Dergiler / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

The effect of the number of anchors used in the medial row on clinical outcomes in arthroscopic double row repair of rotator cuff tears: retrospective evaluation of patients with 3 to 7 years of follow-up

Sayfa
331–335
Yayın Tarihi
2022-01-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Operation time in Group 1 was significantly shorter than in Group 2 (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Arthroscopic double row (DR) suture anchor repair is one of the most frequently applied methods in the surgical treatment of rotator cuff tear (RCT).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, we aimed to investigate whether placing a single or double suture anchor in the medial row affects clinical and functional outcomes and retear rates in patients with RCT who were operated with the DR suture anchor technique.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Operation time in Group 1 was significantly shorter than in Group 2 (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Rotator cuff tear · double row repair · retear

Abstract

Aim: Arthroscopic double row (DR) suture anchor repair is one of the most frequently applied methods in the surgical treatment of rotator cuff tear (RCT). Various modifications have been tried to eliminate some of the disadvantages of this technique such as operation time, high cost, and the high risk of retearing. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether placing a single or double suture anchor in the medial row affects clinical and functional outcomes and retear rates in patients with RCT who were operated with the DR suture anchor technique. Material and Method: A retrospective study including 58 patients aged 18-65 years who underwent DR suture anchor repair due to medium-sized RCT and had a minimum follow-up period of 3 years was conducted. One knotless anchor was placed in the lateral row in all patients. In the medial row, we placed 1 all suture anchor (ASA) in group 1 and 2 ASAs in group 2. Visual pain scale (VAS), University of California Los Angeles Score (UCLA), American shoulder and elbow score (ASES) scales were used for preoperative and postoperative clinical and functional evaluation, and complications and retears were recorded. Results: When the preoperative and postoperative VAS, UCLA and ASES scores were compared within groups, there were significant difference from pre- to post-operative findings in both groups (p 0.05). Operation time in Group 1 was significantly shorter than in Group 2 (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CENGİZ, B. (2022). The effect of the number of anchors used in the medial row on clinical outcomes in arthroscopic double row repair of rotator cuff tears: retrospective evaluation of patients with 3 to 7 years of follow-up. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 331–335. https://ajindex.com/articles/776703

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Kim KC, Shin HD, Lee WY, Yeon KW, Han SC. Clinical outcomes and repair integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using suture-bridge technique with or without medial tying: prospective comparative study. J Orthop Surg Res 2018; 13: 212. Kitagaki JJ, Gomes G, Teruo F, Archetti N, Pozzetti J, Sugawara MJ. Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair. World J Orthop 2017; 8: 631-7.
  2. Aydin N, Karaismailoglu B, Gurcan M, Ozsahin MK. Arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair: a comprehensive review of the literature. SICOT J 2018; 4: 57. Lo IK, Burkhart SS. Double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: re-establishing the footprint of the rotator cuff. Arthroscopy 2003; 19: 1035-42.
  3. Plachel F, Siegert P, Rüttershoff K, et al. Long-term results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a follow-up study comparing single-row versus double-row fixation techniques. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48: 1568-74. Abrams JS. Editorial commentary: improving strength and clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair-role of choosing single- versus double-row repair. Arthroscopy 2019; 35: 2756-8.
  4. Yoon JS, Kim SJ, Choi YR, Kim SH, Chun YM. arthroscopic repair of the isolated subscapularis full-thickness tear: single- versus double-row suture-bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 2019; 47: 1427-33.
  5. Franceschi F, Ruzzini L, Longo UG. Equivalent clinical results of arthroscopic single-row and double-row suture anchor repair for rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35: 1254-60.
  6. Bedeir YH, Schumaier AP, Abu-Sheasha G, Grawe BM. Type 2 retear after arthroscopic single-row, double-row and suture bridge rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2019 29: 373-82.
  7. Rossi LA, Chahla J, Verma NN, Millett PJ, Ranalletta M. Rotator cuff retears. JBJS Rev 2020; 8: e0039. De Orio JK, Cofield RH. Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984; 66: 563-7.
  8. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986; 27: 117-26.
  9. Ellman H, Hanker G, Bayer M. Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68: 1136-44.
  10. Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1994; 3: 347-52.
  11. Burks RT, Crim J, Brown N, et al. A prospective randomized cli