Dergiler / İZÜ Eğitim Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Metaphorical Perceptions of Primary School Teachers towards Cursive Writing

Sayfa
21–50
Yayın Tarihi
2019-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result of the study, the metaphors concerning the cursive writing were categorized as codes and themes.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims at analyzing primary school teachers’ opinions on cursive writing and their metaphorical perceptions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study group of the research study consisted of primary school teachers who worked at public and private schools in Bayrampasa, Kucukcekmece, Basaksehir, Kartal, Maltepe, Pendik districts of İstanbul province in the 2017-2018 academic year and participated to the study on a voluntary basis.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result of the study, the metaphors concerning the cursive writing were categorized as codes and themes.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2017-2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Metaphor · cursive writing · primary school teacher

Özet

This study aims at analyzing primary school teachers’ opinions on cursive writing and their metaphorical perceptions. The study was conducted by using a survey model. Semi-structured interview method was employed to identify opinions of the teachers more clearly. The study group of the research study consisted of primary school teachers who worked at public and private schools in Bayrampasa, Kucukcekmece, Basaksehir, Kartal, Maltepe, Pendik districts of İstanbul province in the 2017-2018 academic year and participated to the study on a voluntary basis. All of the primary school teachers participated in the study experienced cursive writing teaching at primary school level at least for once. Each teacher was interviewed for 15 minutes on average. In the scope of the interview, the question of “Cursive writing is like…. Because…” was addressed, and teachers were asked to fill the given form. The study is a qualitative study. The content analysis method was applied in the data analysis. The teachers’ confirmations were received by reading out their expressions. The interviews were conducted by a single researcher in each institution that teachers work. Due to the fact that a single researcher was responsible in the data collection process, a comparison between the data was not required. The valid metaphors were coded appropriately, and afterwards, themes were created according to the related codes. The codes were associated with an inductive method and a code-theme matrixing was provided. As a result of the study, the metaphors concerning the cursive writing were categorized as codes and themes.

Abstract

This study aims at analyzing primary school teachers’ opinions on cursive writing and their metaphorical perceptions. The study was conducted by using a survey model. Semi-structured interview method was employed to identify opinions of the teachers more clearly. The study group of the research study consisted of primary school teachers who worked at public and private schools in Bayrampasa, Kucukcekmece, Basaksehir, Kartal, Maltepe, Pendik districts of İstanbul province in the 2017-2018 academic year and participated to the study on a voluntary basis. All of the primary school teachers participated in the study experienced cursive writing teaching at primary school level at least for once. Each teacher was interviewed for 15 minutes on average. In the scope of the interview, the question of “Cursive writing is like…. Because…” was addressed, and teachers were asked to fill the given form. The study is a qualitative study. The content analysis method was applied in the data analysis. The teachers’ confirmations were received by reading out their expressions. The interviews were conducted by a single researcher in each institution that teachers work. Due to the fact that a single researcher was responsible in the data collection process, a comparison between the data was not required. The valid metaphors were coded appropriately, and afterwards, themes were created according to the related codes. The codes were associated with an inductive method and a code-theme matrixing was provided. As a result of the study, the metaphors concerning the cursive writing were categorized as codes and themes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DOĞAN, M. C., BAYRAKTAR, H. V., ATEŞ, H. K. (2019). Metaphorical Perceptions of Primary School Teachers towards Cursive Writing. İZÜ Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 21–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/773017

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Akman, E., & Askin, İ. (2014). Ses temelli cümle yöntemine eleştirel bir bakış. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), 1-18.
  2. Aktaş, E., & Baki, Y. (2014). Türkçe Öğretmeni Adaylarının Bitişik Eğik Yazı Kullanımına İlişkin Görüşleri. International Journal of Languages' Education And Teaching, 2(1), 56-80.
  3. Aktürk, Y, Mentis Tas. A.(2011). İlkokuma Yazma Öğretiminde Ses Temelli Cümle Yönteminin Uygulanmasına İlişkin Öğretmen Görüşleri (Şanlıurfa/Viranşehir Örneği). Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2.1: 27-37.
  4. Akyol, H. (2008). Türkçe İlk Okuma Yazma Öğretimi. Ankara:
  5. Pegem Akademi Akyol, H. (2013). Programa Uygun Türkçe Öğretim Yöntemleri. (6. Baskı). Ankara:
  6. Pegem Akademi. Akyol, H. ve Duran, E. (2010). Bitişik eğik yazı öğretimi çalışmalarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(4), 817-838.
  7. Akyol, H., Yıldırım, K., Ateş, S., Çetinkaya, Ç. ve Rasinski, T.V. (2014). Okumayı değerlendirme. Ankara:
  8. Pegem Yayınları.
  9. Arıcı, B. (2012). İlköğretim Sekizinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin, Türkçe Ve Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Bitişik Eğik Yazı Hakkındaki Görüşleri. Türkçe Araştırmaları Akademik Öğrenci Dergisi/Academıc Student Journal Of Turkısh Researches, 3:1-15.
  10. Arslan, D. (2012). İlköğretim birinci sınıf öğretmenlerinin yazı öğretimlerinin incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(4), 2829-2846.
  11. Arslan, D., & Ilgın, H. (2010). Öğretmen ve Öğrencilerin Bitişik Eğik Yazı ile İlgili Görüşleri. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2):69-92.
  12. Ateş, S. (2017). Classroom inside writing activities from perspective of pre-service teacher Öğretmen adaylarının perspektifinden sınıf içi yazma çalışmalarının değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(2), 1534-1557.
  13. Ateş, S., Çetinkaya, Ç., & Yıldırım, K. (2014). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin yazma güçlükleri hakkındaki görüşleri. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(2), 475-493.
  14. Bağcı, H. (2015). Yazılı Anlatım ve Unsurları. Murat Özbay (Ed.). Yazma Eğitimi (5. Baskı). (89-128). Ankara:
  15. Pegem Akademi. Başaran, M. & Karatay, H. (2005). Eğik el yazısı öğretimi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 168, 48-59.
  16. Baştürk, M. (2013). Anadili Edinimi. Ankara:
  17. Pegem Akademi. Bay, Y. (2010). Ses temelli cümle yöntemiyle ilk okuma-yazma öğretiminin değerlendirilmesi. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 3(1), 164-181.
  18. Bay, N. & Şimşek, Ö. (2013).Okul Öncesi Eğitim Programında Okuma Yazmaya Hazırlık Etkinlikleri. Fatma Alisinanoğlu (Ed.). İ