Dergiler / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 8

Evaluation for the effects of different cleaning techniques applied on Küfeki Stones Used in historical buildings in İstanbul

Sayfa
1413–1418
Yayın Tarihi
2020-12-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is also emphasized that the laser cleaning is less destructive method for cleaning Küfeki stones among the investigated techniques.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:İstanbul hosts large amount of historical buildings.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Same stone samples were subjected to accelerated deterioration mechanisms.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is also emphasized that the laser cleaning is less destructive method for cleaning Küfeki stones among the investigated techniques.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Deterioration · İstanbul · Küfeki stone

Abstract

İstanbul hosts large amount of historical buildings. Many of these buildings are made of limestone, fossiliferous limestone and clayey limestone widely known in the region as “Küfeki Stones”. In this study the effect of varying cleaning techniques on altered Küfeki stones was investigated. Within this respect, fresh Küfeki stone samples from original building stone (Bakırköy Küfekisi) and recently used substitute rocks from different quarries and regions around İstanbul were compiled. Mineralogical, petrographic and chemical analysis followed by physical and mechanical properties were investigated for these stones. Same stone samples were subjected to accelerated deterioration mechanisms. These altered stones were then cleaned with laser cleaning and pressurized micro-sand blasting techniques and weight losses were calculated and visual changes were determined. The results revealed that rock micro-texture and physical properties should be considered in determining the appropriate cleaning technique. Besides, the usage type of the stone and type of deterioration mechanism should also be considered during the determination of cleaning technique. It is also emphasized that the laser cleaning is less destructive method for cleaning Küfeki stones among the investigated techniques.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERÖZEMEN, T., ÜNDÜL, Ö., AYSAL, N. (2020). Evaluation for the effects of different cleaning techniques applied on Küfeki Stones Used in historical buildings in İstanbul. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 8, 1413–1418. https://ajindex.com/articles/83335

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Angı OS, Yavuz O, Çiftçi E. “Geo-lithological and archi-tectonical properties of ındigenous building and ornamental stones used in landmark structures in istanbul from past to present”. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 28(1), 163-196, 2015. (in Turkish)
  2. Arıç C. The Eology of Haliç-Küçükçekmece Region. PhD Thesis, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye, 1955. (in Turkish)
  3. Mahmutoğlu Y, Angı OS, Özmen IE, Yeşilkaya Z. “Investigation of potential resource areas of indigenous natural stones used in historical buildings in Istanbul”. National Engineering Geology and Geotechnic Symposium, Denizli, Türkiye 12-14 Ekim 2017. (in Turkish)
  4. Kumral M, Şans G, Yalçın C, Kaya M, Bodakoğlu M. “The effects of physical and chemical properties on the formation of historical küfeki stone in Çatalca (Istanbul)”. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 278-287, 2019. (in Turkish)
  5. Serhatoğlu C. Livaoğlu R. “A fast and practical approximations for fundamental period of historical Ottoman minarets”. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 120, 320–331, 2019
  6. Tuğrul A, Zarif H, Yıldırım M, Gürpınar O. “Effective factors in deterioration of limestones used in historical buildings and monuments in İstanbul”. İstanbul Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 12, 39-51, 1999. (in Turkish)
  7. Spry AH. Principles of Cleaning Masonry Buildings. Melbourne, Australia, Australian Council of National Trusts, 1982
  8. Sayar M, Erguvanlı K. Marbles and Construction Stones of Turkey. İstanbul, Türkiye, İTÜ Yayınları, 1962. (in Turkish)
  9. Türk Standartları. “Natural Building Stones-Experimental Methods”. Ankara, Türkiye, 699, 1988
  10. International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM). “The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring”. Kozan, Ankara, Türkiye, 2007
  11. International Society for RockMechanics (ISRM). “In: Brown ET. (Ed.), Rock Characterization Testing and Monitoring- ISRM Suggested Methods”. New York, USA, 1981
  12. Türk Standartları. “Natural Stones Experimental Methods-Determination of the Coefficient of Water absorption Coefficient by capillarity”. Ankara, Türkiye, EN 1925, 2000
  13. Türk Standartları. “Natural Stones Experimental Methods-Determination of Compressive Strength”. Ankara, Türkiye, EN 1926, 2000
  14. Türk Standartları. “Natural Stones Experimental Methods-Determination of Sonic Wave velocity”. Ankara, Türkiye, EN 14579, 2006
  15. Türk Stand