KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal for the Mathematics Education and Teaching Practices / 2020 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

The effect of cognitive styles on reasoning and problem solving ability

Agus SETİAWAN
Sayfa
87–93
Yayın Tarihi
2020-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Other findings indicate that field independent cognitive style is better than field dependent on students' reasoning and problem solving abilities in geometry.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cognitive style field dependent and field independent on the ability of problem solving and mathematical reasoning.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The sample of this study amounted to 176 junior high school students taken from three schools in Mesuji regency using the cluster random sampling technique.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Other findings indicate that field independent cognitive style is better than field dependent on students' reasoning and problem solving abilities in geometry.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Cognitive Styles · Reasoning · Problem Solving

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cognitive style field dependent and field independent on the ability of problem solving and mathematical reasoning. This study is a comparative causal study. The sample of this study amounted to 176 junior high school students taken from three schools in Mesuji regency using the cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used were tests of problem solving abilitity and mathematical reasoning on geometry material and cognitive style tests using the Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT). The data analysis used Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA). The findings of this study indicate that cognitive style has a significant effect on reasoning and problem solving abilities. Other findings indicate that field independent cognitive style is better than field dependent on students' reasoning and problem solving abilities in geometry.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SETİAWAN, A. (2020). The effect of cognitive styles on reasoning and problem solving ability. Journal for the Mathematics Education and Teaching Practices, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 87–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/80715

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Adeyemi, M. (1992). Cognitive style and sex as mediators of biology retention-test performance of students exposed to two instructional modes in Benin City, Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Development, 12(1), 3–12.
  2. Alismail, H. A., & McGuire, P. (2015). 21 st Century Standards and Curriculum: Current Research and Practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(6), 150–155.
  3. Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2010). Paradigma Pendidikan Nasional Abad XXI. Paradigma Pendidikan Nasional Abad XXI, 1–59.
  4. Brodie, K. (2010). BTeaching Mathematicah Reasoning in Secondary School Classroom. Spriger Science. Degeng, I. N. S. (1991).
  5. Kontribusi Jenis Kelamin, Gaya Kognitif, dan Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap Cara Belajar Mahasiswa IKIP Malang. Malang. Degeng, I. N. S. (2013). Ilmu pembelajaran, klasifikasi variabel untuk pengembangan teori dan penelitian. Bandung: Kalam Hidup Aras Media. Fischbein, E. (1999). Intuitions and schemata in mathematical reasoning. Education Studies in Mathematics, (38), 11–50.
  6. Hamid. (2015). Pengaruh Strategi Membaca CSR (Collaborative Strategic Reading) dan Gaya Kognitif terhadap Pemahaman Bacaan SiswaSMA Kota Malang. Malang. Hedjazi, S. Y., Shakiba, H., & Monavvarifard, F. (2012). Effect of problem-solving Styles on academic achievement of agricultural students in the University of Tehran, 3(8), 4154–4158.
  7. Jitendra, A. K., Petersen-brown, S., Lein, A. E., Zaslofsky, A. F., Kunkel, A. K., Jung, P., & Egan, A. M. (2015). Teaching Mathematical Word Problem Solving: The Quality of Evidence for Strategy Instruction Priming the Problem Structure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413487408
  8. Keefe. (1991). Learning Style Theory and Practice. Virginia: National Association of Secondary School Principals. Lailiyah, S., Nusantara, T., Sa’dijah, C., & Irawan, E. B. (2015). Proses Berpikir Versus Penalaran Matematika, (978), 1016–1023.
  9. Litner, J. (2000). Mathematical Reasoning in task Solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, (41), 165–190.
  10. Mathematics, N. C. of T. of. (2000). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Messick, S. (1976). Individuality in learning. (Oxford, Ed.). England: Jossey-Bass. Motallebzadeh, K., & Kafi, Z. (2014). Place-Based Education: Does it Improve 21st Century Skills? International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(1), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4