Dergiler / Language and Technology / 2020 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Digital Natives’ Use of Web 2.0 Tools in Learning Foreign Language: A Case Study

Sayfa
26–43
Yayın Tarihi
2020-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Parallel with the information in the literature review; the results of this study show that digital natives use Web 2.0 tools quite often and they are ambitious and practical in generating content and sharing their contents via connections.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In the information age, depending on the ubiquitousness of information and digitalization, learners’ learning methods and approaches have changed rapidly and profoundly.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Web 2.0 tools and recent technologies have facilitated people’s lives as well as their teaching and learning environments.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Parallel with the information in the literature review; the results of this study show that digital natives use Web 2.0 tools quite often and they are ambitious and practical in generating content and sharing their contents via connections.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Web 2.0 tools · digital natives · foreign language learning

Abstract

In the information age, depending on the ubiquitousness of information and digitalization, learners’ learning methods and approaches have changed rapidly and profoundly. Web 2.0 tools and recent technologies have facilitated people’s lives as well as their teaching and learning environments. The generation called “digital natives” live addictively to Web 2.0 and digital media tools. This generation with a perfect command of Web 2.0 tools can reach boundless information and interact with people around the world. In this context, learning a foreign language has become vital for communication and a common language (lingua franca) has become indispensable in this globalized world. Widespread use of Web 2.0 tools in foreign language learning enables both learners and teachers to interact and access information in a short time in and out of class. Accordingly, this study aims to determine digital natives’ levels of using Web 2.0 tools in learning foreign languages under the Connectivism Theory and Cognitive Theory of Multimedia. It’s anticipated that the findings of the research will enable both face to face and distance education-based institutions to learn more about digital natives and their learning styles. In this case study, data collection was completed through semi-structured oral interviews, observations, and document analysis. Parallel with the information in the literature review; the results of this study show that digital natives use Web 2.0 tools quite often and they are ambitious and practical in generating content and sharing their contents via connections.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BOZNA, H., YÜZER, T. V. (2020). Digital Natives’ Use of Web 2.0 Tools in Learning Foreign Language: A Case Study. Language and Technology, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 26–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/788472

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Al-shehri, S. (2012). Contextual language learning: The educational potential of mobile technologies and social media Ph.D. Thesis, School of Education, The University of Queensland. Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. Handbook of Distance Education, 129-144.
  2. Anderson, T. (2016). Theories for learning with emerging technologies.Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications, 35-50.
  3. Attwell, G. (2007). Personal Learning Environments. The future of eLearning? Elearning papers, 2(1), 1-8.
  4. Aydin, S. (2014). Foreign language learners' interactions with their teachers on Facebook. System, 42, 155-163.
  5. Başal, A., & Aytan, T. (2014). Using Web 2.0 tools in English language teaching. In Conference proceedings. ICT for language learning (p. 372). Libreriauniversitaria. it Edizioni. Bat, M. & Vural, B. A. (2010). Yeni bir iletişim ortamı olarak sosyal medya: Ege Üniversitesi iletişim fakültesine yönelik bir araştırma. Journal of Yasar University, 20(5), 3348-3382.
  6. Bilgiç, H. G., Duman, D. & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2011). Dijital yerlilerin özellikleri ve çevrimiçi ortamların tasarlanmasındaki etkileri. Akademik Bilişim, 2(4), 1-7.
  7. Boche, B. ve Shoffner, M. (2017). Connecting technology, literacy, and self-study in English language arts teacher education. In Being Self-Study Researchers in a Digital World (pp. 61-72). Springer International Publishing. Clinton, G., Lee, E., & Logan, R. (2011). Connectivism as a framework for creative productivity in instructional technology. In Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2011 11th IEEE International Conference on (pp. 166-170).
  8. IEEE. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications. Çelebi, M. D. (2006). Türkiye’de anadili eğitimi ve yabancı dil öğretimi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(21), 285-307.
  9. Çokluk, Ö., Yılmaz, K., ve Oğuz, E. (2011). Nitel bir görüşme yöntemi: Odak grup görüşmesi. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 4(1), 95-107.
  10. Drexler, W. (2010). The networked student model for construction of personal learning environments: Balancing teacher control and student autonomy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 369-385.
  11. Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge. Essays on Meaning and Learning Networks, 493-557.
  12. Dulkadir, N., Kurubacak, G., Ve Yüzer, T. V. (2009, May). The Power Of Web 2.0 Techno