Dergiler / International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Exploring the interaction between Science teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and pedagogical discontentment: An attempt to understand why science education reform fails

Sayfa
1–14
Yayın Tarihi
2019-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Methodological implications were also embraced.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Scientific literacy is currently one of the main purposes of science education.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Teacher self-efficacy and pedagogical discontentment are selected to be the target constructs that the interactions between them hold promises to explore teacher averseness to reform. 130 science teachers working in public middle schools located in northern Turkey were participated in this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Methodological implications were also embraced.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Self-efficacy Beliefs · Pedagogical Discontentment · Science Education Reform

Abstract

Scientific literacy is currently one of the main purposes of science education. Science education reform efforts provide rich, comprehensive and explicit messages, ideas suggestions with teachers to promote scientific literacy through student-centered and inquiry-based instructional implementations. However, systemic change that reform aims to achieve yet to come through as most of the science teachers are still using teacher-centered lecture style science teaching rather than implementing reform initiatives. The purpose of this paper is an attempt to shed light on the existing literature to understand why science teachers would not employ reform initiatives in their classrooms. Teacher self-efficacy and pedagogical discontentment are selected to be the target constructs that the interactions between them hold promises to explore teacher averseness to reform. 130 science teachers working in public middle schools located in northern Turkey were participated in this study. The findings derived from this research provided several key interactions between self-efficacy beliefs and pedagogical discontentment in terms of the participating teachers’ openness toward science education reform in Turkey. Methodological implications were also embraced.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KEKLİKCİ, N., SAKA, Y. (2019). Exploring the interaction between Science teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and pedagogical discontentment: An attempt to understand why science education reform fails. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/768269

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Adigözel, S. (2012): Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Fen Ve Teknoloji Öğretimine Yönelik Pedagojik Hoşnutsuzluk Düzeylerinin Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi,
  2. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Zonguldak. American Association for the Advancement of Science Project 2061. (1993). Benchmark for science literacy. Washington: Oxford University Pres. Amy Feiker Hollenbeck & Mindy Kalchman (2013). Professional development for conceptual change: extending the paradigm to teaching reading comprehension in US schools, Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 638-655. doi:10.1080/19415257.2012.728535 Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman. Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75-78. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00064 Bardak, Ş., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2016). Investigation about using strategies, methods and techniques of science teachers based on pedagogical content knowledge. Amasya Education Journal, 5(2), 567-605.
  3. Berkovich, I. 2011. ‘‘No, we won’t Teachers’ Resistance to Educational Reform.’’ Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 563-578. doi:10.1108/09578231111159548 Bruce, C. D., & Ross, J. A. (2008). A model for increasing reform implementation and teacher efficacy: teacher peer coaching in grade 3 and 6 mathematics. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(2), 346-370.
  4. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 473-490. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001 Czerniak,C.M. (1990).
  5. A Study of Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, and Science Knowledge in Preservice Elemantary Teachers. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA. Demirkan, Ö., & Saraçoğlu G. (2016). Anadolu lisesi öğretmenlerinin derslerde kullandıkları öğretim yöntem ve tekniklerine ilişkin görüşleri. The Journal of International Lingual, Social and Educational Sciences, 2(1), 1-11.
  6. Donnell, L. A., & Gettinger, M. (2015). Elementary school teachers' acceptability of school reform: Contribution of belief congruence, self-efficacy, and professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 47-57. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.003 Durán, A., Extremera, N., Rey, L., Fernández-Berrocal, P., & Montalbán, F. M. (2006). Predicting aca