Dergiler / Journal of New Results in Science / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Comment on Soft Set Theory and uni-int Decision-Making [European Journal of Operational Research

Sayfa
28–43
Yayın Tarihi
2018-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Finally, we discuss the need for further research.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The uni-int decision-making method constructed by and-product/or-product was defined and applied to a decision-making problem by Çağman and Enginoğlu.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To deal with this problem and to be able to use this configured method denoted by CE10 effectively, we suggest two algorithms in this paper, i.e.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Finally, we discuss the need for further research.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Fuzzy sets · Soft sets · Soft decision-making

Abstract

The uni-int decision-making method constructed by and-product/or-product was defined and applied to a decision-making problem by Çağman and Enginoğlu. The method has a potential for applications in several areas such as machine learning and image processing. Recently, this method has been configured by Enginoğlu and Memiş via fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft matrices (fpfs-matrices), faithfully to the original, because a more general form is needed for the method in the event that the parameters or objects have uncertainties. However, in the case that a large amount of data is processed, the method has a disadvantage regarding time and complexity. To deal with this problem and to be able to use this configured method denoted by CE10 effectively, we suggest two algorithms in this paper, i.e. EMO18a and EMO18o, and prove that CE10 constructed by and-product (CE10a) and constructed by or-product (CE10o) are special cases of EMO18a and EMO18o, respectively, if first rows of the fpfs-matrices are binary. We then compare the running times of these algorithms. The results show that EMO18a and EMO18o outperform CE10a and CE10o, respectively. Particularly in problems containing a large amount of parameters, EMO18a and EMO18o offer up to 99.9966% and 99.9965% of time advantage, respectively. Afterwards, we apply EMO18o to a performance-based value assignment to the methods used in noise removal, so that we can order them in terms of performance. Finally, we discuss the need for further research.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ENGİNOĞLU, S., MEMİŞ, S., ÖNGEL, T. (2018). Comment on Soft Set Theory and uni-int Decision-Making [European Journal of Operational Research. Journal of New Results in Science, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 28–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/777845

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Information and Control 8 (1965) 338-353.
  2. D. Molodtsov, Soft set theory-first results, Computers and Mathematics with Applications 37 (1999) 19-31.
  3. P. K. Maji, R. Biswas, A. Roy, Fuzzy soft sets, The Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics 9 (3) (2001) 589-602.
  4. P. K. Maji, A. Roy, R. Biswas, An application of soft sets in a decision making problem, Computers and Mathematics with Applications 44 (2002) 1077-1083.
  5. P. K. Maji, R. Biswas, A. Roy, Soft set theory, Computers and Mathematics with Applications 45 (2003) 555-562.
  6. N. Çağman, S. Enginoğlu, Soft set theory and uni-int decision making, European Journal of Operational Research 207 (2010) 848-855.
  7. N. Çağman, S. Enginoğlu, Soft matrix theory and its decision making, Computers and Mathematics with Applications 59 (2010) 3308-3314.
  8. N. Çağman, F. Çıtak, S. Enginoğlu, Fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft set theory and its applications, Turkish Journal of Fuzzy Systems 1 (1) (2010) 21-35.
  9. N. Çağman, S. Enginoğlu, F. Çıtak, Fuzzy soft set theory and its applications, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems 8 (3) (2011) 137-147.
  10. N. Çağman, F. Çıtak, S. Enginoğlu, FP-soft set theory and its applications, Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics Information 2 (2) (2011) 219-226.
  11. N. Çağman, S. Enginoğlu, Fuzzy soft matrix theory and its application in decision making, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems 9 (1) (2012) 109-119.
  12. S. Enginoğlu, Soft matrices, PhD thesis, Gaziosmanpasa University (2012).
  13. S. Atmaca, İ. Zorlutuna, On topological structures of fuzzy parametrized soft sets, The Scientific World Journal 2014 (2014) Article ID 164176, 8 pages. S. Enginoğlu, S. Karataş, N. Çağman, T. Aydın, On soft topology, El-Cezerî Journal of Science and Engineering 2 (3) (2015) 23-38.
  14. F. Çıtak, N. Çağman, Soft int-rings and its algebraic applications, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 28 (2015) 1225-1233.
  15. M. Tuncay, A. Sezgin, Soft union ring and its applications to ring theory, International Journal of Computer Applications 151 (9) (2016) 7-13.
  16. F. Karaaslan, Soft classes and soft rough classes with applications in decision making, Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2016 (2016) Article ID 1584528, 11 pages. İ. Zorlutuna, S. Atmaca, Fuzzy parametrized fuzzy soft topology, New Trends in Mathematical Sciences 4 (1) (2016) 142-152.
  17. A. Sezgin, A new approach to semigroup theory I: Soft union semigroups, ideals and bi-ideals, Algebra Letters 2016 (2016) Article ID 3, 46 pages. E. Muştuoğlu, A. Sezgin, Z. K. Türk, Some characterizations