Dergiler / NATURENGS / 2020 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Noise Emission in A Textile Plant

Sayfa
53–63
Yayın Tarihi
2020-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A noise histogram showed that noise in the weaving division had spread over a wider range than the dyeing/finishing division.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Textile industry is characterized by the use of complicated machinery in mass production methods in order to meet increased consumption demands.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, noise measurements taken from dyeing/finishing and weaving divisions in an integrated textile factory in Malatya city, Turkey were evaluated.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A noise histogram showed that noise in the weaving division had spread over a wider range than the dyeing/finishing division.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Noise exposure · ⅓ octave band frequency · spectral analysis

Abstract

Textile industry is characterized by the use of complicated machinery in mass production methods in order to meet increased consumption demands. This situation brings with it some issues for the employees. Many of the machines used in textile industry are operating at high noise levels. In this study, noise measurements taken from dyeing/finishing and weaving divisions in an integrated textile factory in Malatya city, Turkey were evaluated. Frequency distribution of dominant noise is also examined. Workers in weaving division were exposed to higher levels of noise than those in dyeing/finishing. Accordingly, the noise level in weaving ranged from 99.2 to 101.1 dBA, while that in dyeing/finishing ranged from 77.1 to 79.3 dBA. It is also outside the 4000 Hz frequency zone, where the dominant frequencies of the maximum noise levels exposed by those working in the measured divisions fall in the middle frequency range to which the ear is most sensitive. Considering the frequency distribution, noise levels in the 4000 Hz region are calculated to be between 84.2 and 86.8 dBA in the weaving division and 60.0 to 61.9 dBA in the dyeing/finishing division. A noise histogram showed that noise in the weaving division had spread over a wider range than the dyeing/finishing division.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DURAN, Z., GENÇ, M., DOĞAN, T., ERDEM, B. (2020). Evaluation of Noise Emission in A Textile Plant. NATURENGS, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 53–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/793339

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Referans1 Seçkiner, S.U., & Kurt, M. (2004). Ofis Güvenliğinin Değerlendirilmesi İçin Geliştirilmiş Ergonomi Teknolojisi: Kairos, Örnek Uygulama. Gazi Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Der, 19(1), 37-38. Referans2 Broch, J.T., (1973). Application of B & K Equipment to Mechanical Vibration and Shock Measurement. Copenhagen. Referans3 Wereski, M., (2015).
  2. The Threshold of Hearing, The STEAM Journal: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/steam/vol2/iss1/20, 1-6. Referans4 Alberti, W., (2001). The anatomy and physiology of the ear and hearing, in Occupational Exposure to Noise: Evaluation, Prevention and Control, 53-63. Referans5 Heather, S., (2014). The science of hearing, http://www.simonheather.co.uk/pages/articles/science_hearing.pdf. Referans6 Grandjean, E., (1988). Fitting the Task to the Man A Text Book of Occupational Ergonomics, Taylor & Francis Ltd, London. Referans7 Sanders, M.S., McCormick, E.J., (1992). Human Factors in Engineering and Design. McGrav-Hill international Editions, Psychology Series, Singapore. Referans8 WEB1, (2020). https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/A12B57E41EC9F326CA257BF0001F9E7D/$File/health-effects-Environmental-Noise-2018.pdf Referans9 Leventhall, H.G., (2004).
  3. Low frequency noise and annoyance, Noise & Health, 6;23, 59-72. Referans10 Brolin, K., Bluhm, G., Eriksson, G., Nilsson, M. E., (2011). Infrasound and Low Frequency Noise From Wind Turbines: Exposure and Health Effects, Envıronmental Research Letters, 035103, 6. Referans11 Alves, J.A., Silva, L.T., Remoaldo, P.C., (2015). The Influence of Low-frequency Noise Pollution on the Quality of Life and Place in Sustainable Cities: A Case Study from Northern Portugal, Sustainability, 7(10), 13920-13946. Referans12 Güler, Ç., Çobanoğlu, Z., (2001).
  4. Gürültü, Çevre sağlığı temel kaynak dizisi No: 19, 43. Referans13 Ekerbiçer, H.Ç., Saltık A., (2008). Endüstriyel Gürültünün İnsan Sağlığı Üzerine Etkileri ve Korunma Yöntemleri, TAF Prev. Med Bull, 7(3), 261-264. Referans14 Ege, F., Sümer, S.K., Sabancı, A., (2003). Tekstil Fabrikalarında Gürültü Düzeyi ve Etkileri, Türk Tabipler Birliği Mesleki Sağlık ve Güvenlik Dergisi, 30-39. Referans15 Babalık, F., (2003). İş yerlerinde gürültü ve sağırlık olasılığı, II. İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Kongresi, Adana. Referans16 Talukdar, M.K., (2001). Noise pollution and its control in textile industry, Indian Journal of Fibre and Textile Research 26(1):44-49. Referans17 Jayawardana, T.S.S., Perera, M.Y.A., Wijesena G.H.D., (2014). Analysis