Dergiler / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

The efficacy of ultrasound and low-intensity laser therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome

Sayfa
423–428
Yayın Tarihi
2022-03-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

When the LILT group was compared before and after treatment, a statistically significant difference was found in the degree of wrist extension, handgrip strength and BCTQ parameters. (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The most frequent type of peripheral entrapment neuropathy is carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), which is caused by compression of the median nerve at the wrist level.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of eleven patients (18 wrists) diagnosed with mild and moderate CTS were included in our study with the G-Power program with a 5 % margin of error and 80 % power.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:When the LILT group was compared before and after treatment, a statistically significant difference was found in the degree of wrist extension, handgrip strength and BCTQ parameters. (p
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Low-intensity laser therapy · ultrasound · carpal tunnel syndrome.

Abstract

Aim: The most frequent type of peripheral entrapment neuropathy is carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), which is caused by compression of the median nerve at the wrist level. Ultrasound (US) and low-intensity laser therapy (LILT) are among the most commonly used physical therapy methods in the treatment of CTS. The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy of US and LILT in the treatment of CTS and their superiority to each other. Material and Method: Patients who were admitted to the physical therapy program with the diagnosis of CTS in our clinic were retrospectively examined. A total of eleven patients (18 wrists) diagnosed with mild and moderate CTS were included in our study with the G-Power program with a 5 % margin of error and 80 % power. Patients were divided into US and LILT groups using a simple randomization method. The patients were evaluated in terms of clinical and electrophysiological parameters before and after treatment. Results: A total of 18 wrists were included in our study, of which eight patients were diagnosed with mild CTS and the rest (n=10) with moderate CTS. The mean age of the patients was 49.66±10.68 years. When the post-treatment clinical (Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ), hand and pinch grip strength, measurement of wrist joint range of motion) and electrophysiological parameters were evaluated between the US and LILT groups, no significant difference was found in terms of their superiority over each other (p>0.05). When the LILT group was compared before and after treatment, a statistically significant difference was found in the degree of wrist extension, handgrip strength and BCTQ parameters. (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖTEN, E. (2022). The efficacy of ultrasound and low-intensity laser therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 423–428. https://ajindex.com/articles/776584

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Phalen GS. The carpal-tunnel syndrome: seventeen years'experience in diagnosis and treatment of six hundred fifty-four hands. JBJS 1966; 48: 211-28.
  2. Kaymak B, Özçakar L. Karpal tünel sendromu. Hacettepe Tıp Derg 2007; 38: 141-6.
  3. Serarslan Y, Melek İM, Duman T. Karpal tünel sendromu. Pamukkale Tıp Derg 2008: 45-9.
  4. Kamolz L-P, Beck H, Haslik W, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: a question of hand and wrist configurations? J Hand Surg 2004; 29: 321-4.
  5. Muller M, Tsui D, Schnurr R, Biddulph-Deisroth L, Hard J, MacDermid JC. Effectiveness of hand therapy interventions in primary management of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review. J Hand Ther 2004; 17: 210-28.
  6. Evcili G, Gül HL, Karadaş Ö, Börü ÜT. Carpal tunnel syndrome: In which ratio does electroneuromyography confirm the diagnosis? J Clin Analytic Med 2012; 3: 412-4.
  7. Piazzini DB, Aprile I, Ferrara PE, et al. A systematic review of conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rehabil 2007; 21: 299-314.
  8. O'Connor D, Marshall S, Massy-Westropp N. Non-surgical treatment (other than steroid injection) for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; 2003: CD003219. Rayegani SM, Moradi-Joo M, Raeissadat SA, Bahrami MH, Seyed-Nezhad M, Heidari S. Effectiveness of low-level laser therapy compared to ultrasound in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Lasers Med Sci 2019; 10: S82. Ebenbichler GR, Resch KL, Nicolakis P, et al. Ultrasound treatment for treating the carpal tunnel syndrome: randomised “sham” controlled trial. Bmj 1998; 316: 731-5. Stevens JC. AAEM minimonograph #26: the electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Muscle Nerve 1997; 20: 1477-86.
  9. Bagga B, Sinha A, Khandelwal N, Modi M, Ahuja CK, Sharma R. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in diagnosing and grading carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective study. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2020; 49: 102-15.
  10. Padua L, LoMonaco M, Gregori B, Valente E, Padua R, Tonali P. Neurophysiological classification and sensitivity in 500 carpal tunnel syndrome hands. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 1997; 96: 211-7. Hirani S. A study to further develop and refine carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) nerve conduction grading tool. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2019; 20: 1-7.
  11. Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Join