Dergiler / International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Adaptation of Xenophobia Scale to Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study

Sayfa
230–243
Yayın Tarihi
2022-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In conclusion, the results we acquired from psychometric analyses indicate that the Turkish form of the Xenophobia Scale yielded valid and reliable measurements.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this research, we aimed to adapt the Xenophobia Scale developed by Olonisakin and Adebayo (2021) into Turkish.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We conducted research on two separate study groups comprising 563 teacher candidates.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In conclusion, the results we acquired from psychometric analyses indicate that the Turkish form of the Xenophobia Scale yielded valid and reliable measurements.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2021 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Xenophobia scale · scale adaptation · validity

Abstract

In this research, we aimed to adapt the Xenophobia Scale developed by Olonisakin and Adebayo (2021) into Turkish. We conducted research on two separate study groups comprising 563 teacher candidates. Before starting the adaptation process of the scale, we obtained necessary permissions from the authors, who developed the original form. When developing the translation form, we removed two of the scale items from the instrument because they were not suitable for the Turkish culture. Afterwards, we performed an item analysis and found that the item correlations of two of the items in the scale remained less than the threshold value of .30. We removed the two items in question, thereby leaving 20 items in the scale. In the applied EFA and CFA, we obtained a two-dimensional structure that overlaps with the original form of the scale. In the reliability analysis, we determined that the internal consistency coefficients exceeded .70 criterion values for both subscales. In conclusion, the results we acquired from psychometric analyses indicate that the Turkish form of the Xenophobia Scale yielded valid and reliable measurements.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GEZER, M., İLHAN, M. (2022). Adaptation of Xenophobia Scale to Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 230–243. https://ajindex.com/articles/768087

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Akıllıoğlu, T. (1997). Contemporary forms and manifestations of racism and racial discrimination against immigrants. Perceptions Journal of International Affairs, 2(2). Barry, D. (2019). Ethnodoxy, national exceptionalism, and xenophobia: A case study of contemporary Russia. National Identities, 21(3), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2018.1431876
  2. Bayram, N. (2009). Data analysis with SPSS in social sciences (2nd ed.). Ezgi. Bozdağ, F., & Kocatürk, M. (2017). Development of xenophobia scale: Validity and reliability analysis. Journal of International Social Research, 10(52), 615–620. http://dx.doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2017.1921
  3. Büyüköztürk, B., Çokluk, Ö., & Köklü, N. (2011). Statistics for social sciences (7th ed.). Pegem Academy. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Manual of data analysis for social sciences (12th ed.). Pegem Academy. Canetti-Nisim, D., & Pedahzur, A. (2003). Contributory factors to political xenophobia in a multi-cultural society: The case of Israel. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(3), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00014-2
  4. Erdoğan, M., (2014). Syrians in Turkey: Social acceptence and integration. HUGO (Hacettepe University Migration and Politics Research Center). Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 389–412. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/0022-4537.00220
  5. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Sage. Hambleton, R. K., & Kanjee, A. (1995). Increasing the validity of cross-cultural assessments: Use of improved methods for test adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.11.3.147
  6. Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines forimproving test adaptation practices. The Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 1(1), 1–13. Retrieved from http://www.jattjournal.com/index.php/atp/article/view/48345/39215
  7. Haque, A. E. (2015). Construction and validation of a new measure of xenophobia. Northwestern University. Hjerm, M. (2001). Education, xenophobia and nationalism: A comparative analysis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27(1), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830124482
  8. JASP Team. (2021). JASP (0.15