Dergiler / Journal of International Health Sciences and Management / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 15

Investigation of the Effects of Economic Indicators on Child Mortality: Panel Data Analysis

Sayfa
12–21
Yayın Tarihi
2022-04-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this context, it has been revealed that economic indicators are significantly related to child mortality.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The health level of society is an indicator of the development as a whole, and it is monitored through various indicators.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Eviews 10.0 and Stata 15.0 package programs were used for data analysis.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this context, it has been revealed that economic indicators are significantly related to child mortality.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2000-2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Child Mortality · Health Indicators · Health Expenditures

Abstract

The health level of society is an indicator of the development as a whole, and it is monitored through various indicators. Among these indicators, infant and child mortality are followed by both countries and international organizations. The purpose of this study is to determine what effect economic variables have on child mortality. A Panel data analysis was used as a method in the study. Eviews 10.0 and Stata 15.0 package programs were used for data analysis. While the research universe is composed of 132 countries in the middle-upper income and high-income groups in the World Bank classification; The sample of the research consists of 49 countries whose data are taken. The time dimension of the study constitutes the 2000-2019 periods and the data types of the variables were used annually. While variables representing child mortality are used as dependent variables in the study; Gini index value representing income distribution, Gross Domestic Product, per capita income, public expenditure level, and the unemployment rate were used as independent variables. As a result of the research, it has been revealed that there is a positive relationship between the unemployment rate and income inequality and under-five mortality and neonatal deaths. Also, it has been observed that there is a negative relationship between the increase in public expenditure, per capita income and the level of Gross Domestic Product, and under-five mortality and neonatal deaths. It has been observed that the neonatal mortality rate is affected by economic variables more than the under-five mortality. In this context, it has been revealed that economic indicators are significantly related to child mortality.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞENOL, O., CANSEVER, İ. H., GÖKKAYA, D. (2022). Investigation of the Effects of Economic Indicators on Child Mortality: Panel Data Analysis. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 15, 12–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/777358

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Açıkgöz, E., Uygurtürk, H. & Korkmaz, T. (2015). Analysis of factor affecting growth of pension mutual funds in Turkey, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. 5(2): 427-433.
  2. Akram, N. (2009). Short Run and Long Run Dynamics of Impact of Health Status on Economic Growth Evidence From Pakistan. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Papers, No:15454. Aslan, R. & Yapraklı, S. (2018). Politik ekonomik göstergelerinin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkileri: gelişmekte olan ülkeler üzerine panel veri analizler, Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İktisat Anabilim Dalı. Doktora Tezi. Aydın, B. (2020). İktisadi göstergelerin beklenen yaşam süresi üzerindeki etkileri: Panel veri analizi. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi. 70(1): 163-181.
  3. Baltagi, B. H. (2013). Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley & Sons. Berger, M.G. & Messer, J. (2002). Public financing of health expenditures, ınsurance, and health outcomes, Applied Economics, 34(17): 2105-2113.
  4. Bloom, D.E. & Sachs, D. (1998). Geography, demography, and economic growth in Africa. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1998(2): 207-295.
  5. Bloom, D.E., Canning, D. & Sevilla, J. (2001). The effect of health on economic growth: theory and evidence, NBER Working Paper Series No: 8587. Brien, R.M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance ınflation factors. Quality and Quantity, 41(5): 673-690.
  6. Chakraborty, S. (2004). Endogenous lifetime and economic growth. Journal of Economic Theory, 116(1): 119-137.
  7. Cooray, A. (2013). Does health capital have differential effects on economic growth? Applied Economics Letters, 20, 244-249.
  8. Çelik, Y. (2016). Sağlık ekonomisi. 3. Baskı,
  9. Siyasal Kitabevi.
  10. Çetin, M. & Ecevit, E. (2010). Sağlık harcamalarının ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi: OECD ülkeleri üzerine bir panel regresyon analizi. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 11(2): 166-182.
  11. Çevik, S. (2013). Kamu sağlık harcamalarının sağlık sonuçları üzerindeki etkisi: ülkelerin gelir seviyelerine göre bir karşılaştırma. İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi. 48: 113-133.
  12. Çoban, S. (2008). The relationship among mortality rates, income, and educational ınequality in terms of economic growth: A comparison between Turkey and the Euro area. MPRA Paper No: 13296. Deluna, P.Jr. & Peralta T.F. (2014). Public Health expenditures, income and health outcomes in the Philippines. MPRA Paper No. 60115. Dooley, D., Fielding, J., & Levi, L. (1996). Health and unemployment. Annual Reviews Public Health. 17: