Dergiler / PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs / 2006 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

THE SOCIO-POLITICAL ANALYSIS OF EU’S INSTITUTIONAL DEFICITS WITHIN THE EXTENT OF DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE

Sayfa
85–120
Yayın Tarihi
2006-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This article tries to indicate the institutional deficits of EU in achieving the aforementioned aims

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The EU began its journey at the beginning of the second half of the twentieth century as a sectoral cooperation between the six founding member states and progressed miraculously by creating an economic union and then a political union with the new members.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Throughout the years it has developed with new members and institutional set up in order to cope with the tremendous issues concerning the administration of the European people.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This article tries to indicate the institutional deficits of EU in achieving the aforementioned aims
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Institutional deficit · legitimacy · political accountability

Abstract

The EU began its journey at the beginning of the second half of the twentieth century as a sectoral cooperation between the six founding member states and progressed miraculously by creating an economic union and then a political union with the new members. Throughout the years it has developed with new members and institutional set up in order to cope with the tremendous issues concerning the administration of the European people. It has advanced to such an extent that recently its structure and institutions have been questioned in terms of congruence with democratic rules and procedures; and what is more, this is usually done by comparing the EU with democratically and economically developed states. This article tries to indicate the institutional deficits of EU in achieving the aforementioned aims

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

İNAÇ, H., GÜNER, Ü. (2006). THE SOCIO-POLITICAL ANALYSIS OF EU’S INSTITUTIONAL DEFICITS WITHIN THE EXTENT OF DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 85–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/795918

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J. A., Limongi, F. and Przeworski, A., 1996, ‘Classifying Political Regimes’, Studies in Comparative International Development, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 3–36.
  2. Qted in Zweifel, D. T.,2002a, Democratic Deficit?, Lenxington Books, Oxford, Newyork. Barker, R., 1993, ‘Democracy and Individual Freedom’ in A.M.Rieu and G. Duprat (eds.) European Democratic Culture, Routledge, London. Qted in Mather, J., 2001, ‘The European Parliament- A Model of Representative Democracy?’, West European Politics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 181-201.
  3. Bealey, F., 1998, The Blackwell Dictionary of Political Science, Blackwell Publishers Massachusetts. Qted in Neuhold, C., 2001, ‘The Legislative Backbone-Keeping The Institution Upright? The Role of European Parliament. Braud, P., 1997, ‘Decline of the Founding Values of Democracy and Weakening of Quasi Missionary Institutions’, Studies in Comparative International Development, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 112-124.
  4. Carter, C. And Scott, A., 1998, ‘Legitimacy and Governance Beyond the European Nation State: Conceptualising Governance in the European Union’, European Law Journal, vol., no. 4, pp.429-446.
  5. Casey, L.A., and Rivkin Jr., D. B., 2001, ‘Europe in the Balance’, Policy Review, no.107, pp. 41-54.
  6. Christiansen, T., 1997, ‘Legitimacy Dilemmas of Supranational Governance: The European Commission between Accountability and Independence’, European University Institute Working Papers, no. 97/74. Chryssochoou, D. N., 2001, 'Models of Democracy and the European Polity’, University of Exeter Working Papers, no. 1/2001. Commission of the European Communities, 2001, White Paper on ‘European Governance’, COM (2001) 428. Corbett, R., 1999, ‘The European Parliament and the Idea of European Representative Government’ in J. Pinder (ed.), Foundation of Demoracy in the European Union, Palgrave Publishers,
  7. New York. Coultrap, J., 1999, ‘From Parliamentarism to Pluralism: Models of Democracy and the European Union’s Democratic Deficit’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp.107-135.
  8. Dahrendorf, R., 2001, ‘Can European Democracy Survive Globalization?’, National Interest, no.65, pp.17-23.
  9. Decker, F., 2002, ‘Governance Beyond the Nation-State. Reflections on the Democratic Deficit of the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 256– Egeberg, M., 2002, ‘The European Commission-The Evolving EU Executive’, Arena Working Papers, no. 02/30. Eichengreen, B., 2003, ‘Putting It Together: The Foibles and Future of th