Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

The Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Compliance In Mild OSAS

Sayfa
13–19
Yayın Tarihi
2022-01-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The patients with mild OSAS, especially the ones who reach higher maximum pressure on titration test, must be followed up closely during the first 2 months of PAP treatment to detect nonadherence/non-compliance earlier.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: This study is designed to determine the factors for predicting the PAP compliance in mild obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) for improving the cost-effectiveness in the treatment choices of these patients.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Method: The study group comprises 27 mild OSAS patients who underwent automatic positive airway pressure (APAP) titration between July 2016 and December 2017.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The patients with mild OSAS, especially the ones who reach higher maximum pressure on titration test, must be followed up closely during the first 2 months of PAP treatment to detect nonadherence/non-compliance earlier.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Obstructive Sleep Apnea · Positive airway pressure therapy · Patient Compliance

Abstract

Introduction: This study is designed to determine the factors for predicting the PAP compliance in mild obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) for improving the cost-effectiveness in the treatment choices of these patients. Method: The study group comprises 27 mild OSAS patients who underwent automatic positive airway pressure (APAP) titration between July 2016 and December 2017. Demographic, clinic and polysomnographic characteristics of the patients were retrospectively evaluated. Compliance with PAP treatment was defined as the usage of 5 nights/week and 4 hours/night at least. Data of compliant patients were statistically compared with non-compliant patients. Results: Most of the patients (23 patients, 85,2%) were prescribed APAP devices. Acceptable compliance at the end of the first year of therapy was achieved by 11 patients (40,2%) whereas 8 patients used PAP device 2 months at most (29,6%) The remaining 8 patients had not taken the device at all and were considered as non-adherent to PAP treatment (29,6%). The nonadherent/non-compliant group showed statistically the same demographic, clinic, and polysomnographic characteristics when compared to the compliant group. The level of maximum pressure during the titration test was lower in the compliant group (p=0,040). Conclusion: The sleep-related symptoms, scores of ESS or polysomnographic parameters can not be used to predict compliance for mild OSAS. The patients with mild OSAS, especially the ones who reach higher maximum pressure on titration test, must be followed up closely during the first 2 months of PAP treatment to detect nonadherence/non-compliance earlier.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DUYAR, S. Ş., ÇELİK, D., AKSU, F., FIRAT, S. (2022). The Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Compliance In Mild OSAS. Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 13–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/809016

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. The Report of an American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force. Sleep. 1999 Aug 1;22(5):667-89.
  2. Patil SP, Ayappa IA, Caples SM, Kimoff RJ, Patel SR, Harrod CG. Treatment of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Positive Airway Pressure: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019 Feb 15;15(2):335-43. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7640. Izci B, Ardic S, Firat H, Sahin A, Altinors M, Karacan I. Reliability and validity studies of the Turkish version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep Breath. 2008 May;12(2):161-8. doi: 10.1007/s11325-007-0145-7.
  3. Berry RB, Brooks R, Gamaldo CE, Harding SM, Lloyd RM, Marcus CL, Vaughn BV. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology and Technical Specifications. 2015. Version 2.3. Darien, Illinois: American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Marshall NS, Neill AM, Campbell AJ, Sheppard DS. Randomised controlled crossover trial of humidified continuous positive airway pressure in mild obstructive sleep apnoea. Thorax. 2005 May;60(5):427-32. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.032078.
  4. Barnes M, McEvoy RD, Banks S, Tarquinio N, Murray CG, Vowles N, Pierce RJ. Efficacy of positive airway pressure and oral appliance in mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Sep 15;170(6):656-64. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200311-1571OC. Barnes M, Houston D, Worsnop CJ, Neill AM, Mykytyn IJ, Kay A, Trinder J, Saunders NA, Douglas McEvoy R, Pierce RJ. A randomized controlled trial of continuous positive airway pressure in mild obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Mar 15;165(6):773-80. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.165.6.2003166. Engleman HM, McDonald JP, Graham D, Lello GE, Kingshott RN, Coleman EL, Mackay TW, Douglas NJ. Randomized crossover trial of two treatments for sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome: continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular repositioning splint. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Sep 15;166(6):855-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2109023. Monasterio C, Vidal S, Duran J, Ferrer M, Carmona C, Barbé F, Mayos M, Gonzalez-Mangado N, Juncadella M, Navarro A, Barreira R, Capote F, Mayoralas LR, Peces-Barba G, Alonso J, Montserrat JM. Effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure in mild sleep apneahypopnea syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Sep 15;164(6):939-43. doi: 10.1164/a