Dergiler / Middle Black Sea Journal of Health Science / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of the Relationship Between Clinical Findings and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of Patients with Arthroscopic Meniscus Repair

Sayfa
429–435
Yayın Tarihi
2021-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to the results of this study, clinical evaluation and Lysholm functional scoring help the clinician more in case follow-up and the success of the surgery compared to the MRI results.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: In this study, the relationship between clinical findings and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscus repair was investigated.Methods: Seventy patients with a mean age of 29.3 ± 9.2 (range; 18-54) were included in the study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Both clinical and MRI results were compared based on age, time to surgery, type of tear, localization of the ruptured meniscus, combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Results: While the results of 58 (83%) patients were successful in the clinical evaluation, the number of cases that recovered according to the MRI results was found to be 39 (55.7%).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to the results of this study, clinical evaluation and Lysholm functional scoring help the clinician more in case follow-up and the success of the surgery compared to the MRI results.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Meniscus repair · Lysholm · Barret criteria

Abstract

Objective: In this study, the relationship between clinical findings and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscus repair was investigated.Methods: Seventy patients with a mean age of 29.3 ± 9.2 (range; 18-54) were included in the study. The clinical evaluation of the meniscus repairs was made according to the criteria described by Barret. MRI results were evaluated according to the classification made by Crues et al. In addition, the clinical healing and satisfaction of the patients were evaluated with preoperative and postoperative the Lysholm functional scoring. Both clinical and MRI results were compared based on age, time to surgery, type of tear, localization of the ruptured meniscus, combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Results: While the results of 58 (83%) patients were successful in the clinical evaluation, the number of cases that recovered according to the MRI results was found to be 39 (55.7%). The mean Lysholm functional score, which was 62.64±19.73 preoperatively, increased to 90.93±9.58 at the final follow-up. Consistency between improvement in MRI according to Kappa analysis and success or failure according to clinical evaluation was found to be insignificant. In this analysis, the sensitivity coefficient was 52.86% and the Kappa value was calculated as 0.123.Conclusion: No correlation was found between clinical evaluation and MRI results in the statistical analysis. According to the results of this study, clinical evaluation and Lysholm functional scoring help the clinician more in case follow-up and the success of the surgery compared to the MRI results.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARAGÖZ, B., BOMBACI, H. (2021). Evaluation of the Relationship Between Clinical Findings and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of Patients with Arthroscopic Meniscus Repair. Middle Black Sea Journal of Health Science, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 429–435. https://ajindex.com/articles/791041

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. References 1. Englund M, Roemer F, Hayashi D. Meniscus pathology, osteoarthritis, and the treatment controversy. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012
  2. 412–419. 2. Kılıç B. Six-year follow-up after arthroscopic meniscectomy. Adv Environ Biol. 2015
  3. 50–3. 3. Indelli P, Szivek J, Schnepp A. Load Bearing at the Meniscofemoral Joint. Duke Orthop J. 2010 July
  4. Bernard CD, Kennedy NI, Tagliero AJ, Camp CL, Saris DBF, Levy BA. et al. Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Treatment: A Matched Cohort Comparison of Nonoperative Management, Partial Meniscectomy, and Repair. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020
  5. Brian FT. MD, Brian LC. Biomechanics and Clinical Outcomes of Partial Meniscectomy, Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: 2018
  6. Hoffelner T, Resch H, Forstner R,Michael M, Minnich B. Arthroscopic all-inside meniscal repair—Does the meniscus heal? A clinical and radiological follow-up examination to verify meniscal healing using a 3-T MRI. Skeletal Radiol.2011
  7. 181–187. 7. Muellner T, Egkher A, Nikolic A, Funovics M, Metz V. Open meniscal repair: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings after twelve years. Am J Sports Med 1999
  8. Hantes ME, Zachos VC, Zibis AH, Papanagiotou P, Karahalios T, Malizos KN. Evaluation of meniscal repair with serial magnetic resonance imaging: A comparative study between conventional MRI and indirect MR arthrography. Eur J Radiol. 2004
  9. 231–237. 9. Yu M, Yu JK, Ao YF, Zheng ZZ, Gong X, Leung KKM. Diagnostic values of 3 methods for evaluating meniscal healing status after meniscal repair: Comparison among second-look arthroscopy, clinical assessment, and magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med. 2011
  10. Barrett GR, Field MH, Treacy SH, Ruff CG. Clinical results of meniscus repair in patients 40 years and older. Arthroscopy. 1998
  11. 824–9. 11. Crues JV, Mink J, Levy TL, Lotysch M, Stoller DW. Meniscal tears of the knee: accuracy of MR imaging. Radiology 1987
  12. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977
  13. Stone RG, Frewin PR, Gonzales S. Long-term assessment of arthroscopic meniscus repair: A two- to six-year follow-up study. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 1990
  14. 73–8. 14. Steenbrugge F, Verdonk R, Verstraete K. Long-term assessment of arthroscopic meniscus repair: A 13-year follow-up study. Knee. 2002
  15. 181–7. 15. Steadman JR, Matheny LM,