Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research / 2020 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Normalization Techniques on Neural Networks for the Prediction of 305-Day Milk Yield

Sayfa
354–367
Yayın Tarihi
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to the results of the analysis, the most successful performance value in the 305-day milk yield estimation was obtained by using the neural network structured by using the Decimal Scaling normalization technique with the Bayesian Regulation algorithm (R2Adj = 0.8181, RMSE= 0.0068, MAPE= 160.42 for test set; R2Adj =0.8141, RMSE= 0.0067, MAPE= 114.12 for validation set).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, the impact of data preprocessing on the prediction of 305-day milk yield using neural networks were investigated with regard to the effect of different normalization techniques.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results of the analysis show that applying different normalization techniques affect the performance and the distribution of outputs influences the learning process of the neural network.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to the results of the analysis, the most successful performance value in the 305-day milk yield estimation was obtained by using the neural network structured by using the Decimal Scaling normalization technique with the Bayesian Regulation algorithm (R2Adj = 0.8181, RMSE= 0.0068, MAPE= 160.42 for test set; R2Adj =0.8141, RMSE= 0.0067, MAPE= 114.12 for validation set).
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:305-day milk yield · agricultural data · back propagation algorithms

Abstract

In this study, the impact of data preprocessing on the prediction of 305-day milk yield using neural networks were investigated with regard to the effect of different normalization techniques. Eight normalization techniques “Z-Score, Min-Max, D-Min-Max, Median, Sigmoid, Decimal Scaling, Median and MAD, Tanh-Estimators" and five different back propagation algorithms “Levenberg-Marquardt (LM), Bayesian Regularization (BR), Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG), Conjugate Gradient Back propagation with Powell-Beale Restarts (CGB) and Brayde Fletcher Gold Farlo Shanno Quasi Newton Back propagation (BFG)” were examined and tested comparatively for the analysis. Neural network architecture was optimized and tested with several experiments. Results of the analysis show that applying different normalization techniques affect the performance and the distribution of outputs influences the learning process of the neural network. The magnitude of the effects varied with the type of back propagation algorithms, activation functions, and network's architectural structure. According to the results of the analysis, the most successful performance value in the 305-day milk yield estimation was obtained by using the neural network structured by using the Decimal Scaling normalization technique with the Bayesian Regulation algorithm (R2Adj = 0.8181, RMSE= 0.0068, MAPE= 160.42 for test set; R2Adj =0.8141, RMSE= 0.0067, MAPE= 114.12 for validation set).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKILLI, A., ATIL, H. (2020). Evaluation of Normalization Techniques on Neural Networks for the Prediction of 305-Day Milk Yield. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 354–367. https://ajindex.com/articles/808253

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Akıllı A (2019). Analysis of agricultural data with multivariate nonlinear fuzzy regression method. PhD Thesis, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Institute of Science, Department of Zootechnics, Kırşehir. Atıl H and Akıllı A (2016). Comparison of artificial neural network and K-means for clustering dairy cattle. IJSAMI, 2 (1): 40-52.
  2. Brown-Brandl TM, Jones DD and Woldt WE (2005). Evaluating modelling techniques for cattle heat stress prediction. Biosystems Engineering, 91 (4): 513-524.
  3. Chen LJ, Cui LY, Xing L and Han LJ (2008). Prediction of the nutrient content in dairy manure using artificial neural network modeling. J. Dairy. Sci. 91: 4822-4829.
  4. Cihan P, Kalıpsız O and Gökçe E (2017). Effect of normalization techniques on artificial neural network and feature selection performance in animal disease diagnosis. Electronic Turkish Studies, 12 (11): 59-70.
  5. Dong R and Zhao G (2014). The use of artificial neural in vitro rumen methane production using the CNCPS carbohydrate fractions as dietary variables. Livest. Prod. Sci. 162: 159-167.
  6. Dongre VB, Gandhi RS, Singh A and Ruhil AP (2012). Comparative efficiency of artificial neural networks and multiple linear regression analysis for prediction of first lactation 305-day milk yield in Sahiwal cattle. Livest. Sci. 147: 192–197.
  7. Edriss MA, Hosseinnia P, Edrisi M, Rahmani HR and Nilforooshan MA (2008). Prediction of second parity milk performance of dairy cows from first parity information using artificial neural network and multiple linear regression methods. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 3 (4): 222-229.
  8. Eesa AS and Arabo WK (2017). Normalization method for backpropagation: A comparative study. Science Journal of University of Zakho, 5 (4): 319-323.
  9. Gandhi RS, Monalisa D, Dongre VB, Ruhil AP, Singh A and Sachdeva GK (2012). Prediction of first lactation 305-day milk yield based on monthly test day records using artificial neural networks in Sahiwal cattle. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 65 (3): 229-233.
  10. Gandhi RS, Raja TV, Ruhil AP and Kumar A (2010). Artificial neural network versus multiple regression analysis for prediction of lifetime milk production in Sahiwal cattle. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 38 (2): 233-237.
  11. Gorgulu O (2012). Prediction of 305-day milk yield in Brown Swiss cattle using artificial neural networks. South African Journal of Animal Science, 42 (3): 280-287.
  12. Grzesiak W, Lacroix R, Wójcik J and Blaszczyk P (2003). A comparison of neural network and multiple regressio