KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Zeugma Biological Science / 2020 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Microbiological quality of cattle’s milk obtained from different areas of district Muzaffargarh

Rizwan JAVEİD
Muhammad SAFDAR
Yasmeen JUNEJO
Masroor Ellahi BABAR
Mehmet ÖZASLAN
Mushtaq Ahmad GONDAL
Sayfa
28–41
Yayın Tarihi
2020-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was also concluded that standard plate counting is much precise method as compared to the direct microscopic counting method for determining the microbiological quality standards for cattle’s milk in Pakistan.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to check out the cattle milk quality in district Muzaffargarh, Pakistan by biochemical tests, the standard plate counting and direct microscopic counting. 200 samples of cattle milk were obtained from different areas of district Muzaffargarh.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It was concluded that alcohol perception and clot on boiling gave 34% and 24.5% positives results.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was also concluded that standard plate counting is much precise method as compared to the direct microscopic counting method for determining the microbiological quality standards for cattle’s milk in Pakistan.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:200 samples
⚙️Değişkenler:Cattle s’ milk samples · Bacteria identification

Abstract

The aim of this study was to check out the cattle milk quality in district Muzaffargarh, Pakistan by biochemical tests, the standard plate counting and direct microscopic counting. 200 samples of cattle milk were obtained from different areas of district Muzaffargarh. Different parameters were chosen to check the cattle milk quality through biochemical tests, the standard plate counting and direct microscopic counting. It was concluded that alcohol perception and clot on boiling gave 34% and 24.5% positives results. On the other hand in organoleptic test, smell, appearance, colour, consistency and temperature gave 7%, 14.5%, 23%, 38% and 20% positive results. S.aureus, E.coli, B.cereus, K.pneumoniea and S.typhi generated the bar at 8%, 14%, 17%, 21% and 5% positive results respectively. It was also concluded that standard plate counting is much precise method as compared to the direct microscopic counting method for determining the microbiological quality standards for cattle’s milk in Pakistan.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

JAVEİD, R., SAFDAR, M., JUNEJO, Y., BABAR, M. E., ÖZASLAN, M., GONDAL, M. A. (2020). Microbiological quality of cattle’s milk obtained from different areas of district Muzaffargarh. Zeugma Biological Science, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 28–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/823719

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. References 1. Adesiyun, A., Stoute, S., & David, B. (2007). Pre-processed bovine milk quality in Trinidad: Prevalence and characteristics of bacterial pathogens and occurrence of antimicrobial residues in milk from collection centres. Food control, 18(4), 312-320. 2. Balaban, N., & Rasooly, A. (2000). Staphylococcal enterotoxins. International journal of food microbiology, 61(1), 1-10. 3. Bashir, S., Awan, M. S., Khan, S. A., Rathore, H. A., Qureshi, M. A., & Kathu, Z. H. (2013). An evaluation of milk quality in and around Rawalakot Azad Kashmir. African Journal of Food Science, 7(11), 421-427. 4. Bonfoh, B., Wasem, A., Traore, A., Fane, A., Spillmann, H., Simbé, C.,. Zinsstag, J. (2003). Microbiological quality of cows’ milk taken at different intervals from the udder to the selling point in Bamako (Mali). Food control, 14(7), 495-500. 5. Cempirkova, R. (2002). Psychrotrophic vs. total bacterial counts in bulk milk samples. VETERINARNI MEDICINA-PRAHA-, 47(8), 227-233. 6. Chye, F. Y., Abdullah, A., & Ayob, M. K. (2004). Bacteriological quality and safety of raw milk in Malaysia. Food microbiology, 21(5), 535-541. 7. Fagundes, H., Barchesi, L., Nader Filho, A., Ferreira, L. M., & Oliveira, C. A. F. (2010). Occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus in raw milk produced in dairy farms in São Paulo state, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 41(2), 376-380. 8. Freitas, J. d. A., Oliveira, J. P. d., & Galindo, G. A. R. (2005). Avaliação da qualidade higiênico-sanitária do leite exposto ao consumo na região metropolitana de Belém-PA. Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz (Impresso), 64(2), 212-218. 9. Getaneh, G., Mebrat, A., Wubie, A., & Kendie, H. (2016). Review on Cattle Milk Composition and Its Nutritive Value. J Nutr Health Sci, 3(4), 401. 10. Kagkli, D. M., Vancanneyt, M., Hill, C., Vandamme, P., & Cogan, T. M. (2007). Enterococcus and Lactobacillus contamination of raw milk in a farm dairy environment. International journal of food microbiology, 114(2), 243-251. 11. Khatib, I., & Al Mitwalli, S. (2009). Microbiological quality and sample collection policy of dairy products in Ramallah and al-Bireh district/Palestine. 12. Kousta, M., Mataragas, M., Skandamis, P., & Drosinos, E. H. (2010). Prevalence and sources of cheese contamination with pathogens at farm and processing levels. Food control, 21(6), 805-815. 13. Kyozaire, J. K., Veary, C., Petzer, I., & Donkin, E. (2005). Microbiological quality of cattle's milk obtained under different production systems