KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Scientific Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4

Anaerobic Co-digestion of Sewage Sludge with Food Waste: Kinetic Models

Meltem CEBECİ
Turgay BİŞGİN
Halil ŞENOL
İlknur ŞENTÜRK
Sayfa
84–89
Yayın Tarihi
2019-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result, according to the characterization of the sludge from the wastewater treatment plant, it is recommended that the sludge be dried and evaluated as well as the integrated management of the sewage sludge with organic wastes (vegetable waste).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Large quantities of waste activated sludge can be produced with the growth of wastewater treatment plants.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Batch experiments were performed under mesophilic conditions (37 ± 1°C) and eleven different VW / WS ratios and methane production potentials were evaluated by standard BMP test.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result, according to the characterization of the sludge from the wastewater treatment plant, it is recommended that the sludge be dried and evaluated as well as the integrated management of the sewage sludge with organic wastes (vegetable waste).
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Sewage sludge · biogas · integrated waste management

Abstract

Large quantities of waste activated sludge can be produced with the growth of wastewater treatment plants. Anaerobic technology allows to co-digestion of nutrient-rich and high COD-containing wastes. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of anaerobic disintegration of wastewater treatment plant sludge (WS) and vegetable wastes (VW). Batch experiments were performed under mesophilic conditions (37 ± 1°C) and eleven different VW / WS ratios and methane production potentials were evaluated by standard BMP test. The logistic model and modified Gompertz model were used to estimate methane yield and evaluate kinetic parameters. It was shown that the systems more stabled where VW and WS are fragmented together Modified Gompertz model (R2: 0.884-0.999) showed a better fit to the test results. As a result, according to the characterization of the sludge from the wastewater treatment plant, it is recommended that the sludge be dried and evaluated as well as the integrated management of the sewage sludge with organic wastes (vegetable waste).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CEBECİ, M., BİŞGİN, T., ŞENOL, H., ŞENTÜRK, İ. (2019). Anaerobic Co-digestion of Sewage Sludge with Food Waste: Kinetic Models. Scientific Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4, 84–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/799291

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Angelidaki, I., Ellegaard, L., Ahring, B.K., (2003). Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol, 109, 95-105, DOI: doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:109:1-3:95. Dai, X., Duan, N., Dong, B., Dai, L., (2013). High-solids anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste in comparison with mono digestions: Stability and performance. Waste Management 33 (2013) 308–316, DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.10.018. Mata-Alvarez, J., Llabres, S.M.P., (2000). Anaerobic co-digestion of solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives. Bioresource Technology, 74, 3-16, DOI: doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00023-7.
  2. Braun, R., Wellinger, A., (2005). Potential of Co-Digestion. Task 37-Energy from biogas and landfill gas, IEA Task Group, T.37. Speece, R. (1996). Anaerobic Biotechnology for Industrial Wastewater, Nashville, Tennesse. APHA-AWWA. (1989). Standard methods for water and wastewater. 17th ed. Amer. Publ. HlthAssoc/American Water Works Assoc, Washington, DC, USA. Oda, V., Korkmaz, M., Özkurt, E. (2016). Some sigmoidal models used in estimating the growth curve and biological parameters obtained: Von Bertalanffy pattern sample. Ordu Univ. J. Sci. Tech., 6 (1), https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/227497
  3. Zwietering, M., Jongenburger, I., Rombouts, F. (1990). Van'tRiet K. Modeling of the bacterial growth curve. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 56, 1875–1881.
  4. Sperandei, S. (2014). Understanding logistic regression analysis. Biochem Med. 24(1), 12-18, DOI: 10.11613/BM.2014.003. Kim, H.W., Han, S.K., Shin, H.S. (2003). The optimization of food waste addition as a co-substrate in anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Waste Manage. Res, 21, 515-526, DOI: 10.1177/0734242X0302100604. Syaichurrozi I., Rusdi R., Dwicahyanto S., Toron YS. (2016). Biogas production from co-digestion vinasse waste and tofu-processing wastewater and kinetics. Int J Renew Energy Res., 6(3), 1057-1070.
  5. Andriamanohiarisoamanana, F.J., Saikawa, A., Tarukawa, K., Qi, G., Pan, Z., Yamashiro, T., Iwasaki, M., Ihara, I., Nishida, T., Umetsu, K. (2017). Anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure, meat, and bone meal, and crude glycerol under mesophilic conditions: Synergistic effect and kinetic studies. Energy Sustain. Dev., 40, 11-18, DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2017.05.008. Sahu, N., Sharma, A., Mishra, P., Chandrashekhar, B., Sharma, G., Kapley, A., Pandey, R. (2017). Evaluation of biogas production potential of kitchen waste in the pres