KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Adaptation of the Short Form of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory to Turkish

İbrahim DUMAN
Mehmet Barış HORZUM
Christoph RANDLER
Sayfa
26–33
Yayın Tarihi
2020-09-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Results from a confirmatory factor analysis, construct validity and tests for reliability showed that its version adapted to Turkish is a good and time-saving assessment tool for measuring intrinsic motivation during lessons.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Intrinsic motivation has a crucial role in students’ learning and should therefore be taken into consideration in educational activities.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, the short scale of intrinsic motivation scale developed by Wilde et al. in 2009 was adapted to Turkish Culture.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Results from a confirmatory factor analysis, construct validity and tests for reliability showed that its version adapted to Turkish is a good and time-saving assessment tool for measuring intrinsic motivation during lessons.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Motivation · Intrinsic Motivation · Adaptation

Abstract

Intrinsic motivation has a crucial role in students’ learning and should therefore be taken into consideration in educational activities. In this study, the short scale of intrinsic motivation scale developed by Wilde et al. in 2009 was adapted to Turkish Culture. This is an intrinsic motivation scale, which is an adapted, time-economic version of the “Intrinsic Motivation Inventory” introduced by Deci and Ryan. The short scale has four factors, namely interest/enjoyment, perceived competence, perceived choice and pressure/tension with three items each. Data were collected from 230 high school students in two public high schools in Northwestern Turkey in order to analyze the scale's factorial and construct validity. The linguistic equivalence step was carried out by consulting expert opinion because intrinsic motivation differs from one context to another. Results from a confirmatory factor analysis, construct validity and tests for reliability showed that its version adapted to Turkish is a good and time-saving assessment tool for measuring intrinsic motivation during lessons.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DUMAN, İ., HORZUM, M. B., RANDLER, C. (2020). Adaptation of the Short Form of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory to Turkish. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 26–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/768202

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Akgun, S., & Ciarrochi, J. (2003). Learned resourcefulness moderates the relationship between academic stress and academic performance. Educational Psychology, 23(3), 287-294. doi: 10.1080/0144341032000060129 Amabile, T., Hill, K.G., Hennesey, B.A., Tighe, E.M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assesing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950- 967. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
  2. Başaran, İ. E. (1982). Örgütsel davranış: Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi yayınları. Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual review of psychology, 31(1), 419-456.
  3. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588. Brophy, J. (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational Psychologist, Vol. 18, 200-215.
  4. Brown, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). EQS structural equations program manual. Multivariate Software Inc., Los Angeles. Byrne, B. M., & Campbell, T. L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(5), 555-574.
  5. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.) (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester:University of Rochester. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). Intrinsic motivation inventory. Self-determination theory, 267. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of marketing research, 18(3), 382-388.
  6. Gagne, M. & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. doi: 10.1002/job.322 Gagné, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M., Aubé, C., Morin, E. & Angela, M. (2010). The motivation at work scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 628-646. doi: 10.1177/0013164409355698 Genç, N. (2012). Yönetim ve organizasyon: Çağdaş sistemler ve yaklaşımlar (4. Baskı). Ankara:
  7. Seçkin Yayıncılık. Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S. and Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic mot