KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK): a long-term outcomes analysis

Mehmet Fatih KARADAĞ
Sayfa
257–261
Yayın Tarihi
2022-01-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, PRK provided slightly better visual and refractive outcomes than FS-LASIK at 6 and 24 months postoperatively.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: We aimed to compare the results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) procedures in the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Material and Method: Seventy eyes of 35 patients with myopia and/or myopic astigmatism who had undergone PRK procedure were compared retrospectively with 70 eyes of 35 patients with myopia and/or myopic astigmatism who had undergone FS-LASIK procedure.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, PRK provided slightly better visual and refractive outcomes than FS-LASIK at 6 and 24 months postoperatively.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Laser in situ keratomileusis · Myopia · Myopic astigmatism

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to compare the results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) procedures in the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Material and Method: Seventy eyes of 35 patients with myopia and/or myopic astigmatism who had undergone PRK procedure were compared retrospectively with 70 eyes of 35 patients with myopia and/or myopic astigmatism who had undergone FS-LASIK procedure. Results: All patients completed the 2-year follow-up period. With respect to age and sex, PRK and FS-LASIK groups were comparable. The differences in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and spherical equivalent were significantly better with PRK than with FS-LASIK at 6- and 24-month visits. FS-LASIK and PRK had similar values of safety index, efficacy index, and predictability at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. No significant complications were observed in neither of the procedures during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Both PRK and FS-LASIK seem equally effective options for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. However, PRK provided slightly better visual and refractive outcomes than FS-LASIK at 6 and 24 months postoperatively.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARADAĞ, M. F. (2022). Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK): a long-term outcomes analysis. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 257–261. https://ajindex.com/articles/776692

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Srinivasan R. Ablation of polymers and biological tissue by ultraviolet lasers. Science (New York, NY). 1986; 234: 559-65.
  2. Chen S, Feng Y, Stojanovic A, Jankov MR, 2nd, Wang Q. IntraLase femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratomes in LASIK for myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Refract Surg (Thorofare, NJ: 1995) 2012; 28: 15-24.
  3. Kymionis GD, Kankariya VP, Plaka AD, Reinstein DZ. Femtosecond laser technology in corneal refractive surgery: a review. J Refract Surg (Thorofare, NJ: 1995) 2012; 28: 912-20.
  4. Shortt AJ, Bunce C, Allan BD. Evidence for superior efficacy and safety of LASIK over photorefractive keratectomy for correction of myopia. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 1897-908.
  5. Majmudar PA, Forstot SL, Dennis RF, et al. Topical mitomycin-C for subepithelial fibrosis after refractive corneal surgery. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 89-94.
  6. Miraftab M, Hashemi H, Asgari S. Matched optical quality comparison of 3-year results of PRK-MMC and phakic IOL implantation in the correction of high myopia. Eye (London, England) 2015; 29: 926-31.
  7. Hashemi H, Miraftab M, Asgari S. Comparison of the visual outcomes between PRK-MMC and phakic IOL implantation in high myopic patients. Eye (London, England) 2014; 28: 1113-8.
  8. Rajan MS, Jaycock P, O'Brart D, Nystrom HH, Marshall J. A long-term study of photorefractive keratectomy; 12-year follow-up. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 1813-24.
  9. Castro-Luna G, Jimenez-Rodriguez D, Perez-Rueda A, Alaskar-Alani H. Long Term Follow-Up Safety and Effectiveness of Myopia Refractive Surgery. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17. Taneri S, Knepper J, Rost A, Dick HB. [Long-term outcomes of PRK, LASIK and SMILE]. Ophthalmologe 2021.
  10. Steinert RF, Hersh PS. Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Summit technology PRK-LASIK study group. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1998; 96: 197-221.
  11. Hersh PS, Brint SF, Maloney RK, et al. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. A randomized prospective study. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105: 1512-22. Alió JL, Ortiz D, Muftuoglu O, Garcia MJ. Ten years after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for moderate to high myopia (control-matched study). Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 1313-8.
  12. Pallikaris IG, Siganos DS. Excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for correction of high myopia. J Refrac