Dergiler / International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies / 2019 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

NEW PERSPECTIVES TOWARDS SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY OF EARTH- CONSTRUCTED BUILDINGS

Sayfa
77–84
Yayın Tarihi
2019-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The key impacts of these considerations help to reveal the bigger picture often blurred while strategizing promotion efforts in favour of private and public contemporary earth-constructed buildings

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Efforts in the preservation of earth built heritage and the promotion of contemporary earth construction by members of the UNESCO-Chair in Architectures de Terre cultures Constructives et Développement durable, have overcome many challenges associated with the appropriateness of earth as a building material the last two decades.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The latter approach can help to develop a planning strategy for new projects in settlements and cities.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The key impacts of these considerations help to reveal the bigger picture often blurred while strategizing promotion efforts in favour of private and public contemporary earth-constructed buildings
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:earth construction · behaviour · Promethean

Abstract

Efforts in the preservation of earth built heritage and the promotion of contemporary earth construction by members of the UNESCO-Chair in Architectures de Terre cultures Constructives et Développement durable, have overcome many challenges associated with the appropriateness of earth as a building material the last two decades. However, negative perceptions remain one of the biggest challenges to date. The Earth Unit has established itself within a South African tertiary institution to address all aspects of earth architecture through teaching, training, and research. A technical and design based approach is driven by many institutions in the promotion of earth construction as a discipline. Although this is one of the best ways to deal with misconceptions and reservations, a direct approach from a social scientific and philosophical stance is equally essential to understand and address negative attitudes associated with raw earth as a building material in contemporary built environments. The latter approach can help to develop a planning strategy for new projects in settlements and cities. This article will identify “Orphic” ideas, attitudes and phenomena, synonymous with “ecologically-sensitive” approaches. Orphic attitudes will be opposed to “Promethean” attitudes that spread via the historical domination of Christianity, science, technology, capitalism, whose attitudinal underpinnings have provided an ideological impetus for ecologically problematic actions. The dominance of the Promethean has resulted in steadily growing ecological crises. Furthermore, upward social mobility and migration patterns, which arguably have arisen from the global spread of Promethean systems, influence the values of city dwellers. These values affect their attitudes and behaviour towards the natural landscape and the built environment. The key impacts of these considerations help to reveal the bigger picture often blurred while strategizing promotion efforts in favour of private and public contemporary earth-constructed buildings

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BOSMAN, G., PITTAWAY, D. (2019). NEW PERSPECTIVES TOWARDS SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY OF EARTH- CONSTRUCTED BUILDINGS. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 77–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/832609

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Alexander, P., Cerutti, C. Motseke, K. Phadi, M. & Wale, K. (Eds). (2013). Class in Soweto. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.
  2. Alexandru, M. (2012). Stories of upward social mobility and migration in one Romanian commune: on the emergence of “rurban” spaces in migrant-sending communities. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 3(2), pp. 150-162.
  3. Badiou, A. & Žižek, S. (2009). Philosophy in the Present. UK: Polity Press.
  4. Bosman, G. (2015). The acceptability of earth constructed houses in central areas of South Africa. Unpublished thesis (Ph.D.): Bloemfontein: the University of the Free State, Department of Architecture. Buttel, F.H. (1987). New directions in environmental sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), pp. 465-488.
  5. Carocci, S. (2011). Social mobility and the Middle Ages. Continuity and Change, 26(3), pp. 367-404.
  6. Crankshaw, O. (2005). Class, race and residence in black Johannesburg, 1923-1970. Journal of Historical Sociology, 18(4), pp. 353-393. Ecophilosophy in a world of crisis: critical realism and the Nordic contributions. Eds Bhaskar, K., Hoyer, G., and Naess, P. UK: Routledge. Guillaud, H. (Ed.). (2010). TERRAEducation 2010: proceedings of the seminar-workshop: summary of works. Grenoble, France: CRATerre-ENSAG. Hadjri, K., Osmani, M., Baiche, B. & Chifunda, C. (2007). Attitudes towards earth building for Zambian housing provision. Engineering Sustainability, 160(ES3), pp. 141-149.
  7. Hamdi, N. (1985). Low-income housing: changing approaches. The Architectural Review, CLXXVIII (1062), pp. 42-47.
  8. Hartmann, T. (1998). The Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight. UK: Hodder and Stoughton. Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question concerning Technology and Other Essays. Trans. by Lovitt, W. New York and London: Garland Publishing, Inc. Hinds, J. & Sparks, P. (2008). Engaging with the natural environment: the role of affective connection and identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(2), pp. 109-120.
  9. Hoyer, K.G., & Naess, P. (2012). From ecophilosophy to degrowth. In: Bhaskar, K., Hoyer, G., & Naess, P (Eds.). Ecophilosophy in a world of crisis: critical realism and the Nordic contributions. UK: Routledge. Iannelli, C. & Paterson, L. (2006). Social mobility in Scotland since the middle of the twentieth century. The Sociological Review, 54(3), pp. 520-545.
  10. Kovel. J. (2002). The Enemy of Nature: The End of Capitali