Dergiler / International Journal of Quality in Education / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY STUDY OF THE SELF-CONFIDENCE SCALE

Sayfa
66–84
Yayın Tarihi
2022-06-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The scale was finalized.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Each person can have confidence in certain areas.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Thus, some problems related to self-confidence, which is an important variant of the education system, can be solved; the quality of education can be increased.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The scale was finalized.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Self-confidence · Self-confidence scale · reliability

Abstract

Each person can have confidence in certain areas. If a valid and reliable measurement tool is prepared and the self-confidence of the individual is determined, some problems encountered in the training of the person can be solved. Thus, some problems related to self-confidence, which is an important variant of the education system, can be solved; the quality of education can be increased. What is the level of validity and reliability of the self-confidence scale in the research? Search for an answer to the question. The quantitative research method was used in this study. In data collection, 302 students were identified using a stratified sample and these eleven-question measurement tools were given to them. The reliability of Cronbach's Alpha of the eleven substances was calculated and the value of .816 was found. Reliability was calculated on the data and then factor analysis was performed. A Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) analysis was conducted to determine the sample size for this. The value obtained by the Kaiser Meyer- Olkin test for the sample size is .794. Bartlett's test was used to determine the factorability capacity. Then, using the varimax rotation technique, it was determined how many of the basic components and variances were explained. According to the results of factor analysis, variables can be collected in three dimensions, as it explains 53,230 of the scale which is studied on. Looking at the Table of Total Variance Explained, it may not be possible to achieve a healthy decision without developing the scale. Therefore, the factor structure of the scale has been studied. The Scree Plot graph was discussed. Because of the large difference in the first three values, they were considered factors. The differences between the others because it is small and close to each other, were not considered a factor. The scale was finalized.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALACAPINAR, F. G. (2022). RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY STUDY OF THE SELF-CONFIDENCE SCALE. International Journal of Quality in Education, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 66–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/768407

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Akın, A. (2007). Öz-güven ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve psikometrik özellikleri. [The Need for Programming Education in Information Society Schools]. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Education Faculty], 7(2), 167-176.
  2. Akkoyunlu, B., & Orhan, F. (2003). Bilgisayar ve öğretim teknolojileri eğitimi (BÖTE) bölümü öğrencilerinin bilgisayar kullanma öz yeterlik inancı ile demografik özellikleri arasındaki ilişki. [The relationship between computer use self-efficacy belief and demographic characteristics of computer and instructional technology education (BOTE CEIT) students]. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology- TOJET, 2(3), 86-93–July ISSN: 1303-6521
  3. Anderson-Butcher, D., Iachini, A. L., & Amorose, A. J. (2008). Initial reliability and validity of the perceived social competence scale. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731507304364
  4. Aşkar, P., & Umay, A. (2001). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin bilgisayarla ilgili öz-yeterlik algısı.[ Computer-related self-efficacy perception of primary school mathematics teacher students]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education]21(21), 1-8.
  5. Bandura, A. (1997).
  6. Self-Efficacy, The Exercise of Control, New York: W.H. Freeman and Company. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behaviour change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  7. Busalim, A. H., Masrom, M. & Binti Wan Zakaria, W. N. (2019). The impact of Facebook Addiction and self-esteem on students’ academic performance: A multi-group analysis. Computers & Education, 142 (2019), 1-14. https://www.elsevier.com/locate/compedu
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Manual of data analysis for social sciences], 31st edition. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Cassidy, S. & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the computer user self-efficacy (CUSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(2), 169-189.
  9. Cantürk-Günhan, B., & Başer, N. (2007). Geometriye yönelik öz-yeterlik ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. [The development of self-efficacy scale toward geometry]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education], 33(33), 68-76.
  10. Çetin, B. (2008). Fen bilgisi öğretimi dersinin sınıf öğretmenliği anabi