range of 15 to 49. It was determined that the inland trout farms had an active capital amount over ¨465 068 whereas those of the net cages was over ¨294 401. The operating costs of farms using net cages were ¨133 382 whereas those of the inland farms were ¨123 252. Feeding cost had the highest share in overall operating costs. Average profitability was 41.48% for the inland pond farms and 30.28% for the net cage farms.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYDIN, A., KOCAMAN, E. M., DAĞDEMİR, V. (2015). COMPARATIVE STRUCTURAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF TROUT FARMS IN ANTALYA PROVINCE, TURKEY. Journal of Academic Documents for Fisheries and Aquaculture, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 1–1. https://ajindex.com/articles/834707

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Açıl F, Demirci R, 1984, Tarım ekonomisi dersleri. Ankara University, Faculty of Agriculture Publications. 245. Anonymous 2012,
  2. Aquaculture statistics, Republic of Turkey, Prime Ministry, Turkish Statistics Institution, Available: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/ PreHaberBultenleri.doid=13 551. Accessed 18 August 2013.
  3. Çetin B, Bilgüven M, 1991, Structural and economic Analysis of Hatcheries breeding trout in Southern Marmara Region, Aquaculture Symposium on 10th Anniversary of Faculty of Aquaculture (12-14 November 1991, Ðzmir, Turkey), 180-195. Do€an K, Yıldız M, 2008, Socio-economic analysis of employees working in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) culture fish farms in Marmara Region, Journal of Fisheris and Aquatic Sciences 23, 17-27. Erkuþ A, Bülbül M, Kıral T, Açıl F, Demirci R, 1995,
  4. Tarım Ekonomisi. Ankara, Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi E€itim, Araþtırma ve Geliþtirme Vakfı Yayınları 5. Elbek AG, 1983, Structural and economic analysis of hatcheries breeding freshwater aquaculture in the Aegean Region, Do€a Bilim Dergisi, Veterinerlik ve Hayvancılık 7,133-140.
  5. Emre Y, Sayın C, Kiþtin F, Emre N, Karaman S, 2011, Comparative costs analysis of Net Cage and Land- based (Oncorhynchus mykiss L.) trout breeding, Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 129-133. Karagölge C, 2001, Agricultural Management-Analysis and Planning of Enterprises, Erzurum, Atatürk University, Faculty of Agriculture Publications. 74. Karataþ M, Sayılı M, Koç B, 2008, Structural and economic analysis of trout hatcheries in Sivas Province, Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 55-61.
  6. Sayılı M, Karataþ M, Yücer A, Akça H, 1999, Tokat Ðlinde alabalık yetiþtiricili€i yapan iþletmelerin yapısal ve ekonomik analizi Türk-Koop Ekin Dergisi 3, 66-72.