Dergiler / Journal of Teacher Education and Educators / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of Dialogic Teaching Principles According to Educational Ideologies of Teacher Candidates

Sayfa
231–249
Yayın Tarihi
2022-08-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Also, it shows that how participants with different educational ideologies differ in a dialogic learning environment due to their ideology.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The study aims to investigate how teacher candidates with different ideologies differ in their use of dialogic learning principles in the dialogic teaching.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The design of the study is a multiple case study in qualitative research methods.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Also, it shows that how participants with different educational ideologies differ in a dialogic learning environment due to their ideology.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Dialogic Teaching · Educational Ideologies · Teacher Candidates

Abstract

The study aims to investigate how teacher candidates with different ideologies differ in their use of dialogic learning principles in the dialogic teaching. The design of the study is a multiple case study in qualitative research methods. The educational ideologies of teacher candidates identify the cases of the study. The data were derived from the rubric results filled by the teacher candidates and the focus group interviews at the end of the lessons. The results showed that there is no difference in the levels of dialogic teaching principles of teacher candidates with different educational ideologies. The study is important in terms of showing how the characteristics of the dialogic principles change in teacher candidates that has albeit implicitly an ideology. Also, it shows that how participants with different educational ideologies differ in a dialogic learning environment due to their ideology.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BEYAZBAL, S., ŞAHİN, Ç., KARTAL, O. Y. (2022). Investigation of Dialogic Teaching Principles According to Educational Ideologies of Teacher Candidates. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 231–249. https://ajindex.com/articles/780860

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Alexander, R. (2004). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge Dialogs. Bakhtin, M. (1981). Dialogic imagination: Four essay. University of Texas Press.
  2. Bambha-Arora, P. (2018). In a cultural remix English class: Enacting dialogic pedagogy to promote critical cultural perspectives. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. State University of New York. Beyazbal, S. (2018). İngilizce öğretim sürecinde diyalojik pedagojinin uygulanmasına yönelik fırsat ve sınırlılıkların incelenmesi [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi.
  3. Brameld, T. (1955). Philosophies of education in cultural perspective. Dryden. Brufee, K. A. (2010). Taking the common ground beyond cultural identity. Change: The magazine of Higher learning, 34(1), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380209601830
  4. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitattive inquiry and research design:Choosing among five tradions. Sage Publication. Duvall, E. (2007). What a difference an ideology makes: An alternative pedagogical orientation to neoliberal values in education. In R. Alanen & S. Pöyhönen (Eds.), Language in action: Vygotsky and Leontievian legacy today (pp.1-35).
  5. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Evans, R. W. (1991, April). Educational ideologies and multicultural education [Conference Session]. the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. Facundo, B. (1984). Freire-inspired programs in the United States and Puerto Rico: A critical evaluation, Available from http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/dissent/documents/ Facundo/Facundo.html. Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of oppressed. Herder and Herder. Fiore, K., & Elsasser, N. (1982). 'Strangers no more': A liberatory literacy curriculum. College English, 44, 115-128. https://doi.org/10.2307/376825
  6. Garcia-Carrion, R., Lopez de Aguileta, G., Padros, M. & Ramis-Salas, M. (2020). Implications for social impact of dialogic teaching and learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(140), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00140
  7. Gutek, G. L. (2004). Philosophical and ideological voices in education. Pearson Education. Hancı-Yerli, A. (2008). Investigation differences in educational ideologies of school leaders in Mersin in relation to gender, academic degree, and in-service training [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisanstezi]. Middle East Technical University. Johnston, K. (1981). The production of conservative educational ideologies. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural, Politics of Education, 1, 9-21. https:/