KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Uluslararası Eğitim Spektrumu Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Türkçe’de hece başında ünsüz kümelenmesinde ses türemesi ve İngiliz dili eğitimine etkisi

Initial consonant cluster epenthesis in Turkish and its implications to EFL

Bilal GENÇ
Namık ÜLKERSOY
Volkan DARMAZ
Sayfa
28–37
Yayın Tarihi
2021-02-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Key words: epenthesis, consonant clusters, onset, Turkish.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Abstract The phonological structure of Turkish does not allow word-initial consonant clusters.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The diagrams were illustrated in phonetic transcription.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Key words: epenthesis, consonant clusters, onset, Turkish.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:epenthesis · consonant clusters · onset

Abstract

Abstract The phonological structure of Turkish does not allow word-initial consonant clusters. That is, the syllable onset position of borrowed vocabulary requires the insertion of an epenthetic high vowel. This changes the syllable structure by the addition of an extra syllable to the word. In Turkish schools, all grammar teachers teach those borrowed words as if they were one syllable words. However, the situation is different phonologically since these are not one syllable but two syllable words. Borrowed words such as tren (English train), plan (English plan) are pronounced with the insertion of the high vowel [i] and therefore become two syllable words. Our goal in this paper was to analyse such borrowed words drawing syllable diagrams in order to prove that these loan words actually consist of two syllables in Turkish. The diagrams were illustrated in phonetic transcription. We also concluded that Turkish initial consonant cluster epenthesis might affect Turkish EFL learners’ pronunciation of English words in their foreign language classes. Key words: epenthesis, consonant clusters, onset, Turkish.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GENÇ, B., ÜLKERSOY, N., DARMAZ, V. (2021). Türkçe’de hece başında ünsüz kümelenmesinde ses türemesi ve İngiliz dili eğitimine etkisi. Uluslararası Eğitim Spektrumu Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 28–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/816012

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Abrahamsson, N. (1999). Vowel epenthesis of /sC(C)/ onsets in Spanish/Swedish interphonology: A longitudinal case study. Language Learning 49 (3), 473-508.
  2. Benzer, A. (2010). Türk Hece Yapısındaki Değişmeler. Turkish Studies: International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic 5 (1), 830-842.
  3. Carlisle, R. S. (1998). The acquisition of onsets in a markedness relationship: A longitudinal study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20, 245 – 260. Delatorre, F. (2006). Brazilian EFL Learners’ Production of Vowel Epenthesis in Words Ending in –ed. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil. Dupoux, E., Kakehi, K., Hirose, Y., Pallier, C., & Mehler, J. (1999). Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (6), 1568-1578.
  4. Harrison, K. D. (1999). Tuvan reduplication and harmony. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on Caucasian, Dravidian, and Turkic Linguistics (2000), (pp.75–86).
  5. Hooper, J. B. (1976) An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.
  6. Kabak, B. & Idsardi, W. (2003). Syllabically Conditioned Perceptual Epenthesis. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Phonetic Sources of Phonological Patterns: Synchronic and Diachronic Explanations (2003), (pp. 233-244).
  7. Kaun, A. (1999). Epenthesis-Driven Harmony in Turkish. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on Caucasian, Dravidian, and Turkic Linguistics (2000), (pp.95–106).
  8. Prince, A. & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. MA, USA: Blackwell Publishing. Rose, Y. & Demuth, K. (2006). Vowel epenthesis in loanword adaptation: Representational and phonetic considerations. Lingua 116 (2006), 1112-1139.
  9. Saussure, F. de (2011). Course in General Linguistics (Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, Translated by Wade Baskin). New York: Columbia University Press.
  10. Ulkersoy, N. (2007). Markedness Differential Hypothesis and The Phonological Errors of Turkish EFL Learners. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey. Vaux, B. (2001). Consonant Epenthesis and Hypercorrection. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/097a/f212f739cdc3091888f57a9ece94fe